sex offences Flashcards
sexual violation: what must be proved
- the offenders acts were intentional.
- The complainant did not consent.
- The offender did not believe they had consent.
- If the offender believed he had consent, the grounds for that consent were unreasonable.
128(4) Crimes act
being in a spousal relationship is not a defence to sexual violation.
definition of sexual connection
connection effected by the introduction into the genitalia or anus of one person, for other than genuine medical purposes;
a part of the body of another person
an object held or manipulated by another person
connection between the mouth or tongue of one person and a part of another persons genitalia or anus
the continuation of connection as described above.
definition of penetration
introduction into
how is the degree of penetration relevant
you must prove penetration however the degree of penetration is not relevant, any degree no matter how slight or fleeting is sufficient.
any body part of object manipulated, between the complainants labia is sufficient for penetration.
How do you prove penetration
the complainants evidence.
medical examination, including physical injuries and DNA evidence.
The defendants admissions.
what is genitalia
the external reproductive organs of a person.
penis and testicles for a male
vulva and labia for a female.
Included surgically constructed/ reconstructed sexual organs
R V KOROHEKE
The genitalia comprise of the reproductive organs, interior and exterior.
including the vulva, labia, both interior and exterior, and the opening of the vagina.
object held or manipulated defintion
anything other than a part of his body used by the offender to penetrate the complainant genitalia or anus
examples of genuine medical purposes
cervical screenings and prostate exams
DEFINITION OF CONTINUATION
a sexual activity that started consensually but consent was later withdrawn, however the defendant failed to to stop the act
no presumption because of age
any person is capable of being involved in sexual connection, therefore it is not a defence to sex related charges to say that either of the parties were too young or too old to have sexual connection.
definition of consent
consent is a persons conscious and voluntary agreement to something desired or proposed by another
R V COX
consent must be full free informed voluntary, freely given by a person in a position to form a rational judgement.
reluctant consent
consent can be given reluctantly.
if there is no fear of the application of force or the result of actual or threatened force then the act of sexual connection would not be rape
R V GUTUAMA
under the objective test the crown must prove that no reasonable person in the accused shoes could have thought that the complainant was consenting
When is consent relevant
at the time the acts actually took place
Examples of invalid consent
Lack of resistance does not equal consent
fear of force or actual force to them or another person
asleep / unconscious
affected by alcohol/substances to the point that they can not make a rational decision.
has intellectual/ mental or physical condition that affects their ability to make a rational decision.
mistaken identity.
mistaken nature/quality of act
R V KOROHEKE- consent freely given vs submission
It is important to distinguish between consent that is freely given and submission by a woman to what she may regard as unwanted but unavoidable. For example submission by a woman because she is frightened of what might happen if she does not give in or co-operate, is not true consent.
what charge could be considered if the threshold for sexual violation has not been met but the defendant took advantage of the complainants vulnerability?
S138 CA 1961- sexual exploitation of a person with significant impairment
Section 128 (1)(a)
Sexual Violation by rape
A PERSON
RAPES
ANOTHER PERSON
A PERSON
DEF: accepted by judicial notice or circumstantial evidence. (in this case someone who has a penis)
RAPES:
DEF: Person A penetrates person B genitalia with person A’s penis.
Penetration:
DEF: introduction to the slightest degree is enough to effect a connection.
Proof of penetration may be established by complainants evidence, medical exam, defendants admissions.
CL: RV KOROHEKE
The genitalia comprises of the reproductive organs, interior and exterior… they include the vulva, labia- interior and exterior at the opening of the vagina.
DEF: consent:
Consent is a persons conscious and voluntary agreement to something desired or proposed by another
CL: R V COX
consent must be full, free, informed, voluntary, freely given by a person who is in the position to form a rational judgement.
CL: R V GUTAMA
Under the objective test, the crown must prove that no reasonable person in the accused shoes could have thought that the complainant was consenting.
ANOTHER PERSON:
DEF: as proven by judicial notice or circumstantial evidential. In this case someone who has a vagina/vulva.
section 128 (1)(b)
Sexual violation by unlawful sexual connection
A PERSON
HAS UNLAWFUL SEXUAL CONNECTION
WITH ANOTHER PERSON
A PERSON
DEF: as proven by judicial notice or circumstantial evidence in this case the charge is gender agnostic.
HAS UNLAWFUL SEXUAL CONNECTION
DEF: connection effected by the introduction into the genitalia or anus of one person, for other than genuine medical purposes;
a part of the body of another person
an object held or manipulated by another person
connection between the mouth or tongue of one person and a part of another persons genitalia or anus
the continuation of connection as described above.
Penetration:
DEF: introduction to the slightest degree is enough to effect a connection.
Proof of penetration may be established by complainants evidence, medical exam, defendants admissions.
CL: RV KOROHEKE
The genitalia compresses of the reproductive organs, interior and exterior… they include the vulva, labia- interior and exterior at the opening of the vagina.
DEF: consent:
Consent is a persons conscious and voluntary agreement to something desired or proposed by another
CL: R V COX
consent must be full, free, informed, voluntary, freely given by a person who is in the position to form a rational judgement.
CL: R V GUTAMA
Under the objective test, the crown must prove that no reasonable person in the accused shoes could have thought that the complainant was consenting.
WITH ANOTHER PERSON
DEF: as proven by judicial notice or circumstantial material- in this case the charge is gender agnostic.
S129 (1)
Attempted unlawful sexual connection.
A PERSON
ATTEMPTS
UNLAWFUL SEXUAL CONNECTION
WITH ANOTHER PERSON
S129 (2)
Assault with intent to commit sexual violation
A PERSON
ASSAULTS
ANOTHER PERSON
WITH INTENT
TO HAVE UNLAWFUL SEXUAL CONNECTION
WITH THAT PERSON
A PERSON
proven by judicial notice or circumstantial evidence
In this care it is gender agnostic.
ASSAULTS
DEF:
Intentionally applying or attempting to apply force to a person, directly or indirectly.
ANOTHER PERSON
As proven by judicial notice or circumstantial evidence
WITH INTENT
DEF: deliberate act, specific outcome.
CL: R V COLLISTER- intent inferred by circumstance.
TO HAVE UNLAWFUL SEXUAL CONNECTION
DEF: Penetration or the genitalia or anus for any reason other than genuine medical purposes.
Any body part of another person or any object held or manipulated by another.
Connection of the mouth or tongue to another persons genitalia or anus
The continuation of connection as described above.
PENETRATION
DEF: Introduction into the genitalia, no matter how slight or fleeting.
CL: R V KOROHEKE
The genitalia is the external reproductive organs, including the vulva, labia, interior and exterior and the opening of the vagina.
CL: R V GUTUAMA
Under the objective test, the crown must prove that no person in the defendants shoes could have believed that the complainant was consenting.
CONSENT:
DEF: Conscious and voluntary agreement to something desired or proposed by another.
CL: R V COX
Conscious, free, informed, Voluntary, freely given by someone who can make a rational judgement.
WITH ANOTHER PERSON
As proven by judicial notice or circumstantial evidence. In this case gender agnostic.
to be guilty of attempting to commit an offence, a person must:
INTEND- to commit the offence.
take REAL and SUBSTNATIAL STEPS towards achieving that aim
Intent
deliberate act, specific outcome
R V COLLISTER
Intent inferred by circumstance
circumstantial evidence which helps prove intent
the offenders actions and words, before during or after event.
the surrounding circumstances.
the nature of the act its self.
what must be proven for attempted sexual violation
intended to have sexual connection with the complainant.
the complainant did not consent to the intended sexual connection.
the defendant did not believe on reasonable grounds that the complainant was consenting.
to be guilty of an attempts charge the defendant must have…
progressed past the stage of preparation and started the process intended to lead to the commission of the full offence.
R V HARPUR
An attempt includes an act or omission constituting a substantial step in a course of conduct planned to culminate in his commission of the crime
what must the court consider in relation to assessing proximity
the defendants conduct at the relevant time.
evidence of his intent based on circumstances
any steps taken leading up to that point.
R V HARPUR (sufficiently proximity)
the court may have regard to the conduct viewed cumulatively up to the point when the conduct in question stops…
the defendant’s conduct may be considered in its entirety.
Considering how much remains to be done is always relevant, though not determinative.
examples of attempts according to the American model penal code.
enticing a victim to go to the scene of the contemplative crime.
Lying in wait, searching for or following the contemplated victim.
possession, collection or fabrication of materials to be employed in the commission of the offence.
prior scoping/observation of the scene of the contemplated crime.
soliciting an innocent agent to engage in conduct constituting an element of the offence.
unlawful entry of a structure, vehicle or enclosure in which it is contemplated that the offence will be committed.
129(2) crimes act 1961
A PERSON
DEF: as proven by judicial notice or circumstantial material- in this case the charge is gender agnostic.
ASSAULTS
DEF: intentionally applying or attempting to apply force to another person, directly or indirectly, or threatening by act or gesture to do such an act.
ANOTHER PERSON
DEF: as proven by judicial notice or circumstantial material- in this case the charge is gender agnostic.
WITH INTENT
DEF: deliberate act, specific outcome.
CL: R V COLLISTER- intent inferred by circumstance.
Must prove at the time the defendant assaulted the complainant they:
intended to have sexual connection with the complainant.
the complaint did not consent to sexual connection.
the defendant did not believe on reasonable grounds there was consent.
TO COMMIT SEXUAL VIOLATION
DEF: connection effected by the introduction into the genitalia or anus of one person, for other than genuine medical purposes;
a part of the body of another person
an object held or manipulated by another person
connection between the mouth or tongue of one person and a part of another persons genitalia or anus
the continuation of connection as described above.
Penetration:
DEF: introduction to the slightest degree is enough to effect a connection.
Proof of penetration may be established by complainants evidence, medical exam, defendants admissions.
CL: RV KOROHEKE
The genitalia compresses of the reproductive organs, interior and exterior… they include the vulva, labia- interior and exterior at the opening of the vagina.
DEF: consent:
Consent is a persons conscious and voluntary agreement to something desired or proposed by another
CL: R V COX
consent must be full, free, informed, voluntary, freely given by a person who is in the position to form a rational judgement.
CL: R V GUTAMA
Under the objective test, the crown must prove that no reasonable person in the accused shoes could have thought that the complainant was consenting.
OF ANOTHER PERSON
DEF: as proven by judicial notice or circumstantial material- in this case the charge is gender agnostic
what are the two things the crown must prove that consent was not present
The victim did not consent
or the victims consent was not valid.
or the defendant did not beleive on reasonable grounds that the victim was consenting.
the two elements which need to be proven in the charge of assault with intent to commit a sexual violation.
-the defendant assaulted the vicitm.
the defendant intnended to commit sexual violation
is consent a defence under section 132 CA 1961?
no- it is not a defence for sexual conduct with a child under 12.
S132(1)CA 1961
sexual connection with a child under 12 yrs.
A PERSON
DEF: as proven by judicial notice or circumstantial material- in this case the charge is gender agnostic.
HAS SEXUAL CONNECTION
DEF: connection effected by the introduction into the genitalia or anus of one person, for other than genuine medical purposes;
a part of the body of another person
an object held or manipulated by another person
connection between the mouth or tongue of one person and a part of another persons genitalia or anus
the continuation of connection as described above.
Penetration:
DEF: introduction to the slightest degree is enough to effect a connection.
Proof of penetration may be established by complainants evidence, medical exam, defendants admissions.
CL: RV KOROHEKE
The genitalia compresses of the reproductive organs, interior and exterior… they include the vulva, labia- interior and exterior at the opening of the vagina.
DEF: consent:
Consent is a persons conscious and voluntary agreement to something desired or proposed by another
CL: R V COX
consent must be full, free, informed, voluntary, freely given by a person who is in the position to form a rational judgement.
CL: R V GUTAMA
Under the objective test, the crown must prove that no reasonable person in the accused shoes could have thought that the complainant was consenting.
WITH A CHILD
Child means a person under the age of 12 yrs.
This offence is gender neutral.
CL: R V FORREST AND FORREST
The best evidence possible in the circumstances should be adduced by the prosecution in proof of the victims age.
Consent is not a defence.
what is the penalty for sexual conduct with a child under 12
14 yrs.
what is the penalty for rape/unlawful sexual connection
20 yrs.
what is the penalty for attempted sexual violation and assaults with intent to commit sexual violation
10 yrs.
COX V R (childrens consent)
although we do not exclude the possibility that a child of 10 or 11 may be able to give fully, voluntary, free and informed consent to sexual intercourse, the circumstances that would justify that conclusion would be exceptional if not rare
COX R V (no reasonable adult)
save in exceptional circumstances even where she indicates an agreement to the act occurring, no reasonable adult would have grounds for believing that a ten or eleven year old girl has the experience or maturity to understand the nature and significance of the act.
R V FORREST AND FORREST
The best evidence possible in the circumstances should be adduced by the prosecution in proof of the victims age
134 (1) CA 1961
A PERSON
DEF: as proven by judicial notice or circumstantial material- in this case the charge is gender agnostic.
HAS SEXUAL CONNECTION
DEF: connection effected by the introduction into the genitalia or anus of one person, for other than genuine medical purposes;
a part of the body of another person
an object held or manipulated by another person
connection between the mouth or tongue of one person and a part of another persons genitalia or anus
the continuation of connection as described above.
Penetration:
DEF: introduction to the slightest degree is enough to effect a connection.
Proof of penetration may be established by complainants evidence, medical exam, defendants admissions.
CL: RV KOROHEKE
The genitalia compresses of the reproductive organs, interior and exterior… they include the vulva, labia- interior and exterior at the opening of the vagina.
DEF: consent:
Consent is a persons conscious and voluntary agreement to something desired or proposed by another
CL: R V COX
consent must be full, free, informed, voluntary, freely given by a person who is in the position to form a rational judgement.
CL: R V GUTAMA
Under the objective test, the crown must prove that no reasonable person in the accused shoes could have thought that the complainant was consenting.
WITH A YOUNG PERSON
DEF: A person who between the ages 12 and 16 yrs.
CL: R V FORREST AND FORREST
The best evidence possible in the circumstances should be adduced by the prosecution in proof of the victims age.
Age is defence if:
before the time of the act he or she had taken reasonable steps to find out whether the young person was of or over 16 yrs.
at the time of the offence he or she belived on reasonable grounds that the young person was of or over 16 yrs.
The young person consented.