Shareholder Suits Flashcards
Kinds of shareholder suits
Direct suits
Derivative suits
Direct suit usage
Used when the wrong or harm is caused directly to the SHs
Power to declare dividends
The Board has the sole power to declare dividends (unless otherwise provided in Articles).
To compel payment of dividends, a SH must prove the Director’s refusal amounted to fraud, bad faith, or an abuse of discretion
Factors to prove bad faith in refusing dividends
- Intense hostility by controlling SHs against minority SHs
- Excluding minority SHs from employment by the corp.
- High salaries, bonuses, or corporate loans made to the controlling officers
- If the majority SHs may be subject to high personal-income taxes if substantial dividends are paid
- Whether the controlling directors desire to buy the minority stock interests as cheaply as possible
Derivative shareholder suits
Equitable action brought by SHs on behalf of the corp. and for the corp.’s benefit (i.e., the damages are paid to the corp., not the SHs bringing suit)
Requirements for bringing derivative suit
Before bringing suit, the SH must:
o make a written demand of the directors to enforce the rights of a corp., and
o allow at least 90 days to pass, unless irreparable injury would result by waiting 90 days
Dismissal of derivative suits
The board can seek dismissal when a majority of disinterested directors, in good faith, and after conducting a reasonable inquiry find that continuance of the suit would not be in the best interests of the corp.
Duty of good faith for controlling SHs
Controlling SHs must refrain from exercising control in a way that disproportionately benefits them over the minority SHs
Shareholder liability
Generally, SHs are not personally liable for debts of the corp.
Exception where shareholder personally liable
Piercing the corporate veil
Factors for piercing the corporate veil
o Corp. is undercapitalized
o Corporate formalities have not been followed
o Commingling of corporate and personal funds
o Corp. is an alter ego of its SHs
What P must prove to pierce the corporate veil
o SH control that effectively renders corporate form a façade (alter ego);
o Use of corporate form to obtain an improper or fraudulent purpose; and
o Injury or unjust loss resulting from wrongful use of corporate form