Arson Flashcards

1
Q

Arson (causes loss/obtain benefit)

A

CA
s267(1)(c)

  1. Intentionally
  2. Damages by fire OR damages by means of any explosive
  3. Any immovable property OR vehicle OR ship OR aircraft
  4. With Intent
  5. To obtain any benefit OR cause loss to any other person
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Arson - (danger to life)

A

CA 61, s267(1)(a)

  1. Intentionally OR Recklessly
  2. Damages by Fire OR Damages by means of any Explosive
  3. Any property
  4. If he or she knows OR ought to know that danger to life is likely to ensue
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Arson (vehicle/imm prop/no interest)

A

CA
s267(1)(b)

  1. Intentionally OR Recklessly
  2. And without claim of right
  3. Damages by fireOR Damages by means of any explosive
  4. Any immovable property or any vehicle, ship or aircraft
  5. in which that person has no interest
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Intent

A

Must be intention:
. To commit the act, and
. To get a specific result

Must be deliberate act.

Case Law- R v Collister 
Can be inferred from circumstantial evidence 
. Actions or words before,during, after
. Surrounding 
. Nature of the act itself
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Reckless

A

Cameron v R

R v Tipple - offender must know of or have q conscious appreciation of the relevant risk, and requires “a deliberate decision to run the risk”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

R v Archer

A

Property mat be damaged if it suffers permanent or temporary physical harm or permenant or temporary impairment of its use or value

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Fire

A

Combustion - chemical reaction between fuel and oxygen, triggered by heat

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Explosive

A

Arms Act 1983

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Immovable

A

Fixed in place and unable to be moved, even though it may be possible to make it moveable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Knows or ought to know - defendants degree of knowledge

A

Subjective test - what was the defendant thinking at the time? Did they know his actions would likely endanger life?

Insufficient… then ask..

Objective- what would a reasonable person have thought in the same circumstances? Would a reasonable person have recognized the risk?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Danger to life

A

Human life - danger must to be to someone other than the defendant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Likely to ensure

A

Defendant merely has to know there is a chance, or risk, of danger to life - is a form of recklessness rather than ateuxt knowledge

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

claim.of right

A

At the time of alleged offence, offender had a belief in possessory or proprietary right to property related to offence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Vehicle

A

Contrivance equipped with wheels, runners or tracks on which it moves

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Ship

A

Vessel used in navigation, however propelled

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Aircraft

A

Machine that can derive support in the atmosphere from reactions of the air

17
Q

Interest in property

A

R v Wilson - tenancy of a property