Sexual Offence Liabilities, Case Law and definitions Flashcards
Section 128(1)(a) Crimes Act 1961
Sexual Violation by Rape
- A person
- Rapes
- Another person
Section 128(1)(b) Crimes Act 1961
Sexual Violation by Unlawful Sexual Connection
- A person
- Has unlawful sexual connection
- With another person
Section 129(2) Crimes Act 1961
Assault with intent to commit sexual violation
- A person
- Assaults
- Another person
- With intent to commit sexual violation of the other person
Section 132 Crimes Act 1961
Sexual Connection with a child under 12
- A person
1) has sexual connection with
2) Attempts to have sexual connection with
3) Does an indecent act on - A child
Section 134 Crimes Act 1961
Sexual Conduct with a Young Person Under 16
- A person
1) Has sexual connection with
2) Attempts to have sexual connection with
3) Does an indecent act on - A young person
Section 135 Crimes Act 1961
Indecent Assault
- A person
- Indecently Assaults
- Another person
R V KOROHEKE - Genetalia
Application: Genitalia
The gentalia comprise the reproductive organs, interior and exterior. They include the vulva [and] the labia, both interior and exterior, at the opening of the vagina.
R V COX
Application: Consent
Consent must be “full, voluntary, free and informed. Freely and voluntarily given by a person in a position to form a rational judgement”
R V GUTUAMA
Application: Consent
Under the objective test the crown must prove that “no reasonable person in the accused’s shoes could have that that [the complainant] was consenting”
R V FORREST AND FORREST
Application: Proving age
“the best evidence possible in the circumstances should be adduced by the prosecution in proof of [the victims] age”
R V COURT
Application: Indecency
conduct that right-thinking people will consider an affront to the sexual modesty of the complainant
R V DUNN
Application: Indecency
Indecency must be judged in light of the time, place and circumstances. It must be something more than trifling, and be sufficient to “warrant the sanction of the law”.
R V LEESON
Application: Indecent Assault
The definition of ‘indecent assault’ is an assault accompanied with circumstances of indecency.
R V NORRIS
Application: Indecent Assault (defence)
If a person who is charged with indecent assault is able to establish that they honestly believed that the complainant was consenting, they are entitled to be acquitted even though the grounds of his belief were unreasonable.
Sexual violation by rape - act and section
Crimes Act 1961, Section 128(1)(a)
Sexual violation by rape - ingredients
Crimes Act 1961, Section 128(1)(a)
- A person
- Rapes
- Another person
Sexual violation by unlawful sexual connection - act and section
Crimes Act 1961 - Section 128(1)(b)
Sexual violation by unlawful sexual connection - ingredients
Crimes Act 1961 - Section 128(1)(b)
- A person
- Has unlawful sexual connection
- With another person
Assault with intent to commit sexual violation - act and section
Crimes Act 1961 - section 129(2)
Assault with intent to commit sexual violation - ingredients
Crimes Act 1961 - section 129(2)
- A person
- Assaults
- Another person
- With intent to commit sexual violation of the other person
Sexual conduct with a child under 12 - act and section
Crimes Act 1961 - section 132
Sexual conduct with a child under 12 - ingredients
Crimes Act 1961 - section 132
- A person
- (a) Has sexual connection with OR
- (b) attempts to have sexual connection with, OR
- (c) Does an indecent act on
- A child
Sexual conduct with a young person under 16 - act and section
Crimes Act 1961 - Section 134
Sexual conduct with a young person under 16 - ingredients
Crimes Act 1961 - Section 134
- A person
- (a) has sexual connection with, OR
- (b) Attempts to have sexual connection with, or
- (c) Does an indecent act on
- A young person
Indecent assault - act and section
Crimes Act 1961 - Section 135
Indecent assault - ingredients
Crimes Act 1961 - section 135
- A person
- Indecently assaults
- Another person
R V HARPUR
The court may view the conduct cumulatively up to the point the conduct ends to determine whether it is sufficient for an attempt
R V KOROHEKE - Consent
Distinguish between consent freely given and submission by a woman to something unwanted but unavoidable (for example submission because she is scared - not true consent)
COX V R - Children and consent
We do not exclude the possibility that 10 and 11 year olds can consent to sex - though it is rare. Even where she indicates agreement, no reasonable adult would have grounds to believe she could consent.
What must prosecution prove in indecent assault cases?
- The defendant INTENTIONALLY assaulted the complainant
- The CIRCUMSTANCES accompanying the assault were indecent
- The defendant INTENDED the conduct that a reasonable person would find indecent.
If the issue of consent is raised, the prosecution must prove:
- The complainant did not consent to the assault, and:
- The defendant did not honestly believe the complainant was consenting
What must the prosecution prove for all cases of sexual violation?
- That there was an intentional act by the offender involving sexual connection with the complainant AND
- The complainant did not consent to the sexual act AND
- The offender did not believe the complainant was consenting OR
- If he did believe she was consenting, the grounds for such a belief were not reasonable
How can proof of penetration be established?
- Through the complainants evidence
- Medical examination
- The defendants admissions
Definition: Genetalia
Include the penis and testicles of a male and the vagina and vulva of a female
What is a ‘continuation’?
It captures situations where sexual activity is commenced consensually, but consent is later withdrawn
Definition: Consent
A persons conscious and voluntary agreement to something proposed by another
When is consent relevant?
The material time where consent and believe in consent is to be considered is at the time the act actually took place
Rape defined:
Sexual connection that involves the penetration of the complainants genetalia by the offenders penis (all other types are captured in 128(1)(b)
Sexual Connection Defined:
Section 128(1)(b) captures all forms of non consensual connection, other than rape.
Therefore it includes:
- Penetration of a persons genitalia or anus bu a part of another persons body (such as finger in the vagina or penis in the anus)
- Penetration of a persons genitalia or anus by an object held or manipulated by the other person
- Touching of a persons genitalia or anus by another persons mouth or tongue
To be guilty of an attempt to commit an offence what must we prove?
- That the defendant INTENDED to commit the offence AND
- He/She took a REAL and SUBSTANTIAL step towards achieving that aim
Section 72 attempts
R V COLLISTER
Intent derived from circumstantial evidence:
- Surrounding circumstances
- Words / actions from the defendant before, during and after
- The nature of the act itself
What must you prove for assault with intent to commit sexual violation?
That at the time the defendant assaulted the complainant, he:
- Intended to have sexual connection with the complainant AND
- The complainant did not consent to the sexual connection AND
- The defendant did not believe on reasonable grounds that the complainant was consenting
Consent of a child
There is no statutory “cut off” age below which a child is deemed incapable of consenting - therefore whether they are consenting will be deemed on the circumstances.
COX V R held that it would exceptional and rare that a child under 12 could give consent.
The younger the child, the less likely that any consent argument will be valid
CONSENT IS NOT A DEFENCE FOR SEXUAL CONDUCT WITH A CHILD UNDER 12
Definition: Child
A person under the age of 12 years old - gender neutral
Definition: Indecency
An act that is “indecent” has sexual connotations and involves conduct directed at a person that is offensive to public moral values
Section 134A Defence
Defence to Sexual Conduct with a Young Person Under 16
It is a defence if the defendant:
- Took all reasonable steps to ascertain that the young person was at least 16 AND
- They believed on reasonable grounds that the young person as at least 16 AND
- The young person consented
What must the prosecution prove for Indecent assault?
- The defendant INTENTIONALLY assaulted the complainant
- The CIRCUMSTANCES accompanying the assault were indecent
- The defendant INTENDED the conduct that a reasonable person would find indecent
Is belief in consent sufficient for indecent assault?
An honest belief alone is sufficient even if it is not reasonable
Timings of medical forensic examinations - What are they?
Acute - Reported within 1-7 days - A medical examiner must be contacted ASAP especially if it’s within 24 hours
Non Acute - Reported within 7 days - 6 months - Refer to SAATS regardless of time delay.
Historic - 6 Months plus afterward - Still refer to SAATS to determine whether they may benefit from their care