Sexual Offences Flashcards
No presumption because of age
s127 No presumption because of age
There is no presumption of law that a person is incapable of sexual connection because of his or her age.
Define - Sexual Violation
Sexual violation - s128(1) CA61
act of a person who—
(a) rapes another person; or
(b) has unlawful sexual connection with another person.
Define - Rape
Rape - s128(2) CA61
Person A rapes person B if person A has sexual connection with person B, effected by the penetration of person B’s genitalia by person A’s penis,—
(a) without person B’s consent to the connection; and
(b) without believing on reasonable grounds that person B consents to the connection.
Define - Unlawful Sexual Connection
Unlawful Sexual Connection - s128(3) CA61
Person A has unlawful sexual connection with person B if person A has sexual connection with person B—
(a) without person B’s consent to the connection; and
(b) without believing on reasonable grounds that person B consents to the connection.
Define - Sexual Connection (s2 CA61)
Sexual Connection - s2 CA61
sexual connection means—
(a) connection effected by the introduction into the genitalia or anus of one person, otherwise than for genuine medical purposes, of—
(i) a part of the body of another person; or
(ii) an object held or manipulated by another person; or
(b) connection between the mouth or tongue of one person and a part of another person’s genitalia or anus; or
(c) the continuation of connection of a kind described in paragraph (a) or paragraph (b)
Define - Genetalia
Case law
Genitalia
Section 2, Crimes Act 1961
Genitalia includes a surgically constructed or reconstructed organ analogous to naturally occurring male or female genitalia (whether the person concerned is male, female, or of indeterminate sex)
R v Koroheke
The genitalia comprise the reproduction organs, interior and exterior … they include the vulva [and] the labia, both interior and exterior, at the opening of the vagina.
Define - Penetration
S2(1A), Crimes Act 1961
introduction to the slightest degree is enough to effect a connection
Define - Penis
Penis
Section 2, Crimes Act 1961
Penis includes a surgically constructed or reconstructed organ analogous to a naturally occurring penis (whether the person concerned is male, female, or of indeterminate sex)
Discuss - Matters not constituting to consent
s128A Allowing sexual activity does not amount to consent in some circumstances
(1) A person does not consent to sexual activity just because he or she does not protest or offer physical resistance to the activity.
(2) A person does not consent to sexual activity if he or she allows the activity because of—
(a) force applied to him or her or some other person; or
(b) the threat (express or implied) of the application of force to him or her or some other person; or
(c) the fear of the application of force to him or her or some other person.
(3) A person does not consent to sexual activity if the activity occurs while he or she is asleep or unconscious.
(4) A person does not consent to sexual activity if the activity occurs while he or she is so affected by alcohol or some other drug that he or she cannot consent or refuse to consent to the activity.
(5) A person does not consent to sexual activity if the activity occurs while he or she is affected by an intellectual, mental, or physical condition or impairment of such a nature and degree that he or she cannot consent or refuse to consent to the activity.
(6) One person does not consent to sexual activity with another person if he or she allows the sexual activity because he or she is mistaken about who the other person is.
(7) A person does not consent to an act of sexual activity if he or she allows the act because he or she is mistaken about its nature and quality.
(8) This section does not limit the circumstances in which a person does not consent to sexual activity.
Discuss - Reasonable grounds (Subjective and Objective Tests)
Case Law
Reasonable grounds (subjective & objective tests)
- Whether or not the complainant was consenting is a subjective test from the complainant’s point of view, i.e. what was the complainant thinking at the time?
- If it is established that the complainant was not consenting, the next question is whether or not the defendant believed he/she was consenting at the time i.e. what was the defendant thinking at the time?
- The objective test is: what would a reasonable person have believed if placed in the same position as the defendant?
R v Gutuama
Under the objective test the Crown must prove that “no reasonable person in the accused’s shoes could have thought that [the complainant] was consenting”.
Discuss age (case law)
R v Forrest and Forrest
“The best evidence possible in the circumstances should be adduced by the prosecution in proof of [the victim’s] age.”
Discuss - Indecent Act
Case law
Indecent Act
An act that is “indecent” has sexual connotations and involves conduct directed at a person that is offensive to public moral values.
R v Court
Indecency means “conduct that right-thinking people will consider an affront to the sexual modesty of [the complainant]”.
Indecent Assault
- Define (case law - R v Leeson)
- Ingredients
- 3 things crown must prove
s135 CA61 Indecent Assault - every one is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 7 years who indecently assaults another person.
R v Leeson
“The definition of ’indecent assault’ … is an assault accompanied with circumstances of indecency …”
Indecent Assault
In these cases the Crown must prove that:
1. the defendant intentionally assaulted the complainant
2. the circumstances accompanying the assault were indecent
3. the defendant intended the conduct that a reasonable person would find indecent.
Incest
Incest - s130 CA61
(1) Sexual connection is incest if—
(a) it is between 2 people whose relationship is that of parent and child, siblings, half-siblings, or grandparent and grandchild; and
(b) the person charged knows of the relationship.
(2) Every one of or over the age of 16 years who commits incest is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 10 years.
Defences for sexual conduct with a young person
It is a defence to a charge under section 134 if the person charged proves that,—
(a) before the time of the act concerned, he or she had taken reasonable steps to find out whether the young person concerned was of or over the age of 16 years; and
(b) at the time of the act concerned, he or she believed on reasonable grounds that the young person was of or over the age of 16 years; and
(c) the young person consented.