Sexual Selection I (intrasexual) Flashcards
define sexual dimorphism
- when opposite sexes differ
- example: different morphologies
when can you explain sexual dimorphism via natural selection
- when the trait/dimorphism is directly linked to the ability to survive in their environment
- other times its explained by sexual selection
define sexual selection
differential reproductive success due to variation in success at getting mates
natural vs sexual selection
- natural selection: focus on survival related traits
- sexual selection: focused on sexual related traits
natural vs sexual selection: which is directional, stabilizing, or disruptive?
- both can be all since they are context dependent
- if opposed, often results in stabilizing selection (common but not always the case)
how can sexual selection has been expanded to explain differences between males and females
- typical female: invest more in gametes bc eggs are more expensive
- typical male: really low investment in gametes bc sperm is less expensive
define female and male
- female: ability to produce eggs
- male: ability to produce sperm
define egg and sperm
- egg: larger gamete
- sperm: smaller gamete
what kind of selection led to having two sexes?
disruptive
explain how disruptive selection resulted in 2 sexes
- started with isogamy (gametes are all the same size) with their own variation
- accumulation of mutations then cause anisogamy (different sizes)
what produces asymmetric limits on reproductive success
differences in reproductive investment
explain the asymmetric limits on reproductive success - females
reproductive success will be limited by the number of eggs she can make
explain the asymmetric limits on reproductive success - male
reproductive success will be limited by the number of females he can mate with
which sex should have the greatest variation in reproductive success among individuals?
males since their success is determined by another individual
asymmetric limits on reproductive success - explain Bateman and Trivers (1948) prediction
- they predicted that sexual selection should be stronger on males than on females
- this is bc males have stronger variation and thus stronger selection
define hermaphrodites
- simultaneously having both male and female organs
- Protandrous (male -> female)
- Protogynous (female -> male)
Bateman and Trivers (1948) prediction - explain the Bateman’s gradient
- statistical relationship that measures how reproductive success is related to mating success
- has both male and female data
- x-axis: number of mates
- y-axis: number of offspring
- slope: fitness
Bateman gradient: hermaphrodite snail study - explain how sexual selection is stronger on sperm producers
- males: linear increase in fitness and more variation
- females: very little advantage with each additional mating and not a lot of variation
Bateman gradient - rough-skinned newts example
- researchers captured newts from breeding pond
- females were kept captive and induced to lay eggs
- used genetic techniques to assign reproductive success to males
Bateman gradient: rough-skinned newts example - describe gradient results
- males: not all males mate but slope increases linearly
- females: all females mate but slope is a lot flatter (not a lot of variation)
Bateman (1948) fruit fly experiment
- tested intra-sexual selection in Drosophila
- said males will be risker with mates since they don’t have limits on their gametes, unlike females
- tried to apply this to humans but this assumption is wrong
Bateman (1948) fruit fly experiment - why was this assumption wrong
- assumed that the optimal strategy for males for all species will be to mate with as many females as possible
- and that the optimal strategy for females would be to choose one male and mate with him only
Bateman (1948) assumption - example of how its wrong
- sex role reversal species
- in some species, males provide parental care
- Bateman gradient is flipped: females have more variation and males have less
explain Bateman’s view on selection between sexes
- males: more mating = more offspring = more fitness
- females: better genes/rearing = healthier offspring = more fitness
selection between sexes - how can we reframe Bateman’s view
- instead of males: members of the sex subject to strong sexual selection will be competitive
- instead of females: members of the sex subject to weak sexual selection will by choosy
define intersexual selection
between sexes (male and female)
define intrasexual selection
- between individuals (male and male)
- same-sex compeition
intrasexual selection - what does it drive the evolution of
- size dimorphism (competing sex is larger)
- stamina (competing sex has more)
- weaponry
intrasexual selection: what is most common in sexual dimorphism
- more colorful male birds and bigger male mammals
- birds: intersexual selection
- mammals: intrasexual selection
intrasexual selection: iguana example - can natural selection explain sexual dimorphism
- no
- a lot of males are bigger than the optimum
intrasexual selection: iguana example - what might explain the fact that many of the males are larger than the “optimum size”?
sexual selection
intrasexual selection: iguana example - what traits does it favor and what kind of selection is present
- large body size
- stabilizing
intrasexual selection: iguana example - how is sexual selection favoring large body size
- males establish territories on areas where females bask
- males fight to maintain territories (bigger size = more fights won)
- ability to hold territory through combat matches fitness and reproductive sucess
intrasexual selection: iguana example - what happens due to a skew in fitness among males?
- alternative mating tactics
- males with no territories will try anything to get some fitness (some is better than none)
intrasexual selection: iguana example - what are the alternative mating tactics
- territorial
- non-territorial satellite
- female mimic sneaker
intrasexual selection: alternative mating tactics - what are satellite males
they ejaculate early so that some sperm will make it into the female even if population is interrupted by the territorial male
intrasexual selection: alternative mating tactics - sneakers
involves a male sneaking up on a female to fertilize her without directly competing with dominant males
non-combative intrasexual male competition
- post-copulatory (sperm) competition
- alternative mating tactics
- female manipulation through mate guarding
- copulatory plugs
- infanticide
post-copulatory (sperm) competition - amount
- sperm production increase
- ex: Medflies produce more sperm when raised with rivals vs in isolation
non-combative intrasexual male competition - post-copulatory (sperm) competition
can select for:
- amount
- sperm attributes
- mechanism
- removal
post-copulatory (sperm) competition - sperm attributes
- higher sperm velocity
- ex: guppies
post-copulatory (sperm) competition - mechanism
- order of matting effects which male’s offspring is which
- the last gets most offspring
- ex: guppies
post-copulatory (sperm) competition - removal
- males evolved scooping out sperm of previous mating
- ex: dragonflies
what is sexual conflict
two sexes have conflicting optimal fitness strategies concerning reproduction
post-copulatory (sperm) competition: mechanism - is there a possibility for sexual conflict?
- yes, genital arms race
- ex: complexity and elaboration of Muscovy duck penises
post-copulatory (sperm) competition: mechanism and sexual conflict - genital arms race
- forced copulation results in females evolving internal control (vaginal shape)
- then male evolves to circumvent control resulting in females evolving new control
- keeps going and going
post-copulatory (sperm) competition: removal - is there a possibility for sexual conflict
- yes
- ex: dragonfly females play dead to avoid copulation with unwanted male
non-combative intrasexual male competition - mate guarding
- after mating, the sperm producer guards the egg producer to make sure all the eggs are fertilized
- potential for sexual conflict
non-combative intrasexual male competition - copulatory plug
- male plugs female reproductive tract to prevent mating
- potential for sexual conflict
non-combative intrasexual male competition - infanticide
- this is adaptive bc individual is killing unrelated offspring
- potential for sexual conflict: yes - females band together to fight males