Fiduciary Duties of Directors and Officers Flashcards
Mini Outline – fiduciary duties
(1) duty of care
(2) duty of loyalty
(a) conflict transaction
(b) usurpation of corp opportunity
(c) direct competition
(3) liability for breach of duties
Director and officer fiduciary duties
Duty of care
Duty of loyalty
Duty of care
Directors and officers must act:
▪ in good faith;
▪ with the care an ordinary prudent person in a like position would exercise under similar circumstances; and
▪ in a manner reasonably believed to be in the best interest of the corp.
Information rule for duty of care
Directors and officers may rely on information, reports, recordings, and financial data prepared by someone reliable and competent in the matter
Business judgment rule
Rebuttable presumption that directors and officers acted:
o on an informed basis;
o in good faith; and
o with an honest belief that the decision was in the corp.’s best interest
Violation of duty of care
Directors are liable to the corp. for decisions or failures to act not undertaken in good faith.
A director cannot act in good faith when committing or allowing the corp. to commit illegal acts, even when profitable for the corp.
Duty of loyalty
Directors, officers, and employees must act loyal to the corp. and not promote their own interest in a way that harms the corp.
Common conflicts of interests (violations of duty of loyalty)
(1) self-dealing
(2) usurping corporate opportunity
(3) directly competing with corp
Conflict of interest transaction
A transaction between director or officer
and the corp., of which the director or officer had knowledge and a material financial interest = self-dealing
Notification rule for conflicts
The duty of loyalty requires the director or officer to notify the other directors, officers, or shareholders of all material facts regarding the conflict
Treatment of conflict of interest transactions
Such transactions are voidable by the corp. UNLESS the interested person can prove that:
* material facts of the conflict were disclosed and fully described to the board and the transaction was approved by a majority of disinterested directors;
* material facts of the conflict were disclosed and the transaction was validly approved by a majority of disinterested shareholders; or
* a court determines the transaction was fair and reasonable to the corp.
Court measure for fairness of conflict transaction
Fairness is based on whether the transaction was comparable to what might have been obtained in an arm’s length transaction and whether the process followed by the directors in reaching their decision was appropriate
Factors to determine corporate opportunity that cannot be usurped
- business is closely related to that of the corp.
- Board expressed interest in acquiring such a business
- opportunity was discovered while acting in capacity as director/officer
- opportunity was developed or discovered using corporate funds or
facilities
Exception to usurpation rule
Even if the opportunity belongs to the corp., there is no usurpation if after full disclosure:
* the corp. had opportunity to pursue it and declined to do so; or
* the corp. was unable to take advantage of the opportunity
Treatment of direct competition with corp
Competition by director or officer is not necessarily a breach of duty if acting in good faith
Covenants not to compete will be enforced if reasonable as to time and area of application