Serious Assault Flashcards

1
Q

WOUNDING WITH INTENT

Crimes Act 1961, Section 188(1)

A
  • With intent to cause GBH
  • To anyone
  • Wounds, Maims, Disfigures or causes GBH
  • Any person
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Crimes Act 1961 Section 188(1)

Penalty?

A

WOUNDING WITH INTENT (cause GBH)

14 years

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Crimes Act 1961, Section 188(2)

Penalty?

A

WOUNDING WITH INTENT (to injure/reckless)

7 years

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Wounding with Intent

Crimes Act 1961, Section 188(2)

A
  • With intent to injure anyone
    OR
  • With reckless disregard for the safety of others
  • Wounds, maims, disfigures or causes GBH
  • To any person
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Injuring with Intent

Crimes Act 1961, Section 189(1)

A
  • With Intent to cause GBH
  • To any person
  • Injures
  • Any person
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Crimes Act, Section 189(1)

Penalty?

A

Injures with intent to GBH

10 years

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Injuring with Intent

Crimes Act 1961, Section 189(2)

A
-With intent to injure anyone
OR
- With reckless disregard for the safety of others
- Injures
- Any Person
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Crimes Act Section 189(2)

Penalty?

A

Injures with intent to Injure/Reckless

5 years

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Intent

A
  • To commit the act

- and get a specific result

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

R v Taisalika

A

The nature of the blow and the gash which it produced point strongly to the presence of the necessary intent.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Reckless

A

The conscious and deliberate taking of an unjustified risk.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

R v HARNEY

A

Reckless means the conscious and deliberate taking of an unjustified risk.
Proof the consequence complained of could well of happened, together with an intention to continue the course of conduct regardless of risk

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

R v TIPPLE

A

Recklessness offender know of the risk or have conscious appreciation of the risk and requires a deliberate decision to run the risk.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

R v WATERS

A

Wound, Breaking of the skin with blood flow. Maybe internal or external.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Disfigure

A

external injury that detracts from the personal appearance.

does not need to be permanent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Crimes Act Section 191(1)

A

Aggravated Wounding

  • With Intent:
    a) To commit or facilitate the commission of an imprisonable offence
    b) To avoid detection of himself or of any other person in the commission of any imprisonable offence
    c) To avoid arrest or facilitate the flight of himself or of any other person upon the commission or attempted commission of any imprisonable offence
  • Wounds, Maims, Disfigures, Causes GBH to OR Stupefies, renders unconscious OR, by any violent means renders any person incapable of resistance
  • Any person
17
Q

Crimes Act 191(2)

A

Aggravated Wounding

  • With Intent:
    a) To commit or facilitate the commission of an imprisonable offence
    b) To avoid detection of himself or of any other person in the commission of any imprisonable offence
    c) To avoid arrest or facilitate the flight of himself or of any other person upon the commission or attempted commission of any imprisonable offence
  • Injures
  • Any person
18
Q

Aggravated Wounding- Section 191(1)

Penalty?

A

14 Years

19
Q

Aggravated Wounding - Section 191(2)

Penalty?

A

7 Years

20
Q

R v TIHI

A

Relation to 191
In addition to (a) - (c) must be shown the Offender meant to cause the specified harm or foresaw that the actions undertaken by them were likely to expose others to the risk of suffering it.

21
Q

R v STURM - 191(1)(a)

A

Under section 191(1)(a) it is not necessary for the prosecution to prove the intended crime was actually subsequently committed

22
Q

R v STURM Stupefy

A

means to cause an effect on the mind or nervous system which really seriously interferes with that persons mental or physical ability to act in any way which might hinder an intended crime