Serious Assaults Flashcards

1
Q

Wounding with intent (1) liability

A

S188(1) CA 1961

With intent to cause GBH

To any person

Wounds OR maims OR disfigures OR causes GBH

To any person

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Wounding with intent (2) liability:

A

s188(2) CA 1961

with intent to injure any person or with reckless disregard for the safety of others

Wounds OR mains OR disfigures OR causes GBH

To any person

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Injuring with intent (1) liability

A

s189(1) CA 1961

With intent to cause GBH

To any person

Injures

Any person

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Injuring with intent (2)

A

s189(2) CA 1961

With intent to injure any person or with reckless disregard for the safety of others

Injures

Any person

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Aggravated wounding liability

A

s191(1) CA 1961

With intent

A) to commit or facilitate the commission of any imprisonable offence OR

B) to avoid detection of himself or of any other person in the commission of an imprisonable offence OR

C) to avoid arrest or facilitate flight of himself or any other person upon the finishing of an imprisonable offence

Wounds OR maims OR disfigures OR causes GBH OR stupefies OR renders unconscious OR by any other violent means renders any person incapable of resistance

Any person

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

R v Taisalika

A

The nature of the blow and the hash it produced point strongly to the prescence of the necessary intent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Cameron v R

A

Recklessness is established if

The defendant recognised that there was a real possibility that

  • his actions would bring about the proscribed result
  • the proscribed circumstances exist

Having regard to that risk those actions were unreasonable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

R v Tipple

A

Recklessness requires the offender to know of or have a concious appreciation of the relevant risk, and requires a deliberate decision to run the risk

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

R v MacArthur

A

Bodily harm is any hurt or discomfort

To interfere with the health or comfort

Need not be permanent

Must be more than transitory or trifling

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

DPP V Smith

A

Grievous bodily harm is really serious harm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

R v Waters

A

A wound is the breaking of the skin evidenced by the flow of blood internal or external

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Maims definition

A

Mutilating or disabling a part of the body

Needs some degree or permanence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Disfigures definition

A

Deform or deface

Alter the appearance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

R v Rapana and Murray

A

Disfigure covers permanent and temporary change

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Injure definition

A

Cause actual bodily harm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Doctrine of transferred malice

A

It is not necessary that the person suffering the harm was the intended victim

17
Q

R v Sturm

A

In agg wounding, it is not necessary for prosecution to prove the intended crime was actually committed

Also: stupefy means have effect on nervous system

18
Q

R v Wati

A

Must be proof of a finishing or attempted commission of an offence

19
Q

R v Tihi

A

In addition to (a)-(c), must also prove that offender meant to cause the harm or foresaw the risk of his actions