Session 9 - Resource Allocation and Patient Reported Outcomes Flashcards
State and explain the 2 types of rationing
Implicit rationing:
- The allocation of resources through individual clinical decisions WITHOUT the criteria for the decisions being explicit
Explicit rationing:
- Use of institutional procedures for the systematic allocation of resources within the health care system
Explain the negatives for each type of rationing
Implicit rationing:
- Open to abuse
- Can lead to discrimination or inequality
- Decisions based on perceptions of social deservedness
Explicit rationing:
- Very complex e.g. assessments required for efficiency and equity
- Impacts clinical judgement/freedom
- Heterogeneity of patients and illness (one size doesn’t fit all!)
Explain how opportunity cost is measured
Opportunity cost is measured by the benefits foregone (seen as sacrifice rather than financial expenditure)
Explain technical efficiency and allocative efficiency
Technical efficiency:
- Interested in the most efficient way of meeting a need e.g. hospital or community based
Allocative efficiency:
- Choice between the many needs to be met i.e. where to allocate the care e.g. hip replacement or neonatal care
List the 4 types of economic evaluation and briefly explain the method of each
- Cost minimisation analysis
- Only focused on cost (not output/benefit etc.) - Cost effectiveness analysis
- Used to compare drugs/treatments with a common health outcome i.e. is extra benefit worth the extra cost? - Cost benefit analysis
- All inputs and outputs are valued in monetary terms (reflects how much are you willing to pay analogy) - Cost utility analysis
- A specific type of cost effectiveness analysis which focuses on quality of health outcomes that are produced or foregone
- Uses QALY (quality adjusted life years)
Explain how QALY is calculated and what it takes into account
1 QALY is 1 year of perfect health
QALY takes into account quality of live and quantity of life
List 3 criticisms of QALYs
- Don’t assess impact on carers or family
- May disadvantage common conditions
- Based on lots of assumptions - so technical problems with the calculations
State the meaning of patient reported outcomes (PROs)
Patient reported outcomes is the status of a patient’s health condition reported directly from the patient, without interpretation from a clinician
Explain the meaning of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs)
Patient reported outcome measures are tools or instruments used to measure patient reported outcomes - allows for the conversion of subjective experiences into numerical values
Define quality of life (QoL)
Multidimensional concept that includes domains related to physical, mental, emotional and social functioning
Define health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and give 3 samples of quality of life that are routinely measured
Functional effect of an illness and its consequent therapy on a patient, as perceived by the patient
- Psychological well being
- Physical dysfunction
- Cognitive functioning
List the 2 important properties of PROMs and briefly explain what they mean
- Reliability - is the instrument accurate over time and consistent?
- Validity - does the instrument measure what it’s supposed to measure?
State the 2 types of PROMs
- Generic
```
2. Specific
subsections
- Disease specific
- Site specific
- Dimension specific
~~~
List the 5 dimensions of EQ-5D and the 3 different levels for each dimension
- Mobility
- Self-care
- Usual activities
- Pain/discomfort
- Anxiety/depression
3 levels:
- No problems
- Some/moderate problems
- Extreme problems
List 2 advantages and disadvantages of generic instruments and same for specific instruments
Generic instruments:
Advantages:
- Enables comparison across condition and treatment groups
- Can be used for a range of health problems
Disadvantages:
- Generic nature means they are less detailed
- Less acceptable to patients (less relevant to them)
Specific instruments: Advantages: - Content is very detailed and relevant - Sensitive to change Disadvantages: - Comparison is limited - Might not detect unexpected outcomes