Setencing Flashcards
Purposes of sentencing
When determining the proportionate sentence to be imposed, the court will have regard to the various purposes of sentencing.
Section 57 SA 2020- In cases involving those aged 18 and over (at the date of conviction) the court must have regard to:
(a)the punishment of offenders,
(b)the reduction of crime (including its reduction by deterrence),
(c)the reform and rehabilitation of offenders,
(d)the protection of the public, and
(e)the making of reparation by offenders to persons affected by their offences.
The purposes are given equal weight though in a particular case some may be more important than others.
Newton Hearings
Where a defendant pleads guilty on a basis that will make a material difference to sentence, the court must hold a Newton hearing to decide the factual basis upon which it should pass sentence (R v Newton).
What happens at a Newton hearing?
In the magistrates’ court, a Newton hearing is presided over by magistrates or a District Judge much like a regular trial. In the Crown Court it takes place without a jury. This is one of the limited number of occasions where a Crown Court Judge acts as the arbiter of both law and fact.
A Newton hearing is an exception to the rule that where a defendant enters a guilty plea there is no ‘trial’ phase to the process.
The prosecution makes an opening speech and calls evidence in the usual way and their witnesses can be cross-examined by the defence. The defendant is able to give evidence and call witnesses if they so wish. Both parties are entitled to address the Judge by way of a closing speech.
At the conclusion of the hearing the court must decide whether the prosecution has proved its version of the facts beyond reasonable doubt. If it has, the defendant will be sentenced on the prosecution version of the facts. If it has failed to prove their factual basis to that standard, the defendant will be sentenced on the defence version of the facts as set out in their basis of plea.
If the prosecution is able to prove their case beyond reasonable doubt and the defendant sentenced on their version of the facts, a further consequence for the defendant is that they lose some of the credit that they receive for pleading guilty. The Reduction in Sentence for a Guilty Plea guideline says that the reduction which would have been available at the stage of proceedings the plea was indicated should normally be halved. Where witnesses are called, it may be appropriate to further decrease the reduction. The rationale must be that the defendant has used up some court time that otherwise would have been saved due to their plea and/or that witnesses who would have been spared from giving evidence due to their plea instead had to come to court and give evidence at the Newton hearing.
Totality
When sentencing for more than one offence, a court must consider what the total sentence should be and arrive at one that is just and proportionate.
This is not as simple as adding the two (or more) sentences together, the Judge will consider whether consecutive or concurrent sentences are more appropriate in the circumstances.
Where the various offences arise out of the same facts it will usually be appropriate to pass concurrent sentences for each, and where they arise out of different facts, consecutive sentences are likely to be passed.
Deferring sentence
A court can defer sentence for up to six months, the idea being that the defendant is allowed this time to prove to the court that D has either ‘changed’ or that the offence was an absolute ‘one-off’ and thus allowing D the ability to present to the court at the end of the deferral period in a much better light, and often, receive a lighter sentence as a result.
The deferral period cannot be extended save for where the magistrates’ court defers sentence for a period, at the end of which they commit to the Crown Court for sentence, the Crown Court then has the option of deferring for a further six month period.
Indications of sentence
There are two formal procedures for seeking an indication of sentence in the
event of a guilty plea. One in each court:
Magistrates’ court
The offence is either-way and the court has accepted jurisdiction during the allocation process.
At this stage, D is entitled ask for an indication of what their sentence would be were they to remain in the magistrates’ court and plead guilty.
The court does not have to give an indication of sentence but, if it does it can only say whether the sentence would be a custodial or a non-custodial sentence.
Only binding if D then pleads guilty.
Crown Court – Goodyear indication
D can ask for an indication of the sentence either before the PTPH or at any stage of the proceedings before the jury return their verdict.
Before asking for an indication D must:
Either accept the prosecution facts or a written basis of plea must be agreed by the parties and the court
Give clear instructions to their counsel that D wishes to ask for an advance indication of sentence.
The giving of an indication is discretionary and it remains the decision of the Judge whether to give one or not.
Seriousness
In order to decide on the appropriate sentence, the court will consider the Sentencing Code 2020 alongside any relevant sentencing guidelines.
The court must determine the seriousness of the offence.
The starting point to determine seriousness is to consider culpability and harm.
Section 63 SA 2020: Where a court is considering the seriousness of any offence, it must consider
(a) the offender’s culpability in committing the offence, and (b) any harm which the offence (i) caused, (ii) was intended to cause, or (iii) might foreseeably have caused.
Seriousness and thresholds
Where appropriate the court must consider whether either statutory threshold has been passed to justify imposing a custodial or community order.
Section 230 SA 2020:
The court must not pass a custodial sentence unless it is of the opinion that—
(a)the offence, or
(b)the combination of the offence and one or more offences associated with it,
was so serious that neither a fine alone nor a community sentence can be justified for the offence’
Section 204 SA 2020:
(2)The court must not make a community order unless it is of the opinion that—
(a)the offence, or
(b)the combination of the offence and one or more offences associated with it, was serious enough to warrant the making of such an order
Culpability and harm
Culpability is essentially blameworthiness and is assessed with reference to the offender’s role, level of intention and/or premeditation and the extent and sophistication of planning.
The mere presence of a factor that is inherent in the offence should not be used in assessing culpability – so for example, intention to cause serious harm is a necessary element in a section 18 OAPA. What would increase culpability might be how the injuries were inflicted e.g. with a weapon.
Harm is an assessment of the damage caused to the victim.
So, in an assault it is a consideration of how injured the victim was and whether the assault was sustained or repeated.
In a theft it will be assessed by the financial loss resulting from the theft and any additional harm suffered by the victim or anyone else, for example injury or emotional distress.
Sentencing Guidelines
Every court MUST follow any sentencing guidelines which are relevant to the offender’s case unless the court is satisfied that it would be contrary to the interests of justice to do so.
Sentencing guidelines are available for most of the significant offences sentenced in the magistrates’ court Sentencing guidelines for use in the magistrates’ courts and for a wide range of offences in the Crown Court Sentencing guidelines for use in Crown Court.
There are also overarching guidelines on general sentencing issues and principles such as Sentencing children and young people.
Where no offence-specific sentencing guideline exists, courts will refer to the General guideline: overarching principles. Judges in the Crown Court might also refer to Court of Appeal judgments to look at how sentences have been reached for similar cases.
The General guideline can also be used with offence-specific guidelines where factors are not covered, and overarching guidance is required.
What happens at a sentencing hearing?
Prosecution open facts, make submissions & applications
Then
Defence Mitigate
Then
Judge passes sentence
Prosecution
The duties of a prosecutor extend to reminding the court of the following:
Any previous convictions
Any ancillary orders that the prosecution seeks (e.g. costs, compensation, restraining order)
Any relevant sentencing guidelines
Any general sentencing issues necessary to ensure that a lawful sentence is passed (e.g. the mandatory minimum sentence provisions)
Any victim impact statement which has been produced.
It is not the role of the prosecution to tell the court or to suggest to the court what the ultimate sentence may be.
Defence
As with the prosecutor, the defence are under a general duty to ensure that a lawful sentence is passed.
Legal representatives must ensure that what they put forward is consistent with their instructions and their duties not to mislead the court.
The defence may ask for a pre-sentence report should they want one. It is, however, more common to ask for one before the prosecution goes through the process of opening the case. If a pre-sentence report is ordered by the court the case will ordinarily be adjourned for a period for this to happen.
Pre sentence reports can be ordered at the Plea and Trial preparation hearing or even at the time of sending.
Pre-sentence reports
Section 30 SA 2020 states that a court must obtain a pre-sentence report before passing a custodial or community sentence, unless it considers it unnecessary to do so.
The report is to assist the court in determining the most suitable method of dealing with an offender. Probation input is needed before a community order can be imposed to assess the defendant’s suitability for any programmes
The probation officer will meet the defendant and discuss the offence and the defendant’s attitude towards it.
Other reports
Sometimes other reports will be obtained, either by order of the court or by the defence.
These can include medical reports (if the defendant has a physical condition) or a psychiatric report.
If the court is contemplating a sentence pursuant to the Mental Health Act 1983 then it must receive evidence from two medical practitioners stating that in their opinion the defendant is suffering from a mental disorder
The Code – approach to sentencing
The Code confirms the approach the court should take as:
Determine offence seriousness (i.e. harm and culpability).
Consider aggravating factors (i.e. those increasing seriousness), both statutory (e.g. previous relevant convictions, on bail, racial, religious, disability or sexual aggravation) and other non-statutory matters (e.g. alcohol, abuse of power, breach of trust).
Consider mitigating factors (i.e. those reducing seriousness), e.g. those relating to the offence, such as provocation or excessive self-defence; and those relating to the offender, such as positive good character, offender’s vulnerability, mental health, remorse or other personal mitigation.
Consider any assistance given to the prosecution.
Consider the appropriate reduction for any guilty plea.
Consider totality.
Appropriate ancillary orders must be considered e.g. compensation, disqualification, forfeiture, restraining order, costs, surcharge, Criminal Courts Charge.
Determining sentence
Determine which category of the sentencing guidelines applies
Then
Adjust the starting point up or down according to aggravating/ mitigating factors
Then
Reduce sentence to credit any guilty plea
Then
If multiple offences, ensure the final, overall sentence is just and proportionate
Category
For most offences, the sentencing guidelines set out the appropriate range of sentence based on:
Greater culpability and greater harm.
Greater culpability and lesser harm, or greater harm and lesser culpability.
Lesser culpability and lesser harm.
The highest level of offence category would be 1, the lowest 3, and the middle category 2.
The guideline will then provide a sentence starting point and range for each category.