Sex ratios and Wolbachia Flashcards

1
Q

1:1 sex ratio is a constraint imposed by what?

A

Sex chromosomes (equal segregation in the heterogametic sex)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Therefore 1:1 sex ratios can be overcome if sex is not determined by sex chromosomes. True or false?

A

True

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Even with sex chromosomes they can be distorted. True or false?

A

True.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Why is a 1:1 sex ratio beneficial? Give 2 reasons.

A
  1. It maximises offspring and grand-offspring (as everyone will have a chance to mate)
  2. There is lower variation in fitness means less individuals removed by selection
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the 1:1 sex ratio often called?

A

Fisherian sex ratio

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What does Fisherian sex ratio refer to?

A

The primary sex ratio (SR immediately after fertilisation)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are the 4 major assumptions under Fisherian sex ratio?

A
  1. The cost of parental investment in both sexes is the same
  2. There is random mating (or ‘population-wide competition for mates’)
  3. Males and females have similar pay-offs in the environment
  4. Parents do not control the offspring sex ratio
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Why does selection favour a 1:1 sex ratio?

A

The sex with the highest reproductive value is selected for; this is the rarer sex. Therefore deviations from equilibrium are corrected for.
E.g. if there are few females then selection will favour females, bringing ratio back to 1:1

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What type of selection maintains 1:1 sex ratios?

A

Frequency-dependent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Selection will favour modifiers that return the ratio to 1:1. True or false?

A

True.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Fisherian sex ratio assumes that there are equal costs for producing sons and daughters. Is always this true?

A

No; males are often more costly to produce

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Give a referenced example that shows males are more costly to produce.

A

Clutton-Brock (1981):

Red Deer, males often die in utero. Mothers corrected for this by providing a male-biased feeding rate.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Fisherian sex ratio assumes that mating is random/there is population-wide mate competition. Is always this true?

A

Mating is non-random/mate competition can be local, i.e. inbreeding.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

How does inbreeding affect the sex ratio?

A

It favours the production of a female-biased sex ratio as fewer/a single male is needed to fertilise sisters. Sperm competition is between relatives, meaning it is reduced.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Give a referenced example of inbreeding affecting the sex ratio.

A

Werren (1983)
N. vitripennis (parasitoid wasp), female lays eggs in a single host. If she is only one to use that host, flightless brothers fertilise sisters before dispersal.
As no. of foundresses using same host increases, so does male bias in the SR of offspring as more sperm competition.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Fisherian sex ratio assumes that males and females have similar environmental pay-offs. Is this always true?

A

No.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Give a referenced example of differential pay-offs for males and females.

A

Krebs, Davies and West (2012):
Dominance in Red Deer, dominant females have access to more resources and therefore it is better to have sons as they are more expensive. Daughters are produced by subordinate females that have access to fewer resources.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Fisherian sex ratio assumes parents do not control the offspring sex ratio. Is this always true?

A

No.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Give a referenced example to demonstrate how parents can alter offspring sex ratio.

A

Komdeur et al. (1997):
Seychelles warblers, female offspring stay with the parents as helpers.
In good territories daughters produced as can bring more food in.
In bad territories sons produced as they dispersed and rents don’t have to share.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Deviations from 1:1 sex ratio can be induced by ESD. Why?

A

The offspring control their own sex by responding to environmental cues

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Give a referenced example of ESD.

A

Warner and Shine (2008):

Jacky lizards, females produced in extreme temps. as fare better than males, males produced in intermediate temperatures

22
Q

When is ESD favoured? Give 2 conditions.

A
  1. There is a differential pay-off between the sexes (i.e. different environmental conditions favour different sexes)
  2. There is no parental control over offspring environment
23
Q

Sex ratio can also be controlled by eusociality. True or false?

A

True.

24
Q

Fisherian sex ratios assume autosomal control and Mendelian inheritance. Is this always what happens?

A

No.

25
Q

What are the two types of sex ratio distorter (SRD)?

A
  1. Sex-linked drivers

2. Cytoplasmic elements

26
Q

Cytoplasm is always transmitted by males. True or false?

A

False, it is only ever transmit by females.

27
Q

What sex do cytoplasmic elements prefer? Why?

A

Females as they cannot be transmit by males

28
Q

What are the three main ways in which cytoplasmic elements can bias the sex ratio to produce females?

A
  1. Parthenogenesis
  2. Feminisation
  3. Male killing
29
Q

What is parthenogenesis?

A

When unfertilised eggs develop as females.

30
Q

Give a referenced example of cytoplasmic elements inducing parthenogenesis.

A

Stouthammer et al. (2010):

Trichogramma genus of parasitoid wasp carries Wolbachia bacteria.
Wasps are haplodiploid.
Bacteria cause diploidisation of unfertilised eggs by failure of the 1st or 2nd mitotic division, produces females.

31
Q

In Stouthammer et al. (2010), how can it be proven that parthenogenesis in parasitoid wasps is attributed to Wolbachia infection?

A

It is corrected by application of antibiotics

32
Q

What did Kremer et al. (2009) discover about parthenogenesis?

A

Host and bacteria co-evolve during parthenogenesis.
A. tabida (parasitoid wasp) needs Wolbachia for oogenesis, are sterile without bacteria.
A. japonica females lose interest in sex/do not produce sex pheromones without Wolbachia.

33
Q

Who described PSR-B?

A

Stouthammer et al. (2001)

34
Q

Stouthammer et al. (2001):

What is PSR-B and what does it do?

A

Parasitic chromosome B balances the effect of parthenogenesis in T. kaykai.

PSR-B causes all paternal chromosomes in diploid eggs EXCEPT ITSELF to degenerate, producing haploid males.

35
Q

Is PSR-B a selfish element? Why, why not?

A

Yes, it is only transmit through males and so produces males.

36
Q

What is feminisation?

A

When genetic males develop as functional phenotypic females.

37
Q

Give a referenced example of feminisation.

A

Rigaud et al. (1997):
A. vulgare (woodlice) are female heterogametic. Wolbachia prevents differentiation of the androgen gland that releases male hormones and stimulates testes formation.

38
Q

Rigaud et al. (1997):

What is feminising factor F?

A

A selfish element from the Wolbachia genome that has inserted into the host, causes female-biased broods even in the absence of Wolbachia

39
Q

What is male killing?

A

Females lay mixed broods but male embryos fail to develop.

40
Q

Bandi et al. (2001):

By killing males how can bacteria end up in females?

A

Direct transmissions, for example by horizontal gene transfer; some bacteria live within a microsporidian protozoan that lives inside a mosquito. Bacteria kill the mosquito so protozoan host must move into a female.

41
Q

Bandi et al. (2001):

How are the benefits of male killing kin selective?

A

Wolbachia in ladybirds:

Eggs laid in clutches, so dead males provide food for hatched sisters. This benefits the Wolbachia they carry which are clonal relatives.

42
Q

Some mechanisms evolve to suppress male killing. Who studied H. bolina butterflies?

A

Hornett et al. (2006)

43
Q

What did Hornett et al. (2006)find in H. bolina populations?

A

Thailand and Philippines had normal sex ratios.

Polynesian populations were female-biased.

44
Q

Hornett et al. (2006):

All populations were infected with Wolbachia, yet Thai/Philippine populations did not show sex ratio distortion. Why? How did this become apparent?

A

Thai/Philippine pops had a dominant mutation that suppressed male-killing.

Was discovered through genetic crossing, as individuals in the F2 showed male-killing.

45
Q

What is cytoplasmic male sterility (CMS) in plants?

A

Chimeric genes in the mitochondria cause apoptosis of male tissues. Therefore pollen formation fails. More resources can then be directed to female repro tissues.

46
Q

Is CMS a cytoplasmic element?

A

No. The mitochondria are their own organelles that are transmit by cytoplasm, the genes for CMS are not free in the cytoplasm.

47
Q

In CMS why do the mitochondria kill the male reproductive organs?

A

They are matrilineally inherited

48
Q

What kind of population does CMS produce?

A

A gynodioecious one, composed of hermaphrodites (normal condition) and females (male-sterile individuals)

49
Q

What did Touzet and Budar have to say about CMS?

A

Thought normal condition could be restored by PPR genes (pentatricopeptide repeat) which are leucine-rich and facilitate unequal crossing over, creating clusters of paralogues

50
Q

Cytoplasmic selfish elements like Wolbachia exploit what in a) hymenopterans and b) crustaceans?

A

a) Haplodiploidy

b) Androgen gland formation