Session 5 Flashcards
Source Selection Process and Techniques (FAR 15.1)
Best Value Continuum
R2P2C
Best Value Continuum
–Any one or combination of source selection approaches
–Relative importance of cost or price may vary
•Requirements
•Risk
•Past Performance
•Cost
Source Selection Process and Techniques (FAR 15.1)
Tradeoff Process
Tradeoff Process
–Tradeoffs among cost or price and non-cost factors
–Permits the Government to make an award to other than the lowest priced proposal
Source Selection Process and Techniques (FAR 15.1)
Oral Presentation
Oral Presentations
–Substitute or augment written information
–Provide opportunity for dialog between the parties
–May occur at any time in the acquisition process
–Subject to the same restrictions as written information, regarding time and content
Solicitation and Receipt of Proposals and Information (FAR 15.2)
Information Exchange
RFI VS RFP
Information Exchange
–Purpose
•Improve the understanding of Government requirements and industry capabilities
–Techniques to promote early exchange of information
–RFI vs. RFP
–Responses to RFIs must be safeguarded from unauthorized disclosure
Solicitation and Receipt of Proposals and Information (FAR 15.2)
Part I—The Schedule
SCF/SS$C/SOWSPEC/PM/IA/DELANDPERF/CAD/SPECIAL CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS
Part I—The Schedule A Solicitation/contract form B Supplies or services and prices/costs C Description/specifications/statement of work D Packaging and marking E Inspection and acceptance F Deliveries or performance G Contract administration data H Special contract requirements
Solicitation and Receipt of Proposals and Information (FAR 15.2)
Part II—Contract Clauses
Part II—Contract Clauses
I Contract clauses
Solicitation and Receipt of Proposals and Information (FAR 15.2)
Part III—List of Documents, Exhibits, and Other Attachments
Part III—List of Documents, Exhibits, and Other Attachments
J List of attachments
Solicitation and Receipt of Proposals and Information (FAR 15.2)
Part IV—Representations and Instructions
REPS,CERTS,STATMENTS/INST,CONDITION,OFFEROR/EVAL FACTOR
Part IV—Representations and Instructions
K Representations, certifications, and other statements of offerors or respondents
L Instructions, conditions, and notices to offerors or respondents
M Evaluation factors for award
Solicitation and Receipt of Proposals and Information (FAR 15.2)
Amendments and Late Submissions
Amendments
–Issued when either before or after receipt of proposals, the Government changes its requirements or terms and conditions
•Late Submissions
–Proposals, modifications, or revisions need to be received in the designated Government office on or before the exact time specified in the solicitation
Solicitation and Receipt of Proposals and Information (FAR 15.2)
TIME OF RECEIPT
WITHDRAWL
Acceptable evidence to establish time of receipt
–Time/date stamp on proposal wrapper
–Other documentary evidence, or
–Oral testimony or statements of Government personnel
•Withdrawals
–May withdraw a proposal any time prior to award
Source Selection (FAR 15.3)
Source Selection Objective
Basis of Award Decision
Source Selection Objective
–Select the proposal that represents the best value
•Basis of Award Decision
–Evaluation of factors and significant subfactors
–Tailored to the acquisi
Source Selection (FAR 15.3) Evaluation factors and significant subfactors
Evaluation factors and significant subfactors
–Represent key areas of importance and emphasis to be considered in the source selection decision, and
–Support meaningful comparison and discrimination between and among competing proposals
Source Selection (FAR 15.3)
Selection is within the broad discretion of agency acquisition officials, subject to:
$qltyPP
Selection is within the broad discretion of agency acquisition officials, subject to:
•Price or cost shall be evaluated in every source selection
•Quality shall be addressed through consideration of one or more non-cost evaluation factors
•Past Performance (considered as an evaluation sub-factor under the “quality” evaluation factor)
Source Selection (FAR 15.3) Proposal Evaluation (FAR 15.305) NOCA
Proposal Evaluation (FAR 15.305)
–Evaluated based on factors and subfactors set forth in the solicitation
–May use any method or combination of methods
•Color or adjectival ratings
•Numerical weights
•Ordinal rankings
Source Selection (FAR 15.3)
Cost or price evaluation
Past performance
–Cost or price evaluation
•Competition establishes price reasonableness
•Cost analysis may also be necessary to establish price reasonableness
–Past performance
•Currency and relevancy of information
•Source of information
•Context of the data
•General trends in contractor’s performance