Serious Assaults Flashcards

1
Q

Wounds with Intent to GBH, section/elements?

A

Section 188(1) CA1961

With intent to cause GBH
To Any person
Wounds
Any person

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Wounds with intent to Injure, Section/Elements?

A

Section 188(2) CA1961

With intent to injure any person
Wounds
Any person

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Injures with Intent to Wound, Section/elements?

A

Section 189(1) CA1961

With intent to cause GBH
To anyone
Injures
Any person

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Injuring intent to injure, Section/elements?

A

Section 189(2)CA1961

With intent to Injure any person
Injured
Any person

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Case law intent

A

R v Collister- intent is is inferred with words,actions before during and after the incident. The surrounding circumstances. The nature of the act itself.

R v Taisilika- the nature of the blow and gash which it produced, point strongly to the necessary intent.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Injury defined

A

Section 2, CA1961- Actual bodily harm.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Person defined

A

Gender neutral- proved by Judicical
Notice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Case law Wound

A

R v Waters- the breaking of the skin evidenced by the flow of blood

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Aggravated wounding, Section/elements? A,b,c.

A

Section 191, CA1961
-intent to
A) commit or facilitate the commission of any imprisonable offence
B)avoid detection of himself or another person
C)avoid arrest of himself or another upon the commission of any offence

Wounds
Stupefies
Maims
Renders unconscious
Renders incapable of resistance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Case law Aggravated Wounding

A

R V Tihi- offender meant to cause the specified harm.

R v Waiti- there must be proof of the commission of an offence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

GBH defined

A

DPP v Smith- bodily harm needs no explanation and grievous means no more and no less than really serious.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Intent- elements

A

1)Intent to do a deliberate act
2) Intent to get a specific result

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly