CFCM Contracting By Negotiation 15 Emergency Acquisitions Session 5 Flashcards
Source Selection Process and
Techniques (FAR 15.1) 1
R2P2C
Best Value Continuum
Any one or combination of source selection approaches
Relative importance of cost or price may vary
Requirements
Risk
Past Performance
Cost
Source Selection Process and
Techniques (FAR 15.1) 2
TRADEOFF FOR OTHER THAN COST
Tradeoff Process
Tradeoffs among cost or price and non- cost factors
Permits the Government to make an award to other than the lowest priced proposal
Source Selection Process and
Techniques (FAR 15.1) 3
ORAL DIALOG AT ANY TIME SAME RESTRICTION AS WRITTEN
Oral Presentations
Substitute or augment written information
Provide opportunity for dialog between the parties
May occur at any time in the acquisition
process
Subject to the same restrictions as written information, regarding time and content
Source Selection Process and
Techniques (FAR 15.2) 4
INFO EXCHANGE INCREASES REQUIREMENTS AND INDUSTRY CAPABILITIES
Information Exchange
Purpose
Improve the understanding of Government requirements
and industry capabilities
Source Selection Process and
Techniques (FAR 15.2) 5
RFI VS RFP NO UNAUTHORIZED INFO RELEASED
Techniques to promote early exchange of information
RFI vs. RFP
Responses to RFIs must be safeguarded from
unauthorized disclosure
Uniform Contract Format 1 SCHEDULE SCF/SS$C/SOW AND SPEC/ PM/IA/DELIVER AND PREFORM/ CAD/SPECIAL CONTRACT REQS
Part I—The Schedule A Solicitation/contract form B Supplies or services and prices/costs C Description/specifications/statement of work D Packaging and marking E Inspection and acceptance F Deliveries or performance G Contract administration data H Special contract requirements
Uniform Contract Format 2
CONTRACT CLAUSE
DOCS,EXHB,ATTACHMENTS
J LIST OF ATTACHMENTS
Part II—Contract Clauses
I Contract clauses
Part III—List of Documents, Exhibits, and Other Attachments
J List of attachments
Uniform Contract Format 3 REPS AND INSTRUCTIONS K REPS CERTS AND STATEMENTS OF OFFERORS L INSTR, COND, NOTICE TO OFFERORS M EVAL FACTORS TO AWARD
Part IV—Representations and Instructions
K Representations, certifications, and other statements of offerors or respondents
L Instructions, conditions, and notices to offerors or respondents
M Evaluation factors for award
Solicitation and Receipt of Proposals
and Information (FAR 15.2) (cont’d) 1
AMENDMENTS LATE SUBMISSION
Amendments
Issued when either before or after receipt of proposals, the Government changes its requirements or terms and conditions
Late Submissions
Proposals, modifications, or revisions need to be received in the designated Government office on or before the exact time specified in the solicitation
Solicitation and Receipt of Proposals and Information (FAR 15.2) (cont’d) 2
TIME DATE STAMP
ORAL WITHDRAW AT ANY TIME
Acceptable evidence to establish time of
receipt
Time/date stamp on proposal wrapper
Other documentary evidence, or
Oral testimony or statements of Government personnel
Withdrawals
May withdraw a proposal any time prior to award
Source Selection (FAR 15.3) 1 BV of FACTORS SUBFACTORS
Source Selection Objective Select the proposal that represents the best value Basis of Award Decision Evaluation of factors and significant subfactors Tailored to the acquisition
Source Selection (FAR 15.3) (cont’d) 2 EVAL FACTORS AND SUB FACTORS TO discriminate between and among competing proposals
Evaluation factors and significant
subfactors
Represent key areas of importance and emphasis to be considered in the source selection decision, and
Support meaningful comparison and discrimination between and among competing proposals
Source Selection (FAR 15.3) (cont’d) 3 agency acquisition officials Price or cost shall be evaluated in every source selection Quality = one or more non-cost evaluation factors Past Performance (considered as an evaluation sub-factor under the “quality” evaluation factor)
Selection is within the broad discretion of
agency acquisition officials, subject to:
Price or cost shall be evaluated in every source
selection
Quality shall be addressed through consideration of one or more non-cost evaluation factors
Past Performance (considered as an evaluation sub-factor under the “quality” evaluation factor)
Source Selection (FAR 15.3) (cont’d) 4
Color or adjectival ratings
Numerical weights
Ordinal rankings
Proposal Evaluation (FAR 15.305)
Evaluated based on factors and subfactors set forth in the solicitation
May use any method or combination of methods
Color or adjectival ratings
Numerical weights
Ordinal rankings
Source Selection (FAR 15.3) (cont’d) 5 PRICE REASONABLES
Cost or price evaluation
Competition Cost analysis Past performance CAPP
Currency SOURCE, and relevancy of information
DATA CONTEXT AND contractor’s performance
Cost or price evaluation Competition establishes price reasonableness Cost analysis may also be necessary to establish price reasonableness Past performance Currency and relevancy of information Source of information Context of the data General trends in contractor’s performance
Source Selection (FAR 15.3) (cont’d) 6
Exchanges with offerors after receipt of
proposals
Clarifications
Discussions (must be tailored to the individual offer if held after establishment of the competitive range)
Contracting Officer may accept proposal revisions during discussions
Negotiations
Exchanges with offerors after receipt of
proposals (FAR 15.306)
Clarifications
Discussions (must be tailored to the individual offer if held after establishment of the competitive range)
Contracting Officer may accept proposal revisions during discussions
Negotiations
Source Selection (FAR 15.3) (cont’d) 7
LIMITS OF EXCHANGE NO FAVOR 1 OVER THE OTHER
NO TECHNICAL SOLUTION OR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
Limits on Exchanges (FAR 15.306e)
Government personnel involved in the acquisition shall not engage in conduct that
Favors one offeror over another
Reveals an offeror’s technical solution or any information that would compromise an offeror’s intellectual property
Source Selection (FAR 15.3) (cont’d) 8 Limits on Exchanges PRICE REFERENCE PERSON OR PAST PERFORMANCE
Limits on Exchanges (FAR 15.306e)
Reveals an offeror’s price
Reveals the names of individual providing reference information about an offeror’s past performance
Knowingly furnish source selection information
Source Selection (FAR 15.3) (cont’d) 9
INDEPENDENT DECISION
COMPARATIVE ASSESSMENT VS SOURCE SELECTION CRITERIA
Source Selection Authority (SSA) (FAR 15.308) Decision must be Made independently Based on a comparative assessment of proposals against all source selection criteria in the solicitation