Sexual Offences Flashcards
Sexual Violation by Rape
List Act, Section, imprisonment and ingredients.
Sexual Violation by rape
Section 128(1)(a), Crimes Act 1961
20 Years Imprisonment.
Ingredients
A person
Rapes
Another Person
Sexual Violation by rape
Section 128(1)(a), Crimes Act 1961
20 Years Imprisonment.
List the Ingredients along with titles of definitions and case law
Sexual Violation by rape
Section 128(1)(a), Crimes Act 1961
20 Years Imprisonment.
Ingredients
A person
Person
Rapes
Rape S.128(2) Crimes Act 1961
Penetration S.2(1A) Crimes Act 1961
Proof of penetration is required
Genitalia S.2 Crimes Act 1961
R v Koroheke
Penis S.2 Crimes act 1961
Consent
R v Cox
Matters that do not constitute Consent S.128A Crimes Act 1961
Reasonable Grounds
- Subjective test Absence of concent
- Subjective test 2 Belief in consent
- Objective test 3 Reasonable grounds for belief in consent
R v Gutuama
Another Person
Define ingredient “A person.”
A Person
Gender nutral. Proven by judicial notice or circumstancial evidence.
Whats the Defination of
Rape
Rape; Sec. 128(2), Crimes Act 1961
Person A rapes Person B if Person A has sexual connection with person B,
effected by the penetration of Person B’s genitalia by Persons A’s penis - ,
(a) without person B’s consent to the connection,
and
(b) without believing on reasonable grounds that person B consents to the
connection
Whats the Defination of
Penetration
Penetration
Sec. 2(1A), Crimes Act 1961
Introduction and penetration have the same meaning.
Introduction to the slightest degree is enough to effect a connection.
How do you prove “Proof of penitration is required“
Proof of penetration is required:
Proof may be provided by:
- the complainant’s evidence
- medical examination, (DNA, injuries)
- accused’s admissions.
Whats the defination of Genitalia
Genitalia,
Sec.2, Crimes Act 1961
Genitalia includes a surgically constructed or reconstructed organ analogous to naturally occurring male or female genitalia (whether the person concerned is male, female, or of indeterminate sex)
What is the caselaw for Genitalia
R v Koroheke
The genitalia comprise the reproduction organs, interior and exterior … they include the vulva [and] the labia, both interior and exterior, at the opening of the vagina.
What is the defination for Penis
Penis
Sec. 2, Crimes Act 1961
Penis includes a surgically constructed or reconstructed organ analogous to a naturally occurring penis (whether the person concerned is male, female or of indeterminate sex).
What is the defination for Consent
Consent:
“Consent” is a person’s conscious and voluntary agreement to something desired or proposed by another.
Discuss the caselaw regarding Concent
R v Cox
Consent must be “full, voluntary, free and informed … freely and voluntarily given by a person in a position to form a rational judgment.”
List the matters that do not consititue concent
Matters that do not constitute consent - Sec. 128A, Crimes Act 1961
- not protesting or offering physical resistance to use of force,
- application of force to self or other, threats of force to self or others, or fear
of force to self or others
- asleep or unconscious
- so affected by drugs/alcohol they cannot consent
- so affected by mental or physical impairment they cannot consent
- mistaken ID
- mistaken as to nature and quality of the act
(Only include those relevant to the scenario, if any)
Discuss Reasonable Grounds in relation to Rape:
Reasonable Grounds:
The establishing of reasonable grounds is a three step process
Subjective Test - Step 1 - Absence of Consent
What was the complainant thinking at the time? Was s/he consenting?
Subjective Test – Step 2 - Belief in Consent
If s/he were not consenting did the offender believe the complainant was
consenting? ie what was the offender thinking at the time.
Objective Test – Step 3 - Reasonable grounds for belief in consent
If the offender believed the complainant was consenting, was that belief
reasonable in the circumstances. Ie what would a reasonable person have
believed if placed in the same position as the defendant?
Discuss the caselaw for reasonable grounds for consent
R v Gutuama
Under the objective test the Crown must prove that “no reasonable person in the accused’s shoes could have thought that [the complainant] was consenting.”
Define “another person”
Person:
Gender neutral. Proven by Judicial notice or circumstantial evidence.
Sexual Violation by unlawful sexual connection
Section, Act, imprisonment.
Ingredients
Sexual Violation By Unlawful Sexual Connection
Section 128(1)(b), Crimes Act 1961 20 years imprisonment
Ingredients
A person
Has Unlawful Sexual Connection
with another person