Sexual Offences Flashcards

1
Q

Sexual violation by Rape

A

CA 61, s128(1)(a)
20 years

  1. A person
  2. Rapes
  3. Another person
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Sexual violation by unlawful sexual connection

A

CA 61, s128(1)(b)
20 years

  1. A person
  2. Has unlawful sexual connection
  3. With another person
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Assault with intent to commit sexual violation

A

CA 61
s129(2)

  1. A person
  2. Assaults
  3. another person
  4. With intent to commit sexual violation of the other person
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Sexual conduct with a child under 12

A

CA
s132(1) (2) (3)

  1. A person

(1) Has sexual connection with
(2) attempts to have sexual connection with
(3) does an indecent Act on

  1. a child
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Sexual conduct with a young person under 16

A

CA 6
S134(1) (2)(3)

  1. A person

(1) has sexual connectio with
(2) attempts to have sexual connection with
(3) does an indecent Act on

  1. a young person
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Indecent Assault

A

CA 61
S135

  1. A person
  2. Indecently assaults
  3. Another person
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Sexual violation

A

Non-consensual sexual connection

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Rape

A

Sexual violation that involves the non-consensual penetration of the complainants genitalia by the defendants penis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Unlawful sexual connection

A

Wider meaning which includes any form of non-consensual penetration or oral connection with a persons genitalia or anus

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What must be proved in all sexual violation??

Subjective and objective tests

A
  1. There was an intentional act by the offender involving sexual connection with the complainant, AND
  2. the complainant did not consent to the sexual act (Subjective 1), AND
  3. the offender did not believe the complainant was consenting (Subjective 2), OR
  4. If he did believe she was consenting, the grounds for which a belief was not reasonable (Objective)

R v Gutuama - “no reasonable person in the accuseds shoes would have thought the complainant was consenting”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Sexual connection

A

A. Introduction into the genitalia or anus of a person, otherwise for genuine medical purposes, of

  • A part of the body of another person OR
  • an object held or manipulated by another person OR

B. Connection between the mouth or tongue of one person and a part of another persons genitalia or anus

C. The continuation of a kind described

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Proof of penetration/Introduction

A
  • the complainants evidence
  • medical examination, including physical injury and DNA
  • the defendant’s admission
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Genitalia

A

Includes surgically constructed or reconstructed organ analogous to naturally occurring Male or female genitalia

R v Koroheke - comprises the reproduction organs, interior and exterior.. includes the vulva and labia, both interior and exterior, at the opening of the vagina

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Consent

A

Is a persons full and voluntary agreement to something desired or proposed by someone

R v Cox - consent must be full, voluntary, free and informed.. freely and voluntarily given by a person in a position to form rational judgement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly