Sexual Violation By Unlawful Sexual Connection Flashcards

1
Q

Section

A

128(1)(b), Crimes Act 1961

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Penalty

A

20 years

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Ingredients

A

1) A Person
2) Has Unlawful Sexual Connection
3) Another Person

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Person

A

Gender Neutral. Proven by Judicial notice or circumstantial evidence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Unlawful Sexual Connection

Sec 128(3) Crimes Act 1961

A

Unlawful Sexual Connection:

Person A has unlawful sexual connection with person B if Person A has sexual connection with person B-

(a) without Person B’s consent to the connection, and
(b) without believing on reasonable grounds that person B consents to the connection.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Sexual Connection

Sec 2, Crimes Act 1961

A

Sexual Connection:

(a) connection effected by the introduction into the genitalia or anus of one person, otherwise than for genuine medical purposes, of-

(i) a part of the body of another person; or
(ii) an object held or manipulated by another person; or

(b) connection between the mouth or tongue of one person and a part of another person’s genitalia or anus; or
(c) the continuation of connection of a kind described in paragraph (a) or paragraph (b).

Sec 2 Crimes Act, 1961

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Penetration

A

Introduction and penetration have the same meaning.

Introduction to the slightest degree is enough to effect a connection.

Section 2(1A) Crimes Act 1961.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Proof of penetration is required

A

Proof may be provided by:

  • Complainants evidence
  • Medical examinations (DNA, injuries)
  • Accused’s admissions
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Genitalia - Sec 2, Crimes Act 1961.

A

Genitalia includes a surgically constructed or reconstructed organ, analogous to a naturally occurring male or female genitalia (whether the person concerned is male, female or of indeterminate sex).

Section 2, Crimes Act 1961.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

R v Koroheke

A

The genitalia comprise the reproduction organs, interior and exterior…. they include the vulva and the labia, both interior and exterior at the opening of the vagina.

R v Koroheke

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Consent

A

Consent is a person’s conscious and voluntary agreement to something desired or proposed by another.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

R v Cox

A

Consent must be full, voluntary, free and informed… freely and voluntarily given by a person in a position to form a rational judgement.

R v Cox

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Matters that do not constitute consent

Sec 128A, Crimes Act 1961

A
  • not protesting or offering physical resistance to use of force
  • application of force to self or others, threats of force to self or others, or fear of force to self or others
  • asleep or unconscious
  • so affected by drugs/alcohol they cannot consent
  • so affected by mental impairment they cannot consent
  • mistaken ID
  • mistaken as to the nature and quality of the act

Sec 128A, Crimes Act 1961

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Reasonable Grounds

A

The establishing of Reasonable Grounds is a three step process.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Subjective Test - Step 1

A

Absence of Consent

What was the complainant thinking at the time? Was she consenting?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Subjective Test - Step 2

A

Belief in Consent

If she wasn’t consenting, did the offender believe she was consenting. i.e. what was the offender thinking at the time.

17
Q

Objective Test - Step 3

A

Reasonable grounds for belief in consent

If the offender believed the complainant was consenting, was that belief reasonable in the circumstances. i.e. what would a reasonable person have believed if placed in the same position.

18
Q

R v Gutuama

A

Under the objective test, the crown must prove that “no reasonable person in the accused’s shoes could have thought that the complainant was consenting.

19
Q

Another Person

A

refer above