Sex Differences and Sexual Selection Flashcards
What is evolution?
The process whereby useful features are introduced into a species.
Features are useful if they help the animal survive long enough to successfully reproduce.
To survive and reproduce, animals need to be well adapted to their environment.
What were the main 3 concepts formed by Charles Darwin?
Natural selection.
Genes.
Mutations.
Darwin’s (1871) concept of sexual selection concerns what?
Concerns the selection of those characteristics that aid successful reproduction (rather than survival).
Give and example of genetic fitness with nature?
Some physical characteristics, such as a male peacock’s tail, are a sign of genetic fitness.
What is genetic fitness?
An organism’s ability to pass its genetic material to its offspring.
Species that are more “fit” can pass on their genes and ensure their survival.
What is more likely to happen, if a female selects a male with genetically fit characteristics?
More likely to produce robust offspring and therefore the preference for the desire characteristic is perpetuated in future generations.
Give an example of a behaviour that is evolutionary adaptive. Why?
Aggressiveness.
This is because they provide an advantage for a male over competitors for reproductive rights.
Why is aggressiveness a desirable evolutionary characteristic?
It had allowed the animal to reproduce in the first place.
This characteristic is then passed on to offspring, if they it is genetically determined.
This means that the genes that gave rise to the characteristics remain in the population.
When did Darwin form is concept of sexual selection?
1871.
What did Thiessen et al do in 1993?
Looked at personal ads.
Stated that they act as a sort of mate arena, where males and females offer certain characteristics in an attempt to attract a mate, whilst at the same time requesting qualities they would like in return.
What did Thiessen et al find? (1993)
Men typically offer resources and seek attractiveness.
Women seek the resources and offer attractiveness.
What does Buss’ research from 1989 provide?
Provides supporting evidence for universal sex differences in long-term mate preferences.
What did Buss explore in his 1989 study?
Explored what males and females looked for in a marriage partner.
How many people took part in Buss’ 1989 study? How many cultures?
The study involved over 10,000 people from 37 different cultures.
What was the procedure of Buss’ 1989 study?
Asked to rate 18 characteristics (e.g. physical attractiveness) on how important they would be in choosing a mate.
It was a 3 point scale, 3 = indispensable, 0=irrelevant.
What were the male results of Buss’ 1989 study?
Men placed more importance on physical attractiveness. Research has consistently shown that physical appearance provides a wealth of cues to a woman’s health and hence her fertility and reproductive value.
Men universally wanted mates who were younger than them - an indication that men valued increased fertility in potential mates.
What were the female results of Buss’ 1989 study?
Women more than men desired mates who were ‘good financial prospects’. This translated into a desire for men with resources, or qualities that were linked to resource acquisition, such as ambition.
What were the both gender results of Buss’ 1989 study?
Both sexes wanted mates who were intelligent (linked to skill at parenting), kind (linked to an interest in long-term relationships) and dependable (linked to willingness to help a mate in times of trouble).
Outline the research completed by Buss, 1989. (Signpost).
Buss provides supporting evidence for universal sex differences in long-term mate preferences. They studied over 10,000 people from 37 cultures, exploring what males and females looked for in a marriage partner. They found that more women desired mates who were ‘good financial prospects’, and found that more men relied on physical attractiveness as an important characteristic. This supports the idea that sex preference is different between the genders.
How is the research completed by Buss (1989) nomothetic?
(Evaluation)
Nomothetic, as it used a large sample (10,000 people), in order to produce a generalised conclusion about long-term mate preferences.
This was done with a close-ended questionnaire, due to the large sample size. Close-ended questionnaires allow for quick analysis of quantitative data.
How is the research completed by Buss (1989) culturally inclusive?
(Evaluation)
Cultural inclusive, as it considered 37 different cultures, so there was less bias or incorrectly imposed results.
How is the research completed by Buss (1989) biologically deterministic?
(Evaluation)
Biologically deterministic, as it presumes that mating preferences are pre-determined for each gender - ignoring the role of free-will and individual differences.
How does the research completed by Buss (1989) link to Darwin’s concepts of sexual selection?
(Evaluation)
Links to Darwin’s evolutionary views as it states that women desire resources; securing the survival of herself and her offspring. Also states that men desire physical beauty; perhaps indicating her youthfulness - thus fertility for the men to pass on his genetics.
How does the research completed by Buss (1989) question temporal validity?
(Evaluation)
Temporal validity, perhaps only relevant data to the time period.
What did Clarke and Hatfield provide in 1989?
Provided evidence for sex differences in short-term mating preferences.
Outline the study completed by Clarke and Hatfield in 1989.
96 students, 48 male and 48 female.
Men and women experimenters approached total strangers on a college campus, and said: ‘Hi, I’ve been noticing you around campus and I find you very attractive.’
They then asked them one of three questions:
(1) Would you go on a date with me?
(2) Would you go back to my apartment with me?
(3) Would you have sex with me?
What were the male results from the questions asked by Clarke and Hatfield, 1989?
50% agreed to a date.
69% were willing to go back to her apartment.
75% agreed to have sex.
What were the female results from the questions asked by Clarke and Hatfield, 1989?
50% agreed to go on a date with the man.
6% to go back to his apartment.
0% to have sex.
Were Clarke and Hatfield’s findings reliable?
Yes, as they were replicated in subsequent studies.
What does Clarke and Hatfield’s study demonstrate? What does this include?
Demonstrates that men have evolved psychological mechanisms to ensure success in short-term mating.
These include a desire for:
Sexual variety.
The tendency to let little time elapse before seeking sexual intercourse.
A willingness to consent to sex with strangers.
How is the research completed by Clarke and Hatfield (1989) unrepresentative? Why is this especially significant?
(Evaluation)
The study only used college students, so was unrepresentative of an entire population.
This is especially significant, as it is trying to support the evolutionary approach, so all cultures and lifestyles should be considered
How is the research completed by Clarke and Hatfield (1989) biologically reductionist?
(Evaluation)
Biologically reductionist, as it completely ignores individual differences, using only the operationalised questions are support for short-term mating.
How does the research completed by Clarke and Hatfield (1989) question deception?
(Evaluation)
Elements of deception were used, this brings into question whether a debrief was completed afterwards, in order to protect the participants from psychological harm.
Why is the research completed by Clarke and Hatfield (1989) socially sensitive?
(Evaluation)
It is socially sensitive as it presents men and women in very different light. This means that there are potential consequences or implications, either directly for the participants in the research or for the culture of individuals represented by the research.
Outline the research completed by Miller et al in 2007.
Calculated the tips earned by lap dancers at varying stages of their menstrual cycle.
Those girls who were in the fertile oestrus phase of their cycle earned almost twice the value of tips compared to girls who were not in oestrus.
Is Miller et al’s research from 2007 objective?
(Evaluation)
No, as the findings are correlational, so the results do not necessarily establish cause and effect.
How is the research completed by Miller et al (2007) biologically reductionist?
(Evaluation)
Biologically deterministic, as you cannot control body cycles such as the menstrual cycle.
This presents the research in a negative light, as it renders the incomes of the women pre-determined to biological factors.
Outline Buller’s study from 2005?
Claimed that evolutionary psychologists are mistaken in their claims of a universal female preference for high-status men as mates.
He argues that the majority of studies attempting to determine female mate preference have been carried out on female undergraduate students.
These women expect to achieve high educational status and so have expectations of high income levels.