Seminar 8 - Team Building & Group Dynamics Flashcards

1
Q

What is a team? (Carron & Eys, 2012, p. 14)

A

“a collection of two or more individuals who possess a common identity, have common goals & objectives, share a common fate, exhibit structured patterns of interaction & modes of communication, hold common perceptions about group structure, are personally & instrumentally interdependent, reciprocate interpersonal attraction, & consider themselves to be a group”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is group cohesion? (Carron, Brawley, & Widmeyer, 1998, p. 213)

A

“a dynamic process which is reflected in the tendency for a group to stick together & remain united in the pursuit of its instrumental objectives &/or for the satisfaction of member affective needs”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are the types of group cohesion?

A

Group integration (individual perceptions about the closeness, similarities, bonding within the group - consists of we/us evaluations) - task & social
Group attractiveness (individual motivations that act to retain them to a group - consists of I/me evaluations) - task & social

Task - reflects the degree to which members of a group work together to achieve common goals.
Social - reflects the degree to which members of a team like each other and enjoy one another’s company (interpersonal attraction)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

How can cohesion be measured?

A
  • Group Environment Questionnaire (GEQ, Widmeyer, Brawley, & Carron, 1985)
    Distinguishes between the individual and the group and between task and social concerns.
  • Has been successfully used in both sport and fitness settings, demonstrating reliability and validity.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are the correlates of cohesion in sport teams?

A

Environmental factors
Team factors
Leadership factors
Personal factors

(Carron & Eys, 2012)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Correlates of cohesion in sport teams

What are the environmental factors?

A
  • Proximity — being in close physical contact increases opportunity for interaction and communication.
  • Size — follows inverted U relationship
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Correlates of cohesion in sport teams

What are the personal factors?

A

Satisfaction — can be derived from several sources, e.g., opportunities to feel valued and competent, social relation to others, recognition from others.

Competitive state anxiety — Athletes who perceive their teams to be higher in task cohesion experience less cognitive anxiety and are more likely to view their symptoms of both cognitive and somatic anxiety as facilitative.
* Wolf, Sadler, Eys, and Kleinert (2012) proposed that athletes feel like they have more resources at their disposal, and feel less pressure, when they are members of cohesive teams. Appraisal of situation is challenge instead of threat.

Social loafing - the tendency for individuals to decrease the amount of effort they expend when completing a group task compared to the amount of effort expended when alone.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Personal factors

When does social loafing occur?

A

Occurs across a range of tasks, including physical, cognitive, perceptual, and
evaluative
* Generalises across culture and both sexes
Social loafing increases when:
* The individual’s output cannot be independently evaluated.
* The task is perceived to be low on meaningfulness.
* The individual’s personal involvement in the task is low.
* A comparison against group standards is not possible.
* The individuals contributing to the collective effort are strangers.
* The individual’s teammates or coworkers are seen as high in ability.
* The individual perceives that his contribution to the outcome is redundant.
* The individual is competing against what she believes to be a weaker opponent.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Correlates of cohesion in sport teams

What are the leadership factors?

A

Interrelationships— complex relationship between coach, athletes, cohesiveness and performance
E.g., mutiny
* Some times coach does not play a role in team cohesion (Widmeyer & Williams, 1991)

Coach’s decision styles — can have impact upon team cohesion, e.g., providing autonomy

Transformational coaching — has positive association with cohesion based on 4 influential behaviours:
* Idealized influence
* Inspirational motivation
* Intellectual stimulation
* Individualised consideration

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Correlates of cohesion in sport teams

What are the team factors?

A

Roles
Norms
Group processes
Performance outcomes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What are the two types of roles in sport teams?

A

Formal - Dictated by nature and structure of organisation

Informal - Evolved from interactions among group members

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are the important elements of formal roles in sport teams?

A

Role Ambiguity

Role Acceptance

Role Conflict

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is role ambiguity?

A
  • Scope of responsibility - information about the extent of an individual’s responsibilities
  • Behavioral responsibilities - information about which behaviors are necessary to fulfill an individual’s role responsibilities
  • Evaluation of performance - information about how an individual’s performance of required role responsibilities will be evaluated
  • Consequences of not fulfilling responsibilities - information about the consequences of failing to fulfill requisite role responsibilities
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is role acceptance?

A

based on 4 conditions:
* opportunity to use specialized skills or competencies
* feedback and role recognition
* role significance
* autonomy (the opportunity to work independently)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is role conflict?

A
  • exists when the role occupant doesn’t have sufficient ability, motivation, time, or understanding to achieve that goal despite the presence of consensus on a desired goal or outcome.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What are norms in sport teams?

A

Is a level of performance, pattern of behavior, or belief
Can be formally established or informally developed
Pressure to adhere to their group’s norms, whether the norm is seen as relevant or irrelevant
In sport can take the form of:
* Practice behaviours
* Dress and hairstyle
* Interaction betweens rookies and veterans
* Who takes control in critical situations
Deviation from the expected behaviors might result in informal or formal sanctions.

17
Q

What are the different types of norms in sport teams (Munroe et al., 1999)?

A

Competition
- Maximum effort towards the task
- Supported other members of the team

Practice
- Maximum effort towards the task
- Supported other members of the team

Off-season
- Continual training and development
- Maintaining contact

Social situations
- Expected to attend social events
- Respect for each other

18
Q

How do norms in sport teams affect group cohesion?

A

It is a bidirectional relationship

Norms for productivity
- The standard for effort and performance accepted by the team

Stability
- Norms can persists for generations even after original members are gone
- Important to set positive norms

19
Q

Correlates of cohesion in sport teams

Team factors

What are the group processes?

A

Group goals and rewards — managing this in the presence of individual goals and rewards is paramount to maintain unity

Communications - cohesion increases as level of communication relating to task and social issues increase

20
Q

Correlates of cohesion in sport teams

What are the performance outcomes?

A

Linear relationship between cohesion and performance outcomes

Meta-analysis found (Carron et al., 2002):
* Both task and social cohesion positively related to performance
* Cyclical relationship
* Relationships exist equally across teams, regardless if they were team-based or individual in nature
* Present across all spectrum of skills and competitive level
* Stronger in female teams

21
Q

What is team building?

A
  • “team enhancement or team
    improvement for both task &
    social purposes” (Carron & Eys, 2012, p. 368)
  • Ideally, individuals put their
    personal agendas aside.

Team building uses strategies to help members
work together more effectively and provides
meaningful experiences that ultimately lead to a
greater sense of unity.

22
Q

What are the stages of team development?

A
  1. Forming — coming together, becoming familiar
  2. Storming — resistance to leader/group, interpersonal conflict
  3. Norming — cooperation, solidarity, conflict resolution
  4. Performing — working together to achieve success

(Tuckman, 1965)

23
Q

What are the four stages of the team building approach by Carron, Spink, and Prapavessis (1997)?

A
  1. Introductory - Present overview of benefits of group cohesion
  2. Conceptual - 3 purposes: (a) facilitate communication with coaches about complex concepts, (b) highlight the interrelatedness of various components, & (c) identify focus for interventions
  3. Practical — Have coaches in an interactive brainstorming session regarding potential strategies
  4. Intervention — Protocols & strategies are conducted
24
Q

Why is coach involvement critical in team building interventions?

A
  1. Coaches differ in personality and preferences, so a strategy that might be effectively implemented by one coach might not be by another
  2. Given that groups differ, an intervention strategy that is effective with one group might be ineffective with another. Coaches are the individuals most familiar with their groups and will have a sense for the most appropriate strategies.
  3. Coaches have control over the protocol, which leads to increased coach investment and commitment to team building.
25
Q

What are some other approaches to team building?

A

Values and beliefs building (Crace & Hardy, 1997)
Personal-Disclosure Mutual-Sharing intervention (Dunn & Holt, 2004)
Mastery Approach to Coaching (Smoll & Smith, 2008)
MAPS Model (Veach & May, 2005) — Mission, Assessment, Plan, Systematic Evaluation

26
Q

How can coaches improve cohesion?

A
  • Explain specific individual roles in team success
  • Help players set specific, challenging group goals
  • Encourage group identity & pride (e.g., mottos, shirts, traditions, history)
  • Encourage role modelling of individual sacrifice by senior team members
  • Be decisive
  • Communicate openly effectively
  • Conduct periodic team meetings to allow for athlete input
27
Q

How can team members improve cohesion?

A
  • Get to know other members of the group
  • Help other group members whenever possible
  • Give other group members positive reinforcement
  • Be responsible & accountable
  • Communicate honestly & openly with the coach
  • Resolve conflicts immediately
  • Give 100% effort at all times
28
Q

What is psychological safety?

A

“a belief that the team is safe for interpersonal risk-taking, such as asking for help, admitting one’s errors, or seeking feedback from others”
(Edmondson, 1999)

Links with social identity constructs

4 principles of identity leadership — 1) In-group prototypes; 2) In-group champions; 3) Entrepreneurs of identity; 4) Embedders of identity

May seem conceptually similar to other constructs such as trust, empowerment, engagement, team cohesion.
Most similar is interpersonal trust - willingness to be vulnerable to others whose future actions will be favourable to one’s interest.
Key difference is the direction of the trust — PS is our perception of level of trust others have in us, while IPT is trust we give others.

29
Q

What are the benefits of psychological safety?

A

Empowerment
- intrinsic motivational state wherein team members have a sense of control over their roles and tasks within their team.

Engagement
- team members’ investments of personal resources into their roles and tasks.

Team cohesion
- Possible pressure to conform to group norms and agree with each other.

30
Q

What are the behaviours relating to psychological safety and lack thereof?

A
  • Team members genuinely interested in their teammates
  • Positive intentions to one another
  • Express mutual respect for each other’s competence even and especially when mistakes are made

vs

  • Reluctance to show vulnerability
  • Does not want to appear weak or incompetent to others
  • Feels a threat to self-image
31
Q

What are the team-oriented and individual-oriented pathways which psychological safety works on?

A

Team-oriented pathways
* Team confidence
* Exerted effort
* Attendance levels
* Resilience

Individual-oriented pathways
* Increased well-being
* Less burn-out
* Mentally healthier