ABDUCTION/KIDNAPPING Flashcards

1
Q

ABDUCTION

A

208 CA
- UNLAWFULLY
-TAKES AWAY or DETAINS
-A PERSON
- WITHOUT THEIR CONSENT or WITH CONSENT OBTAINED BY FRAUD OR DURESS
- WITH INTENT TO:
A) GO THROUGH A FORM OF MARRIAGE OR CIVIL UNION or
B) HAVE SEXUAL CONNECTION WITH THE PERSON
or
C) CAUSE THE PERSON TO DO A OR B WITH SOME OTHER PERSON

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

UNLAWFULLY DESCRIBED AS

A

WITHOUT LAWFUL JUSTIFICATION OR EXCUSE

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

TAKES AWAY OR DETAINS CASE LAW

A

CROSSAN

- TAKES AWAY AND DETAINING ARE SEPERATE AND DISTINCT OFFENCES

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

TAKES AWAY CASE LAW

A

WELLARD
- ESSENCE OF OFFENCE OF KIDNAPPING IS THE DEPRIVATION OF LIBERTY, COUPLED WITH CARRYING AWAY FROM THE PLACE THE VICTIM WANTS TO BE

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

DETAINS CASE LAW

A

PRYCE
DETAINING IS AN ACTIVE CONCEPT MEANING KEEP IN CONFINEMENT OR CUSTODY
THIS IS IN CONTRAST TO PASSIVE CONCEPT OF HARBOURING OR MERE FAILURE TO HAND OVER

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

209A CRIMES ACT

A

FOR SECTION 208/209, A PERSON UNDER 16 CANNOT CONSENT TO BEING TAKEN AWAY OR DETAINED

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

CONSENT OBTAINED BY FRAUD DEFINED AS

A

DECEIVING THE VICTIM INTO AGREEING TO A PROPOSITION BY MISREPRESENTING THE FACTS OR THEIR INTENTION

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

CONSENT OBTAINED BY DURESS DEFINED AS

A

ACQUIESCE (ACCEPTING) AN OFFENDERS DEMANDS BASED ON FEAR IF THEY DONT

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

WITH INTENT TO GO THROUGH A FORM OF MARRIAGE/CIVIL UNION OR HAVE SEXUAL CONNECTION

A

MARRIAGE/SEXUAL CONNECTION APPEAR ONLY AS MATTER OF INTENT

NOT NECESSARY TO PROVE OCCURRED OR ATTEMPTED

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

WITH INTENT TO CASE LAW

A

MOHI
OFFENCE COMMITTED AT THE TIME OF TAKING AWAY AS LONG AS THE INTENT WAS THERE AT THAT MOMENT.
NOT NECESSARY TO SHOW THE INTENT WAS CARRIED OUT

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

KIDNAPPING

A

209 CA
- UNLAWFULLY
- TAKES AWAY OR DETAINS
- A PERSON
- WITHOUT THEIR CONSENT OR WITH CONSENT OBTAINED BY FRUAD OR DURESS
- WITH INTENT TO:
A) HOLD HIM/HER FOR RANSOM OR TO SERVICE
B) CAUSE HIM/HER TO BE CONFINED OR IMPRISONED
C) CAUSE HIM/HER TO BE SENT OR TAKEN OUT OF NZ

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

RANSOM DEFINED AS

A

A SUM OF MONEY DEMANDED OR PAID FOR THE RELEASE OF A PERSON BEING HELD CAPTIVE

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

CONFINE DEFINED AS

A

RESTRICTING THEIR MOVEMENT WITH A GEO AREA OR WIDER MEANING OF CURTAILING THEIR ACTIVITY AND EXERCISING CONTROL AND INFLUENCE OVER THEM

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

IMPRISON DEFINED AS

A

PUT THEM IN PRISON OR CONFINE THEM IN A PLACE LIKE PRISON (NARROWER MEANING THAN CONFINE)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

ABDUCTION OF A YOUNG PERSON UNDER 16 - DEPRIVE

A

210(A) CA

  • WITH INTENT TO DEPRIVE PARENT/GUARDIAN/OTHER PERSON HAING THE LAWFUL CARE OR CAHRGE OF A YOUNG PERSON, OF THE POSSESSION OF THE YOUNG PERSON
  • UNLAWFULLY
  • TAKES or ENTICES AWAY or DETAINS
  • THE YOUNG PERSON
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

INTENT 210(1)

A
  • DEPRIVING PARENT MIGHT NOT BE OFFENDERS PRIMARY INTENTION HOWEVER IF THEY KNOW THEUR ACTIONS WILL INEVITABLY CAUSE THAT, THEN DEPRIVING PARENT CAN BE SAID TO BE INTENTIONAL
17
Q

DEPRIVING CASE LAW

A

CHARTRAND
WHETHER THE DEFENDANT HAD AN INNOCENT MOTIVE OR INTENDED POSSESSION FOR SHORT TIME IS BESIDE THE POINT.
DONT HAVE TO PROVE INTENDED TO DEPRIVE PREMARITALLY

18
Q

POSSESSION CASE LAW

A

COX
2 ELEMENTS IN POSSESSION
1. PHYSICAL - ACTUAL OR POTENTIAL PHYSICAL CUSTODY OR CONTROL
2. MENTAL - COMBO OF KNOWLEDGE AND INTENTION.
KNOWLEDGE IN SENSE OF AWARENESS BY THE ACCUSED THAT THE SUBSTANCE IS IN HIS POSSESSION AND HAD AN INTENTION TO EXERCISE POSSESSION

19
Q

UNLAWFULLY 210(A)

A

IF CLAIMS IN GOOD FAITH POSSESSION OF YOUNG PERSON, CANNOT BE CONVICTED UNDER 209/210

20
Q

TAKES OR ENTICES AWAY OR DETAINS

A

IT IS IMMATERIAL WHETHER:

  • YOUNG PERSON CONSENTED
  • YOUNG PERSON TAKEN/GOES AT THEIR OWN SUGGESTION
  • OFFENDER BELIEVED YOUNG PERSON OF OR OVER 16
21
Q

YOUNG PERSON CASE LAW

A

FORREST AND FORREST

THE BEST EVIDENCE POSSIBLE IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES SHOULD BE ADDUCED BY THE PROSECUTION IN PROOF OF THE VICTIMS AGE

22
Q

ABDUCTION OF A YOUNG PERSON UNDER 16 - RECEIVES

A

210(2) CA

  • RECEIVES
  • A YOUNG PERSON
  • KNOWING THAT YOUNG PERSON HAS BEEN UNLAWFULLY TAKEN/ENTICED/DETAINED. WITH INTENT TO DEPRIVE PARENT/GUARDIAN/OTHER PERSON HAING LAWFUL CARE/CHARGE OF HIM/HER, OF THE POSSESSION OF HIM/HER
23
Q

RECIEVES DEFINED AS

A
  • EACH CASE BE A QUESTION OF DEGREE AND FACT
  • INCLUDES PHYSICALLY RECEIVING CUSTODY
  • SEVERAL PEOPLE COULD JOINTLY RECEIVE
24
Q

KNOWLEDGE DEFINED AS

A

OFFENDER MUST KNOW YOUNG PERSON THEY ARE RECEIVING HAS BEEN ABDUCTED

25
Q

KNOWLEDGE CASE LAW

A

AP SIMESTER AND WJ BROOKBANKS
- KNOWING = KNOWING OR CORRECTLY BELIEVING
THE DEFENDANT MAY BELIEVE SOMETHING WRONGLY BUT CANNOT KNOW SOMETHING FALSE