semester 2 Flashcards

1
Q

what are the principles of justice and define

A

fairness: fair legal processes are in place, all parties receive a fair hearing

equality: all people are treated the same before the law, with an equal opportunity to present their case.

access: individuals have an understanding of legal rights and ability to pursue their case.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

examples of each principle of justice

A

fairness: decision makers are unbiased and sanctions imposed are based solely on facts.

equality: courts have access to sentencing data to ensure that similar offences receive similar sanctions

access: availability of legal aid in some cases.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

police definition

A

to serve the victorian community and uphold the law to promote a safe secure and orderly society

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

3 roles of police

A

prevention: detterring individuals from engaging in criminal behaviour to reduce crime rates and ensure that society is protected from harm.

investigation: investigating crimes that have already occurred as well as detecting future crime to avoid it from taking place.

prosecution: charging an individual with a crime and conducting legal proceedings against them in a court.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

how are 3 roles of police enforced

A

prevention: patrolling and educating society. searching for proactive crime

investigations: investigating crime scenes and possible crimes / intent to commit a crime

prosecution: police cautions (warnings), summaries in magistrates court, on the spot fines, collect evidence for indictable offences for the office of public prosecutions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what are delegated bodies, plus two examples

A

specialised government agencies given authority by parliament to make and enforce laws within that area.
two examples: vicroads, the australian tax office (ATO)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

4 aspects of police powers

A
  1. right to arrest with warrant
  2. arrest without warrant if they reasonably believe that the person has committed a serious offence, is a danger to themselves or community or if they want to make sure the person will go to court.
  3. obtain persons name and address if they are driving or believed to be a witness / involved in a crime.
  4. the right to question the alleged offender who is in custody.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

3 aspects of court powers

A
  1. decide which evidence is admissible to determine wether evidence is admissible to determine wether an offender is guilty and impose a sanction.
  2. during pre-trial process, prosecution can request that the offender remains in custody if they pose a threat to the community. the court has the ability to decide whether they should remand the accused or grant them bail.
  3. in the trial process, the office of public prosecutions has the right to prosecute the alleged offender, present evidence and witnesses to support their cases and cross examine the accused witnesses to test the reliability of their evidence.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

individual rights when dealing with police

A
  1. when accused is arrested, they dont have to answer any questions, other than name and address.
  2. anyone under 18 must have parent or guardian present during questioning.
  3. right to contact friend or legal rep when in custody.
  4. right to meet with a lawyer in private.
  5. right for their case to be brought before the court in a timely manner.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

individual rights during court proceedings

A
  1. right to have trial heard by an impartial jury for indictable offences.
  2. right to have trial conducted by an impartial 3rd party (judge)
  3. right to have fair and consistent rules of evidence and procedure.
  4. right to have a bail hearing.
  5. presumption of innocence.
  6. right to legal rep (if unable to afford legal aid may supply rep)
  7. right to an interpreter (if needed)
  8. right to present evidence, witnesses and cross examine the prosecution’s witnesses.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

hierarchy definition

A

system in which courts are ranked according to relative status or authority.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

jurisdiction definition

A

which types of cases certain courts can determine

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

original and appellate jurisdiction

A

original: courts power to hear a case at first instance.
appellate: courts power to hear a case on appeal.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

appeal definition

A

request to superior court to review and change an aspect of the decision made in the original court.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

reasons for appeals

A
  1. review of sanction (insufficient or excessive)
  2. law was incorrectly applied / interpreted to reach original decision.
  3. particular fact was misinterpreted or incorrectly applied to reach original decision.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

supreme court - trial division and supreme court - court of appeal jurisdiction

A

trial division: hear all offences but usually hers most serious indictable offences. e.g murder, treason.
can hear criminal appeals from magistrates court on a question of the law.

court of appeal: only hears appeals. hears appeals from criminal cases heard in county court and supreme trial division.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

supreme court trial division and court of appeals, who hears?

A

trial division: if accused pleads ‘not guilty’ the case will be heard before judge and jury. if accused pleads ‘guilty’ the accused will be sentenced by a judge alone.

court of appeal: usually heard before 3 supreme court justices.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

two facts about appeal

A
  1. it may review the verdict given, severity of sentence imposed or a question of law.
  2. right to appeal isnt automatic. offender or prosecution must first receive leave (permission) from court of appeal before having their case heard.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

committal proceedings

A

held for accused charged with an indictable offence who have pleaded ‘not guilty’ or not yet entered a plea.

determine whether prosecutions evidence is sufficient to support a conviction at trial. if so, accused will stand trial in the county court or supreme court.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

administrative convenience

A

separating summary offences and minor criminal matters that are heard by lowest court from the more serious, complex and time consuming cases that are heard in higher courts.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

benefit of administrative convenience

A

allows efficiency, avoids backlog, reduces delays and associated costs:
- superior courts can devote time + resources to long and complex cases, without getting clogged up by having to resolve minor cases.
- lowest court can quickly resolve large number of minor cases, minimising delays for accused and victims.
- expertise in each court for different topics.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

county court jurisdiction

A

-all indictable offences, except those reserved for the supreme court. deal with the most cases overall.
- appeals from magistrates on a conviction or a sentence.
- e.g culpable driving

23
Q

magistrates court jurisdiction

A
  • all summary offences
  • indictable offences heard summarily
  • committal hearings
  • no appellate
24
Q

role of juries in criminal trials

A

deliver verdict in criminal trials that take place in county or supreme court.
only used if person is charged with an indictable offence.
used in small proportion of criminal matters.
not used in magistrates court, cases on appeal or when a person has pleaded guilty.

25
Q

how is a person qualified and liable for jury service

A

18+ years old, enrolled to vote in Vic

26
Q

disqualified, ineligible or excused from jury duty

A

disqualified: criminal record. e.g convicted of indictable offences and sentenced to 3 years jail or more.

ineligible: people within legal profession with expertise that could jeopardise their ability to act as rep of broader society. also people who may not be able to perform the necessary tasks. e.g disability

excused: potential jurors are sent questionnaire of whether they will be required. on day of trial empanelment process (choosing jury)

27
Q

jury pool

A

group of people who attend court in response to a summons for jury service.

28
Q

summons

A

summons is sent at least 10 days before person is required. summons specifies date, time and location.

29
Q

steps for jury selection

A
  1. random selection for pool
  2. judge provides basic info of case
  3. juror may apply to be excused if there is a legitimate reason.
  4. panel members assigned a number each. numbers chosen at random until 12 jurors are selected to form the jury.
  5. both defence and prosecution have right to challenge jurors
  6. take an oath or go back to pool room to see if selected for a different trial by the end of the day.
30
Q

challenges

A

challenges for cause: granted by the court if there is a risk that a potential juror is not impartial or a potential juror is not qualified to sit as a juror.

peremptory challenges (accused): doesn’t need a reason, immediate and permanent. accused allowed 3 if one accused and 2 each if more than one accused.

right to stand aside (prosecution): doesn’t need a reason, juror returns to pool for different case. prosecution can stand aside as many potential jurors as the accused has peremptory challenges.

31
Q

strengths and weaknesses of juries:
fairness strengths

A

trial by peers: accused should feel their case has been decided by equals.

democratic: decisions based on facts and the law not political.

independence: independent of all parties, no connection to victim. accused or witnesses, cannot seek additional info beyond court room.

32
Q

strengths and weaknesses of juries:
fairness weaknesses

A

influence and prejudice: influenced by media, decision based on preconceived ideas.

complexity: cases are complex but undertaken by people with no legal training. chance they don’t apply laws correctly.

delay: time to empanel juries, explain procedures, hung juries and mistrials due to juror misconduct, requiring re-trial.

few in numbers: juries used in small proportions, so juries fairness used in few cases.

33
Q

strengths and weaknesses of juries:
access strengths

A

plain english: easily understood, less legal jargon

34
Q

strengths and weaknesses of juries:
access weaknesses

A

very few accused: few matters tried by jury, so very few accused can access trial by peers.

35
Q

strengths and weaknesses of juries:
equality strengths

A

used in all indictable offences: same opportunity.

36
Q

strengths and weaknesses of juries:
equality weaknesses

A

not available for all types of offences: no opportunity for some

37
Q

fine definition

A

monetary payment court orders offender to pay as penalty for criminal offence.

38
Q

penalty unit

A

amount of money, goes up with inflation

39
Q

community correction order (cco)

A

sanction offender serves while remaining in community with specific conditions. often aims to address underlying cause of criminal behaviour

40
Q

conditions of a cco

A

-mandatory: apply to every offender with a cco
- optional conditions: specific to offender + circumstances

41
Q

mandatory conditions

A

-continuous reporting
- notify for change of address
- must not commit an offence punishable by imprisonment.
- remain in state unless express permission.
- report to ccc within 2 business days after cco comes into force
- compliance with directions

42
Q

optional conditions

A

-treatment + rehab
- unpaid community work
- non association with certain people or groups
- curfew
- place exclusion
- electronic monitoring, must wear device

43
Q

imprisonment:

A

restricting offenders freedom and personal liberties by removing them from community for period of time and under control and supervision of the state.

44
Q

punishment

A

adequate retribution for harm. makes sure victims or family do not feel the need to exact revenge. court that is aiming to punish will enforce more severe sanctions.

45
Q

protection

A

offenders who pose a significant threat to society are moved away from society. also prevents involvement in further criminal activities.
greatest amount of good for greatest amount of people. court trying to protect will have longer term of imprisonment or cco that restricts movement.

46
Q

rehabilitation

A

break cycle of criminal behaviour. target underlying issues / causes.
court aiming to rehab will impose sanction that addresses underlying issues. e.g cco with drug treatment orders, shorter prison sentence.

47
Q

deterrence

A

make an example of offender, stopping would be offenders and og offender. court aiming to deterwill impose more severe sanction.

48
Q

specific deterrence

A

offender personally discouraged.

49
Q

general deterrence

A

general public discouraged

50
Q

denunciation

A

publicly condemn to illustrate courts disapproval of violation of moral and ethical standards of society.
court aiming to denounce will impose more severe sanctions, often with comments stating extent of outrage and condemnation regarding offence.

51
Q

aggravating factors

A

aspects of offence / offender that increase culpability. e.g crime was planned, weapon was used.
pushes court towards more severe sanction

52
Q

mitigating factors

A

aspects of offender / offence that decrease culpability. e.g genuine remorse, not planned, cooperation, trauma.
reduces severity of sanction imposed

53
Q

guilty plea

A

usually reduces sentence, sentencing discount. saves court and society time and money, prosecution doesnt have to prove guilty, minimises delays for other cases, victims dont have to face trauma, stress or revictimisation of giving evidence or going to trial.

54
Q

victim impact statements

A

written and / or verbal statement to the court about impact / severity of offence on victim / family.
impacts considered: physical harm, emotional harm, financial harm.
victim statements about what sanction should be imposed will not influence courts sentencing decision.
if vis states significant impact, court may impose a more severe sanction.
im vis states victim forgives, court may impose less severe sanction.