SERIOUS ASSAULT Flashcards

1
Q

WOUNDING WITH INTENT - TO CAUSE GBH

A

188(1) CA

  • WITH INTENT TO CAUSE GBH
  • TO ANY PERSON
  • WOUNDS/MAIMS/DISFIGURES/CAUSED GBH
  • TO ANY PERSON
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

INTENT - 188(1)

A

MUST BE AN INTENTION TO
- COMMIT THE ACT AND GET SPECIFIC RESULT

MUST BE DELIBERATE. MORE THAN INVOLUNTARY OR ACCIDENTAL

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

INTENT CASE LAW

A

TAISALIKA
- THE NATURE OF THE BLOW AND THE GASH WHICH IS PRODUCED POINTS STRONGLY TO THE PRESENCE OF THE NECESSARY INTENT

COLLISTER
CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE
- ACTION AND WORDS BEFORE, DURING, AFTER
- SURROUNDING CIRCUMSTANCES
-THE NATURE OF THE ACT ITSELF
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

GBH DEFINED AS

A

REALLY SERIOUS HARM

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

GBH CASE LAW

A

BODILY HARM NEEDS NO EXPLANATION

GRIEVOUS MEANS NO MORE AND NO LESS THAN REALLY SERIOUS HARM

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

188(1) TO ANY PERSON

188(2) TO ANY PERSON

A
  • GENDER NEUTRAL
  • JUDICIAL NOTICES OR PROVED BY CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE
  • AGE OF VICTIM IRRELEVANT

DOCTRINE OF TRANSFERRED MALICE:
- WRONG TARGET BEING STRUCK STILL MAKES YOU CRIMINALLY LIABLE

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

WOUND - CASE LAW

A

WATERS

- BREAKING OF THE SKIN EVIDENCED BY THE FLOW OF BLOOD. INTERIOR OR EXTERIOR

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

MAIMS DEFINED AS

A
  • DEPRIVE VICTIM OF USE OF A LIMB OR SENSOR

- SOME DEGREE OF PERMANENCY

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

DIFIGURES DEFINED AS

A

DEFORM OR DEFACE, TO MAR OR ALTER APPERANCE OF FIGURE

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

DISFIGURE CASE LAW

A

RAPANA AND MURRAY

DISFIGURES COVERS NOT ONLY PERMANENT DAMAGE BUT ALSO TEMPORARY

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

WOUNDING WITH INTENT - TO INJURE OR WITH RECKLESS DISREGARD

A

188(2) CA

  • WITH INTENT TO INJURE ANY PERSON OR
  • WITH RECKLESS DISREGARD FOR THE SAFETY OF OTHERS
  • WOUNDS/MAIMS/DISFIGURES/CAUSES GBH
  • TO ANY PERSON
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

INJURE DEFINED AS

A

ACTUAL BODILY HARM

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

INJURE CASE LAW

A

MCARTHUR
BODILY HARM INCLUDES ANY HURT OR INJURY CALCULATED TO INTERFERE WITH THE HEALTH OR COMFORT OF THE VICTIM.
DOESN’T HAVE TO BE PERMANENT BUT MORE THAN TRANSITORY AND TRIFLING

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

RECKLESS DEFINED AS

A

MUST BE PROVED:

  • THE DEFENDANT CONSCIOUSLY AND DELIBERATELY RAN A RISK (A SUBJECTIVE TEST)
  • THAT THE RISK WAS ONE THAT WAS UNREASONABLE TO TAKE IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES AS THEY WERE KNOWN TO THE DEFENDANT (OBJECTIVE TEST)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

RECKLESS CASE LAW

A

HARNEY

  • A CONSCIOUS AND DELIBERATE TAKING OF AN UNJUSTIFIED RISK
  • INVOLVES PROOF THAT THE CONSEQUENCE COMPLAINED OF COULD WELL HAPPEN, TOGETHER WITH AN INTENTION TO CONTINUE THE COURSE OF CONDUCT REGARDLESS OF THE RISK

TRIPPLE
- RECKLESSNESS- THE OFFENDER KNOW OF OR HAVE A CONSCIOUS APPRECIATION OF THE RELEVANT RISK AND IT MAY BE SAID THAT IR REQUIRES A DELIBERATE DECISION TO RUN THE RISK

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

AGGRAVATED WOUNDING

A

191(1) CA
WITH INTENT:
A) COMMIT OR FACILITATE COMMISSION OF ANY IMPRISONABLE OFFENCE
B)TO AVOID DETENTION OF SELF OR ANY OTHER PERSON IN THE COMMISSION OF ANY IMPRISONABLE OFFENCE
C) TO AVOID ARREST OR FACILITATE THE FLIGHT OF SELF OR OTHER UPON COMMISSION OR ATTEMPTED COMMISSION

17
Q

TO AVOID ARREST OF FACILITATE OF SELF OR OTHER UPON COMMISSION OR ATTEMPTED COMMISSION - CASE LAW

A

WATI
- MUST BE PROOF OF COMMISSION OF ATTEMPTED COMMISSION OF A CRIME BY PERSON COMMITTING ASSAULT OR BU PERSON WHOSE ARREST HE INTENDS TO FACILITATE

18
Q

AGGRAVATED WOUNDING CASE LAW

A

TIHI
- IN ADDITION TO A-C MUST BE SHOWN THE DEFENDANT MEANT TO CAUSE THE SPECIFIED HARM OR FORESAW THAT THE ACTIONS UNDERTAKEN BY HIM WERE LIKELY TO EXPOSE OTHERS TO SUFFERING

19
Q

STUPEFIES DEFINED AS

A

INDUCES STATE OF STUPOR, TO MALE STUPID/GROGGY OR INSENSIBLE TO DULL THE SENSES

20
Q

STUPEFIES CASE LAW

A

STURM
- CAUSE AN EFFECT ON THE MIND OR NERVOUS SYSTEM OF A PERSON WHICH REALLY SERIOUSLY INTERFERES WITH THE PERSONS MENTAL OR PHYSICAL ABILITY TO ACT IN ANYWAY THAT MIGHT HINDER AN INTENDED CRIME

21
Q

RENDER UNCONSCIOUS ANY PERSON DEFINED AS

A

RENDER = CAUSE TO BE OR CAUSE TO BECOME

THE OFFENDERS ACTIONS MUST CAUSE THE VICTIM TO LOSE CONSCIOUSNESS

22
Q

BY ANY VIOLENT MEANS RENDERS ANY PERSON INCAPABLE OF RESISTANCE

A

VIOLENT MEANS = NOT LIMITED TO PHYSICAL VIOLENCE. MAY INCLUDE THREATS OF VIOLENCE DEPENDING ON THE CIRCUMSTANCES

23
Q

INCAPABLE OF RESISTANCE CASE LAW

A

CROSSAN

- INCAPABLE OF RESISTANCE - INCLUDES A POWERLESSNESS OF THE WILL AS WELL AS A PHYSICAL INCAPACITY