DECEPTION Flashcards

1
Q

Section 228(1)(a), Crimes Act 1961

A

DISHONESTLY TAKING OR USING A DOCUMENT

• Dishonestly
• Without claim of right
• Takes or obtains
• Any document
• With intent to obtain any
o property
o service
o pecuniary advantage
o valuable consideration

(TAKES)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Section 228(1)(b), Crimes Act 1961

A

DISHONESTLY TAKING OR USING A DOCUMENT

• Dishonestly
• Without claim of right
• Uses or attempts to use
• Any document
• With intent to obtain any
o property
o service
o pecuniary advantage
o valuable consideration

(USES OR ATTEMPTS TO USE)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Section 240(1)(a), Crimes Act 1961

A

OBTAINING BY DECEPTION OR CAUSING LOSS BY DECEPTION

• By any deception
• Without claim of right
• Obtains ownership or possession of, or control over
o any property,
o any privilege,
o service,
o pecuniary advantage
o benefit
o valuable consideration,
• Directly or indirectly
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Section 240(1)(b), Crimes Act 1961

A

OBTAINING BY DECEPTION OR CAUSING LOSS BY DECEPTION

  • By any deception
  • Without claim of right
  • In incurring any debt or liability,
  • Obtains credit
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Section 240(1)(c), Crimes Act 1961

A

OBTAINING BY DECEPTION OR CAUSING LOSS BY DECEPTION

• By any deception
• Without claim of right
• Induces or causes any other person to
o deliver over
o execute
o make
o accept
o endorse
o destroy, or
o alter
• Any document or thing capable of being used to derive a pecuniary advantage
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Section 240(1)(d), Crimes Act 1961

A

OBTAINING BY DECEPTION OR CAUSING LOSS BY DECEPTION

  • By any deception
  • Without claim of right
  • Causes loss to any other person
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Name the key case laws you must remember

A

R v Misic - document
R v Morley - intention to deceive requires deception be practised
R v Cox - possession
R v Laverty - Crown must prove inducement made by false representation
Hayes v R - definition of pecuniary advantage, valuable consideration, unsuccessful use is still use
Fisher v Raven - credit
R v Cara - service
R v Tipple - defines recklessness
R v Cameron - 2 fold test to prove recklessness
R v McKay - credit must be obtained AND must be intent to deceive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Define obtain

A

Section 217, CA 1961

Obtain, in relation to any person, means obtain or retain for himself or herself or for any other person.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Define property

A

Section 2, CA 1961

Property includes real and personal property and any estate or interest in any real or personal property, money, electricity and any debt, and any thing in action, and any other right or interest.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Define pecuniary advantage

A

Hayes v R

A pecuniary advantage is anything that enhances the accused’s financial position. It is that enhancement which constitutes the element of advantage.

  • cash from stolen goods
  • clothing or cash from a stolen eftpos card
  • discount
  • avoiding payment on a debt
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Define valuable consideration

A

Hayes v R

A valuable consideration is anything capable of being valuable consideration, whether of a monetary kind or of any other kind; in short, money or money’s worth.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Define dishonesty

A

Section 217, CA 1961

In relation to an act or omission, means done or omitted without a belief that there was express or implied consent to, or authority for, the act or omission from a person entitled to give such consent or authority.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Define claim of right

A

Section 2, CA 1961

In relation to any act, means a belief at the time of the act in a proprietary or possessory right in property in relation to which the offence is alleged to have been committed, although that belief may be based on ignorance or mistake of fact or of any matter of law other than the enactment against which the offence is alleged to have been committed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Define takes

A

taking is not specifically defined by stature but can be read in conjunction with the definition of theft offered in Section 219(4), CA 1961

For tangible property, theft is committed by a taking when the offender moves the property or causes it to be moved.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Define document

A

Section 217, CA 1961

Includes part of a document in any form, and includes:

  • paper/material containing anything that can be read
  • photos, negatives and related items
  • discs, tapes, cards or other devices/equipment on which information is stored and can be reproduced

R v Misic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Explain the case law that you would apply in a discussion of the element of ‘uses or attempts to use any document’ in Section 228(b).

what must the prosecution prove?

A

Hayes v R

An unsuccessful use of a document is as much use as a successful one….Because the use does not have to be successful it may be difficult to draw a clear line between use and attempted use.

Prosecution must prove that the offender used or attempted to use the document with intent to obtain the property

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Define deception

A

Section 240(2), CA 1961

(a) a false representation, whether oral, documentary, or by conduct, where the person making the representation intends to deceive any other person and -
(i) knows that it is false in a material particular; or
(ii) is reckless as to whether it is false in a material particular;

(b) an omission to disclose a material particular, with intent to deceive any person, in circumstances where there is a duty to disclose it; or
(c) a fraudulent device, trick, or stratagem used with intent to deceive any person.

(to deceive you must

  • make a false rep, omit, use a fraud
  • intend to deceive
  • know the rep is false or be reckless about it
  • can be evidenced in words, conduct or documents)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

R v Misic

A

Essentially a document is a thing which provides evidence or information or serves as a record.

(document definition)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

R v Morley

A

An intention to deceive requires that the deception be practiced in order to deceive the affected party. Purposeful intent is necessary and must exist at the time of the deception.

(intention to deceive requires deception be practiced)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

R v Laverty

A

It is necessary for the prosecution to prove that the person parting with the property was induced to do so by the false representation made.

(Crown must prove inducement was a result of believing a false representation)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

R v Cox (possession)

A

Possession involves two elements. The first, often called the physical element, is actual or potential physical custody or control. The second, often described as the mental element, is a combination of knowledge and intention: knowledge in the sense of an awareness by the accused that the substance is in his possession and an intention to exercise possession,

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Define debt

A

Money owing from one person to another.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Define liability

A

Legally enforceable financial obligation to pay.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Fisher v Raven

A

Credit refers to the obligation on the debtor to pay or repay, and the time given for them to do so by the creditor. Credit does not extend to an obligation to supply services or goods.

(Credit)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

R v Cara

A

Service is limited to financial or economical value and excludes privileges or benefits.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

In regards to the definition of dishonesty, the defendant can raise reasonable doubt on the basis of a mistaken belief. What are the two kinds of mistaken belief?

A
  • That the act or omission was, expressly or implicitly, consented to by a person entitled to give consent

OR

  • that the act or omission was authorised by a person entitled to authorise it.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

Discuss the legislation for attempts

A

Section 72(1), CA 1961

Everyone who, having an intent to commit an offence, does or omits an act for the purpose of accomplishing his object, is guilty of an attempt to commit the offence intended, whether in the circumstances it was possible to commit the offence or not.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

In regards to the concept of claim of right, what is important to remember in relation to timing?

A

The belief must be held at the time of the conduct alleged to constitute the offence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

What is required to prove a deception? (x4)

A
  • That there was an intent to deceive
  • That there was a representation by the defendant
  • That the representation was false OR the defendant either knew it to be false in a material particular OR was reckless whether it was false in a material particular
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

Explain the concept of ‘continuing effect’ in relation to a representation and provide an example.

A

In many cases a representation by words or conduct may have a continuing effect.

Entering a restaurant and ordering a meal represents that the diner will follow the normal practice and pay for the meal.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

As a general rule, silence or non-disclosure will NOT be regarded as a representation.

Explain one exception to this rule, with an example.

A

As a general rule, silence or non-disclosure will NOT be regarded as a representation BUT the exception is where an incorrect understanding is implied from a course of dealing, and the defendant has then failed to negate that incorrect understanding.

Example - Police v Dronjak
The defendant was shopping in department store. He was told by a shop assistant that a car radio was $695.83. When the defendant got to checkout the item had two price tags, one for $695.83 and the other for $38.88 (no evidence of tampering). The defendant allowed the cashier to charge incorrect price of $38.88.

32
Q

In regards to a deception, the prosecution must prove that the defendant knew that the representation was false in a material particular, or that the defendant was reckless as to its falsity. How can this knowledge be established? (3 ways)

A
  • propensity evidence
  • an admission
  • implication from the circumstances surrounding the event

PAC - propensity evidence, admissions, circumstances

33
Q

How is recklessness defined in R v Tipple?

A

Recklessness means the conscious and deliberate taking of an unjustified risk.

34
Q

Explain the subjective/objective test in regards to recklessness and name the case law that applied

A

It must be proved that the defendant

  • was aware of the risk of his actions and proceeded regardless (subjective)
  • that it was unreasonable for him to do so (objective)

R v Cameron

35
Q

If property obtained through dishonest means is found on premises that the defendant has control of, is that sufficient to prove control?

A

No. It must be proved that they defendant exercised some control over it. (Adams on Criminal Law, 2001)

36
Q

What does R v McKay lay out in regards to the timing of the intention to deceive.

A

R v McKay

Credit had been obtained but at that time the accused did not possess an intent to deceive.

37
Q

What needs to be proved, and does not need to be proved under Section 240(1)(d)? (obtaining by deception - cause loss)

A

The prosecution must prove

  • that the loss was caused by a deception
  • that it was reasonably foreseeable that a loss that was more than trivial would occur

However Prosecution need not prove that the loss was intentionally caused, or that there was a benefit to any person

38
Q

Outline the penalties for deception offences.

A

The penalty will be dictated by the loss caused, or the value of what is obtained

  • where the value of the property is $1000+ = max 7 years
  • $500-$1000 = max 1 year
  • less than $500 = max 3 months
39
Q

What is the meaning of the term ‘propensity evidence’ as it is used in Section 40, 41 and 43, Evidence Act 2006?

A

This is defined in Section 40(1)(a) and (b).

(a) means evidence that tends to show a person’s propensity to act in a particular way or to have a particular state of mind, being evidence of acts, omissions, events or circumstances with which a person is alleged to have been involved; but
(b) does not include evidence of an act or omission that is -

(i) one of the elements of the offence for which the person is being tried; or
(ii) the cause of action in the proceeding in question.

40
Q

What does Section 43(1) say about ‘probative value’?

A

The prosecution may offer propensity evidence about a defendant in a criminal proceeding only if the evidence has a probative value in relation to an issue in dispute in the proceeding which outweighs the risk that the evidence may have an unfairly prejudicial effect on the defendant.

R v Sharma applies.

41
Q

When assessing the prejudicial effect of evidence on the defendant, what must the Judge must consider?

A

(a) whether the evidence is likely to unfairly predispose the fact-finder against the defendant; and
(b) whether the fact-finder will tend to give disproportionate weight in reaching a verdict to evidence of other acts or omissions.

R v Sharma
‘the ultimate issue is the degree to which the probative value of the evidence outweighs its prejudicial effects’

42
Q

What is the term given to a title obtained by deception, fraud, duress or misrepresentation?

A

Voidable title

43
Q

What is necessary to avoid title?

A
  • Communication with the deceiver to advise them that you are aware of the deception. Can be by letter or in person. If they cannot be contacted a public notice in the newspaper is sufficient.

OR

  • Making a complaint to police that the property was obtained by deception.
44
Q

Give 4 examples of pecuniary advantage

A
  • cash from stolen goods
  • clothing or cash obtained by credit or EFTPOS card
  • a discount (by using a student ID card)
  • avoiding or deferring payment of a debt

Use Hayes v R as your case law!

45
Q

Give 3 examples of valuable consideration

A
  • monetary payment in return for goods or services.
  • goods given in return for services provided.
  • issuing a false invoice to receive payment for goods never supplied

Use Hayes v R as your case law!

46
Q

Dishonestly

A

Dishonestly, in relation to an act or omission, means done or omitted without a belief that there was express or implied consent to, or authority for, the act or omission from a person entitled to give such consent or authority

47
Q

Define document

A

A document includes any item that provides evidence of information or serves as a record (such as a computer disc).

R v Misic

48
Q

Define credit

A

Credit refers to the obligation on the debtor to pay or repay, and the time given for them to do so by the creditor. Credit does not extend to an obligation to supply services or goods.

It is intangible - it must be obtained in respect to a monetary obligation ie a meal at a restaurant

Fisher v Raven

49
Q

In criminal law context there are 2 types of intent. what are they

A

there must be an intention to commit the act and also an intention to produce a specific outcome

50
Q

Define material particular

A

an important, essential or relevant detail

51
Q

Define privilege and benefit, and give examples

A

Both words mean a special right or advantage, and are not limited to the pecuniary (monetary)

  • using another person’s gym membership (in this case, i there does not need to be financial loss tot he person defrauded)
52
Q

What is the distinction between theft and deception

A

A thief obtains possession of the property stolen but never legal ownership/title because the owner hasn’t provided consent / parted with the property willingly and knowingly

53
Q

To convict a defendant of 240(1)(b), what must you prove

A

their identity, and that they:

  • by deception, and without COR
  • in incurring any debt of liability
  • gained credit

there must be a causal link between the debt/liability and the gaining of credit. the obligation to pay must be legally enforceable. the intent to deceive and gain credit must exist at the time the deception is perpetrated ie if you walk away without paying for a meal, you must have decided that when you walked into he restaurant or had just started eating

54
Q

evidence of inducement would be provided by who?

A

the person who was defrauded

the person who has been deceived should be questioned to prove that they believed what transpired to be a false representation, and that as a consequence of that belief, they parted with their money

R v Laverty

55
Q

Propensity evidence is admissible in cases of deception where there is a sufficiently strong link between the offences

what is the ultimate issue when regarding if the evidence should be admissible

A

R v Sharma

The ultimate issue is the degree to which the probative value of the evidence outweighs its prejudicial effect

56
Q

What sort of things would amount to Theft by a Person in a Special Relationship (220)

A
  • receiving property and failing to account for it, to any other person
  • receiving the proceeds of property and failing to account for it, to any other person
  • receiving property and dealing with it in a way that is not in accordance with the requirements of the person you received it from
57
Q

What is the penalty for Theft by a Person in a Special Relationship

what is the mens rea?

A

7 years, regardless of the property value

It must be proven that the defendant

  • received property on conditions - ie to deal with the property as per the requirements of the person it was given by
  • intentionally departed from this obligation
58
Q

What is the penalty for Forgery

When is forgery complete

A

10 years

Complete as soon as the document is made with knowledge that it is false and intent that the document is to be seen as genuine, even if the document is incomplete and or the defendant does not use it

For something to have been forged it must be a document, and it must be false

59
Q

A False document is defined in Section 255 of the CA 1961.

Give examples of a false document

A

A document that claims to be made by or on behalf of another person of a fictitious person, or a document that has been altered or reproduced

  • writing an exam paper in another’s name
  • forging letters of recommendation for a CV
60
Q

What must the Prosecution prove with Forgery?

A

It must be proven that

  • the defendant knew the document was false
  • intended to use the document to obtain something
  • intended that the document be acted or used upon as a genuine document

there is NO requirement to prove that

  • the defendant had an intention to deceive
  • that the document was put to its intended use
61
Q

What is the difference between the offence of forgery and the offence of altering and reproducing a document

A

For forgery, there must be a false document, and only the intention to deceive is required, NOT an intention to obtain something through deception

The difference is in the intent and in the documentations

62
Q

What is an alteration (in the context of a document)

A

additions, insertions, deletions, obliterations, erasures, removal of material

an alteration is a material alteration if it increases the value or negotiability of a document or instrument

63
Q

What is required to prove false representation

A

You must prove

  • that there was intent to deceive
  • that there was a representation by the defendant
  • the representation was false OR defendant knew, or was reckless as to whether the representation was false

IRF-KR (intent, representation, falsity, knowledge/recklessness)

64
Q

Define the term access (in the context of computer crime)

A

To instruct, communicate with, store data in, receive data from or otherwise make use of any of the resources in a computer system

65
Q

What intent must be proved to convict someone of accessing a computer system for a dishonest purpose

A

It must be proved that the defendant

  • obtained property etc
  • caused loss to any other person
66
Q

When arresting on behalf of the Serious Fraud Office, explain the roles of each organisation.

A

SFO do not have power of arrest. Police arrest.

SFO prepares file and is responsible for prosecution. Police must never represent the SFO in Court.

67
Q

Define computer system

A

Computer system
(a) means

(i) a computer; or
(ii) two or more interconnected computers; or
(iii) any communication links between computers or to remote terminals or another device; or
(iv) two or more interconnected computers combined with any communication links between computers or to remote terminals or any other device; and
(b) includes any part of the items described in paragraph (a) and all related input, output, processing, storage, software, or communication facilities, and stored data.

68
Q

What is the criteria for a fraud to be handed over to the Serious Fraud Office?

A
  • Actual or potential loss in excess of $2,000,000
  • Where the facts, law or evidence is of great complexity
  • Of great interest or concern (eg. involving a public figure)
69
Q

Before beginning an investigation into credit card and cheque offences, which external agency should you consult first?

A

The bank’s fraud investigators.

70
Q

List the elements of Accessing computer systems for dishonest purposes, s249(2). CA 1961.

A

Directly or indirectly accesses any computer system with intent, dishonestly or by deception, and without claim of right; -
(a) to obtain any property, privilege, service, pecuniary advantage, benefit or valuable consideration; or

(b) to cause loss to any other person.

71
Q

List the elements of Using forged document, s257(1), CA 1961.

A

Knowing a document to be forged, -
(a) uses the document to obtain any property, privilege, service, pecuniary advantage, benefit, or valuable consideration; or

(b) uses, deals with, or acts upon the document as if it were genuine; or
(c) causes any other person to use, deal with, or act upon it as if it were genuine.

72
Q

List the elements of Altering, concealing, destroying, or reproducing document with intent to deceive, s258(1), CA 1961.

A

With intent to obtain by deception any property, privilege, service, pecuniary advantage, benefit, or valuable consideration, or to cause loss to any other person, -
(a) alters, conceals, or destroys any document, or causes any document to be altered, concealed or destroyed; or

(b) makes a document or causes a document to be made that is, in whole or in part, a reproduction of any other document.

73
Q

Define representation

A

No statutory or case law definition.

Examples could be a statement of a present fact, an opinion, belief, indication, intention, knowledge

It must contain a proposition of fact, to be capable therefore of being false

74
Q

When is the offence of obtaining complete?

A

When you have

  • Sought to obtain something
  • With the intention to deceive

You do not have to physically obtain the thing to be guilty of obtaining

75
Q

What does Hayes v R say about dishonesty and belief

A

The question is whether the belief was held, not whether that belief was a reasonable one