Sexual violation by Rape
CA 61, s128(1)(a)
20 years
Sexual violation by unlawful sexual connection
CA 61, s128(1)(b)
20 years
Assault with intent to commit sexual violation
CA 61
s129(2)
Sexual conduct with a child under 12
CA
s132(1) (2) (3)
(1) Has sexual connection with
(2) attempts to have sexual connection with
(3) does an indecent Act on
Sexual conduct with a young person under 16
CA 6
S134(1) (2)(3)
(1) has sexual connectio with
(2) attempts to have sexual connection with
(3) does an indecent Act on
Indecent Assault
CA 61
S135
Sexual violation
Non-consensual sexual connection
Rape
Sexual violation that involves the non-consensual penetration of the complainants genitalia by the defendants penis
Unlawful sexual connection
Wider meaning which includes any form of non-consensual penetration or oral connection with a persons genitalia or anus
What must be proved in all sexual violation??
Subjective and objective tests
R v Gutuama - “no reasonable person in the accuseds shoes would have thought the complainant was consenting”
Sexual connection
A. Introduction into the genitalia or anus of a person, otherwise for genuine medical purposes, of
B. Connection between the mouth or tongue of one person and a part of another persons genitalia or anus
C. The continuation of a kind described
Proof of penetration/Introduction
Genitalia
Includes surgically constructed or reconstructed organ analogous to naturally occurring Male or female genitalia
R v Koroheke - comprises the reproduction organs, interior and exterior.. includes the vulva and labia, both interior and exterior, at the opening of the vagina
Consent
Is a persons full and voluntary agreement to something desired or proposed by someone
R v Cox - consent must be full, voluntary, free and informed.. freely and voluntarily given by a person in a position to form rational judgement