Seminar Questions Flashcards

1
Q

Explain the difference between primary and secondary sources of law? Give two examples of each

A

Primary sources of law are laws passed by the legislative bodies of the UK (Acts of parliament)
- Ex; Case Law and Legislation
Secondary Sources of law is not what the law is but how it is interpreted
- ex; books of authority or peer reviewed journal articles

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are the primary sources of law in the ELS?

A

the primary sources of law include legislation (the law) and case law (judical opinions and court rulings)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Explain three differences between civil law and criminal law

A
  • in civil law the parties involved usually include individuals or institutions whereas in criminal it is the government (crown) prosecuting an individual
  • in civil law disputes usually end up with compensation as punishment whereas in criminal law the dispute will usually end in in imprisonment or probation.
  • civil courts are focused on compensation whereas criminal law is focused on punishment and maintaining public safety
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Explain the difference between procedural law and substantive law

A

substantive law sets out the rule that must be followed
- focuses on law itself such as what behaviours are permitted and prohibited
Procedural Law provides a framework for when someone breaks substantive law and what should be done about it
- dictates the steps involved in enforcing substantive law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Explain the difference between private law and public law

A

Private law governs relationships between individuals
- duties by on individual to another
- Protect individuals rights and interests
Public law governs relations between individuals and the state
- Focuses on regulating society by making sure government actions are lawful

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Provide an outline of ‘the law of equity’ List three examples of equitable remedies

A

Its function is to modify the harshness of common law
Examples;
- Specific performance
- Injunctions
- Rescission

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Explain what is meant by parliamentary sovereignty

A
  • Parliament is the legal authority in the UK
  • Meaning parliament can create or change or end any law
  • Ensures parliament is the highest legal authority
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Explain the normal process by which an Act of Parliament is made (be able to list all stages)

A
  1. First Reading
    - Purely a formality no debating
    - Formal introduction
    - bill is published for the first time
  2. Second reading
    - Government minister or MP responsible for the bill
  3. Committee Stage
    - Line by line examination
    - committee inquires
  4. Report Stage
    - Further amendments may be proposed
    - Could suggest a new provism or amendment
    - Add or change things
  5. Third Reading
    - Bill is handed over
    - An amendment cant be made at this stage
  6. Passes to the other House
    - To follow the stage above again
    - It will ascend back to a third reading if needed amnedements
  7. Consideration of amendments
    - Constraints in making amendments and passing the bill
  8. Final step: royal assent
    - Formality
    - Different than commencement
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Explain the term Royal Assent.

A
  • When the monarch formally approves an act of the legislature
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Explain the Parliament Act Procedure.

A
  • Only seven bills have become acts under the parliament act procedure
  • The procedure sets out the steps that members of the government must take in order to pass a bill
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

How did membership of the EU directly impact upon the principle of parliamentary sovereignty?

A
  1. because they impose laws made outside the domestic legislative process
  2. EU membership introduced complexities that constrained sovereignty as parliament had to navigate the obligations and supremacy of EU law
    - The tension was an issue leading up to brexit and ultimately leading to the UK’s decision to leave the EU
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

How does the Human Rights Act 1998 impact, or not, on parliamentary sovereignty? What sections of the Human Rights Act 1998 are relevant?

A
  • Human rights act does not limit parliamentary sovereignty
  • The main sections are 2,3 and 4
  • Does not undermine parliament’s authority to legislate but encourages the alignment with human rights standards
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Explain the term secondary legislation (also referred to as delegated or subordinate legislation). List three different types of secondary legislation.

A
  • secondary legislation refers to laws that are made by an individual or body under powers given to them by an Act of Parliament
  • 3 types: Rule, regulation and order
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What are the benefits of secondary legislation? What are the possible dangers posed by the use and existence of secondary legislation?

A

While secondary legislation provides significant benefits in terms of efficiency and specificity, it also poses risks related to oversight and democratic accountability. Striking a balance between the two is crucial to ensure that secondary legislation serves its intended purpose without undermining democratic principles.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

With respect to statutory interpretation, outline and explain the ‘literal rule’.

A

The literal rule – the ordinary meaning of the words
- Aims to promote certainty and predictability in the law
- Adheres to the plain meaning of its implications

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

With respect to statutory interpretation, outline and explain the ‘golden rule’.

A

The golden rule is one of the rules of statutory interpretation– where the ordinary
meaning would contradict or limit the intention of Parliament or would lead to an absurdity
- Allows the court to look at all the options after the literal rule and look at what one is the most sensible

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

With respect to statutory interpretation, outline and explain the ‘mischief rule’.

A

The mischief rule – considering the problem the law is trying to address.
- Look at the common law before the statute and understand what the problem was that the statute was trying to solve
- Much narrower
–> Ensures the law is applied in a manner that effectively addresses the specific issues
the legislature intended to remedy, thereby promoting justice and fairness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

With respect to statutory interpretation, outline and explain the ‘purposive approach’.

A

To ensure that statutes are applied in a way that aligns with the legislative intent and effectively addresses the issues the law is meant to resolve.
- Case: pepper v hart
Tax law case about teachers who work at private schools get taxed on

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Explain the difference between intrinsic and extrinsic aids of interpretation. Provide two examples of each.

A

Intrinsic aids - internal to the act
- Courts will look beyond the wording of a provision to other parts of the statute.
- ex; Long title, definitions in the legislation itself

Extrinsic aids - things outside of the act
- Courts will look beyond the statute to other sources that are part of the legislative process, other statues or academic writing.
- ex; academic literature, parliamentary material

20
Q

Explain the ejusdem generis

A

A Latin phrase meaning “of the same kind”. The rule requires that where in a statute there are general words following particular and specific words, the general words must be confined to things of the same kind as those specifically mentioned.

21
Q

Explain the noscitur a sociis

A

Latin for ‘it is known by its associates’, noscitur a sociis is a rule of interpretation of contracts, statutes and estate documents stipulating that the meaning of an unclear word can be gathered from the context in which it is used.

22
Q

Explain the expression unius est exclusion alterius

A

Expressio unius est exclusio alterius is a Latin term used in law that means “to express or include one thing implies the exclusion of the other, or of the alternative.” This means that if a law or contract explicitly mentions one thing, it is assumed that other things are not included or allowed

23
Q

What is meant by a legal presumption? Give one example of a legal presumption.

A
  • a rule of law which permits a court to assume a fact is true until such time as there is a preponderance (greater weight) of evidence which disproves or outweighs (rebuts) the presumption.
  • Provides guidelines for courts and parties involved in legal proceedings, helping to ensure fairness and consistency in the application of the law
24
Q

Explain the term ‘stare decisis’

A

Let the decision stand by and adhere to the decision

25
Q

Explain the term ‘ratio decidendi’.

A

The reason for the decision

26
Q

Explain the term ‘obiter dictum’.

A
  • Something said in passing
  • Refers to comments made by a judge in a legal opinion that are not essential to the decision in the case
27
Q

‘The system of precedent depends on there being a hierarchy of courts’ (Gillespie and Weare 2023:67). Outline the hierarchy of both the criminal and civil court structure within the English Legal System.

A

Civil court
- The county court (& family court)
- High court
- Court of appeal
- Supreme court

Criminal court
- Magistrates court
- Crown court
- High court
- Court of appeal

28
Q

Can the Supreme Court depart from its own decisions?

A

Yes

29
Q

How, if at all, does the Human Rights Act 1998 impact the doctrine of precedent?

A

By the interpretation of legislation, Judicial Precedent, Public Authority Obligations, Common Law development and the impact on appeals and higher courts

30
Q

What are the elements of a criminal offence?

A
  1. Actus reus - a guilty act
    - Describes the wrongful or unlawful conduct
    - Omission to act - failure to fulfill your duty of care
  2. Mens rea - a guilty mind
    - State of mind that the defendant must of had when completing the act or omission
    - Must intend to make unlawful contact or at least foresee the risk that it may result in unlawful contact
  3. No defence
    - Ex; self defence
    –> Acted with an honest belief to need to act in this way
    –> It was a reasonable response considering the situation
31
Q

Is it possible to commit a criminal offence for failing to act? Explain.

A

Yes it is called omission
- can lead to liability if the individual had a responsibility to take action in a particular situation

32
Q

Explain the difference between bail and remand.

A

Bail
- financial arrangement that allows a person to be released from custody while awaiting trial
Remand
- legal order to keep an individual in custody usually because of flight risk or a danger to the community (criminal history)

33
Q

Explain the difference between a summary and indictable offence.

A

Summary offences
- (less serious)
- minor theft, traffic violation
- tried by the lower courts
Indictable offences
- (passed to the Crown Court).
- Murder, robbery
- tried in a higher court
- Magistrates will decide whether to grant bail or other restrictions and then pass the case onto the crown court

34
Q

What is meant by an ‘either way offence’? Can you give an example of an either way offence.

A

Either-way offences (either by the Magistrates Court or the Crown Court)
- Depends on the severity of the case and other factors
- usually more serious than summary offences but less serious than indictable offences
- Ex; theft - depending on the cirumatances such as the value of stolen property

35
Q

What is meant by an Attorney General Reference case?

A

legal mechanism where the Attorney General refers a point of law to a higher court for clarification or determination

36
Q

Outline three reforms introduced in response to the Woolf Review.

A
  • Civil procedure rules
  • Pre- action protocols
  • Small claims track
37
Q

What is ADR? Give two examples of ADR and explain how they each work.

A

Resolving a dispute without going to court
1. Mediation - neutral person helps you reach an agreement
2. Arbitration - go to an independent third party and go to them to make a decision about your dispute and agree to do whatever tehy say
3. Negotiation etc. - you and another party trying to reach an agreement

38
Q

There are now four tracks in the civil justice system. What are they?

A
  1. The small claims track part 27
  2. The fast track part 28
  3. The intermediate track part 28
  4. The multi track part 29
39
Q

Sadiq’s Case

A
40
Q

Thomas’s Case

A
41
Q

Una’s Case

A
42
Q

When is the court bound to follow its own previous decisions?

A

Answer: usually, but there are a series of exceptions.
The Court of Appeal is generally bound by its own decisions but can depart from them under certain circumstances, such as when a previous decision was made per incuriam.

43
Q

Would it be relevant to Sadiq’s case if the previous relevant Court of Appeal decision had been made through carelessness or without due regard to the relevant law?

A

Answer: Yes, as this would be one of the grounds upon which the Court of Appeal can depart from its own previous decisions. [per incuriam]
If a previous decision was reached without considering the relevant law, it may be deemed per incuriam, allowing the Court to depart from it.

44
Q

Which would be most likely to be applied to his case?

A

Answer: the House of Lords’ decision.
The House of Lords (now the Supreme Court) is binding on the Court of Appeal, and a later decision from the House of Lords on the same issue would take precedence over earlier Court of Appeal decisions.

45
Q

Which statement most accurately describes the approach that the court will be able to take?

A

Answer: The Supreme Court is free to reaffirm or reverse the Court of Appeal decision as it sees fit.
The Supreme Court is not bound by its own previous decisions and can choose to overturn them if it finds compelling reasons to do so.

46
Q

You are a law student working at the Citizen’s Advice Bureau. One evening you take a call from a young woman asking you for advice on the law on murder. Which of the following outlines the actus reus and mens rea for murder?

A

The actus reus for murder is an act causing death. The mens rea is an intent to kill or cause GBH

47
Q
A