SEX OFFENCES Flashcards
What is the Crimes Act definition of sexual violation?
128 (1) Sexual violation is the act of a person who:
(a) rapes another person; or
(b) has UL sexual connection with another person.
Define ‘sexual connection’.
Section 2, Crimes Act 1961
Sexual connection means:
(a) Connection effected by the introduction into the genitalia or anus of one person, otherwise than for genuine medical purposes, of, of:
(i) a part of the body of another person; or
(ii) an object held or manipulated by another person; or
(b) connection between the mouth or tongue of one person and a part of another person’s genitalia or anus; or
(c) the continuation of connection of a kind described in paragraph (a) or (b).
Does the extent / degree of penetration matter when proving a sexual connection?
Section 2(1A), Crimes Act 1961 (interpretation)
Introduction to the slightest degree is enough to effect a connection.
Penetration of the genitalia or anus must be proved, but the extent of penetration is not relevant; any degree of penetration is sufficient, no matter how slight or fleeting it is.
Give 3 ways of proving penetration.
Proof of penetration may be proved by:
- Complainant’s evidence.
- Medical examination (injuries, DNA evidence) .
- Defendant admissions.
Define genitalia.
Genitalia / genitals include the penis and testicles of a male and the vulva and vagina of a female.
The wider statutory definition includes surgically constructed genitalia.
Section 2, Crimes Act 1961
R v Koroheke
R v Koroheke
Defines genitalia.
The genitalia comprise the reproductive organs, interior and exterior …. they include the vulva (and) the labia, both interior and exterior, at the opening of the vagina.
(Helper - Koroheke’s box).
What is continuation in the context of sexual violations.
The definition of sexual connection includes the continuation of sexual acts - where sexual activity is started consensually, but consent is later withdrawn and the act still continues. If a person continues intercourse knowing consent has been withdrawn, the consensual act may have become unlawful.
Can a person be presumed incapable of sexual connection because of their age?
Section 127, Crimes Act 1961
There is no presumption of law that a person is incapable of sexual connection because of his or her age.
This provision means that anyone is capable, in a legal sense, of being involved in a sexual connection.
Therefore, it would NOT be a defence to a sex related charge to say that either of the parties was too young or too old to have sexual connection.
Establishing / proving sexual connection was unlawful involves what sort of test?
A subjective/objective consent in relation to consent.
- (Subjective) The complainant did not consent to the sexual activity
- (Subjective) The defendant did not believe the complainant was consenting
- (Objective) If the defendant did believe the complainant was consenting, this belief was not reasonable.
The Crown must prove these things.
Define consent.
A person’s conscious and voluntary agreement to do something desired or proposed by another person
R v Cox
Consent must be “full, voluntary, free and informed …freely and voluntarily given by a person in a position to form rational judgement”.
(Helper - I consent to a lot of Cox)
R v Gutuama
Under the objective test the Crown must prove that “no reasonable person in the accused’s shoes could have thought that (the complainant) was consenting”.
(Helper - Gut-no consent to r-ama)
(Helper - The unreasonable Gutuamalan)
What section of the act outlines situations where apparent consent is not valid?
128A
Allowing sexual activity does not amount to consent in some circumstances .
Case law - R v Koroheke - extorcion/submission is not consent
Give examples of ‘invalid consent’
A person does not consent to sexual activity when
- just because they don’t protest or resist
- asleep/unconscious
- forced, threatened, or frightened into the act
- too affected by drugs/alcohol
- mentally impaired
- mistaken ID
- mistaken about nature and quality of the act
What case law relates to invalid consent?
R v Koroheke
It is important to distinguish between consent that is freely given and submission by a woman to what she may regard as unwanted but unavoidable. Submission …. is not true consent.
Define rape.
Section 128(2), Crimes Act 1961
Person A rapes person B if person A has sexual connection with person B, effected by the penetration of person B’s genitalia by person A’s penis, -
(a) without person B’s consent to the connection; and
(b) without believing on reasonable grounds that person B consents to the connection.
Rape is a form of UL sexual connection that involves the non-consensual penetration of the complainant’s genitals by the offender’s penis.
Define sexual violation by unlawful sexual connection.
Section 128(3), Crimes Act 1961
(3) Person A has UL sexual connection with person B, if person A has sexual connection with person B
(a) without person B’s consent to the connection; and
(b) without believing on reasonable grounds that person B consents to the connection.
Give the act and section for sexual violation by rape.
Section 128(1)(a), Crimes Act 1961
Give the act and section for sexual violation by unlawful sexual connection.
Section 128(1)(b), Crimes Act 1961
Give the act and section for attempted sexual violation
Section 129, Crimes Act 1961
Give the act and section for sexual connection with a child under 12
Section 132, Crimes Act 1961
Give the act and section for sexual connection with a young person under 16
Section 134, Crimes Act 1961
Give the act and section for indecent act
Section 135, Crimes Act 1961
Give the act, section and elements for sexual violation by rape.
Section 128(1)(a), Crimes Act 1961
- A person
- Rapes
- Another person
Cox (consent)
Koroheke (genitalia)
Section 2 - (genitalia, penis)
Section 2 - (penetration - slightest degree enough to effect penetration, penetration must be proved)
Gutuama (reasonable person would not believe there was consent)
Give the act, section and elements for sexual violation by unlawful sexual connection
Section 128(1)(b), Crimes Act 1961
- A person
- Has unlawful sexual connection with
- Another person
Give the act, section and elements for attempted sexual violation
Section 129(2), Crimes Act 1961
- A person
- Assaults
- Another person
- With intent to commit sexual violation of the other person
Person - generally accepted by judicial notice or proved by circumstantial evidence.
Section 2 CA1961- assault
Give the act, section and elements for sexual connection with a child under 12
Section 132, Crimes Act 1961
- A person
(a) Has sexual connection with a child
(b) Attempts to have sexual connection with a child
(c) Does an indecent act on a child
Give the act, section and elements for sexual connection with a child under 14.
Section 134, Crimes Act 1961
- A person
(a) Has sexual connection with a young person
(b) Attempts to have sexual connection with a young person
(c) Does an indecent act on a young person.