semester 1 exam revision Flashcards

1
Q

Terms of the Treaty of Versailles

A

The Treaty of Versailles set forth severe conditions for Germany, including the payment of hefty reparations totaling 132 billion gold marks, which devastated its economy. The treaty demanded a reduction of the German military to 100,000 troops, the elimination of conscription, and the dismantling of its air force, with further limitations on its naval forces. Germany also had to cede territories such as Alsace-Lorraine to France and establish the Polish Corridor, disconnecting East Prussia from the main country. Moreover, Germany was compelled to bear sole blame for the conflict, leading to widespread indignation and a profound sense of national disgrace

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the Treaty of Versailles?

A

The Treaty of Versailles was a peace treaty signed on the 28th of June 1919 between Germany and the Allied powers. It ended WW1 and punished Germany for their involvement in starting the war. It required Germany to pay reparations, disarm, lose territory, and give up colonies.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

How did the treaty of Versailles impact Germany?

A

The Treaty of Versailles dealt a crippling blow to Germany’s economy. The hefty reparations demanded by the treaty placed an enormous financial strain on the country, triggering hyperinflation and plummeting the value of the German mark. This economic collapse erased personal savings and led to rampant poverty and unemployment. On a societal level, the treaty inflicted a profound sense of disgrace and bitterness among Germans, who condemned the treaty as an unjust “Diktat” imposed without their consent. The resulting economic despair and national outrage laid the groundwork for the rise of radical political movements and eroded the credibility of the Weimar Republic. Disillusioned by a perceived betrayal from their leaders, many Germans longed for a figure to revive their national pride and economic fortitude.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

How were the Nazis able to come and establish total power

A

In the aftermath of World War I, Germany faced dire economic strife. The early 1920s’ hyperinflation and the 1930s’ Great Depression were disastrous, playing a pivotal role in the ascent of the Nazi Party. The middle class saw their savings evaporate due to hyperinflation, plunging many into poverty and societal distress. The Great Depression only intensified these woes. Amidst such economic turmoil, extremist political factions found eager audiences among those seeking respite. The Nazi Party, under Adolf Hitler’s leadership, seized this opportunity, pledging to restore economic stability and provide jobs. Their promises of rejuvenating the nation and assertive governance struck a chord with citizens disillusioned and forsaken by their existing leaders.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Importance of propaganda during the Holocaust

A

Joseph Goebbels was Adolf Hitler’s Minister of Propaganda and had total control of the press, radio, and all aspects of culture. Propaganda played a crucial role during the Holocaust and was a key instrument for the Nazi Party in gaining and maintaining power. It was used to shape public opinion, promote Nazi ideologies, and prepare the population for the regime’s policies, including the persecution and eventual mass murder of Jews and other groups.
Propaganda was essential in shaping the beliefs and attitudes of the German public, through various media such as posters, films, radio, and children’s books such as the Poisonous Mushroom. Nazi propaganda was a powerful and sinister tool that cast Jews and other minorities in a dehumanizing light, labeling them as inferior and a perilous threat to Germany. It painted Jews as scheming and evil, scapegoating them for the nation’s economic struggles and societal turmoil. This relentless stream of propaganda likened them to pests or contagions, suggesting they needed to be eliminated to preserve the nation’s well-being.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What was Nazi racial ideology?

A

Nazi racial ideology was based on the belief in that the Aryan race, which they defined as the pure Germanic people, characterized by traits such as blond hair and blue eyes, was superior. This ideology held that Aryans were the master race and suggested that other races, particularly Jews, were inferior and a threat to Aryan purity and dominance. This led to policies aimed at preventing the mixing of races, segregating those deemed unfit, and ultimately, the extermination of those considered inferior.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Nazi racial policies

A
  1. Nazi racial policies began as a series of laws and actions aimed at segregating Jews from German society before ultimately exterminating them. The Nuremberg Laws were introduced in 1935. The Reich Citizenship Law and the Law for the Protection of German Blood and German Honour stripped Jews of their German citizenship, prohibited marriages between Jews and Aryans, and imposed severe restrictions on their basic human rights. Jews were subjected to increasing discrimination and violence and laid the foundation for future anti-sematic measures by legally distinguishing between German and Jew. This led to events like Kristallnacht (the Night of Broken Glass) in 1938, where Jewish businesses, homes, and synagogues were destroyed. These policies escalated during WWII with the establishment of ghettos, concentration camps, and extermination camps, where approximately 6 million Jews + 5 1/2 million others were systematically murdered as part of the Final Solution.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Significance of the Final Solution

A

The “Final Solution” refers to the Nazi regime’s plan for the deliberate and systematic extermination of the Jewish people across Europe. This policy was officially adopted during the Wannsee Conference in January 1942, which lasted 90 minutes. It represented a transition from earlier strategies of oppression and confinement to outright genocide. The significance of the Final Solution lies in its catastrophic outcome: the Holocaust, which resulted in the murder of six million Jews, alongside millions of others whom the Nazis considered to be subhuman. This included Romani individuals, people with disabilities, civilians from Poland and the Soviet Union, and political opponents. This dark period in history serves as a stark warning of the perils of unchecked hatred and the devastating impact of government-endorsed mass murder.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

How was the final solution carried out?

A

The Nazis implemented the Final Solution through a variety of heinous methods. This included mass shootings, gas chambers, forced labor, starvation, and inhumane medical experiments. The Einsatzgruppen, which were mobile death units, carried out mass executions by shooting, especially in the Soviet Union, claiming the lives of hundreds of thousands of Jews and others. Extermination camps utilized gas chambers to execute people with chilling efficiency. Moreover, victims were herded into packed trains and subjected to savage conditions during transportation, resulting in numerous deaths even before reaching the camp

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Impact of the fall of Singapore

A

Singapore’s pivotal role as an Allied stronghold in Southeast Asia was underscored by its strategic location and function as Britain’s main military base. The British defense strategy heavily depended on Singapore to counteract Japanese territorial ambitions. The fall of Singapore represented the loss of a critical logistical and defensive connections and a significant disruption to Allied military activities in the area. Furthermore, Japan’s occupation of Singapore furnished them with a prime staging ground for subsequent operations in Southeast Asia.

The surrender of Singapore in February 1942 dealt a severe blow to the morale and strategic planning of the Allied forces. It stands as one of the gravest defeats in the history of British warfare. This dismantled the long-held belief in British invincibility within Asia and revealed the weaknesses in the Allied defense system. This event compelled the Allies to reevaluate their Pacific strategy, enhancing collaboration among the United States, Britain, and Australia. Additionally, it underscored the necessity to strengthen defenses across the region and was fundamental in the decision to initiate bolder counteroffensive measures against the Japanese military.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Role of the Kamikaze

A

Kamikaze pilots were symbolic of Japan’s last-ditch military efforts during the latter stages of World War II. Engaging in suicide missions, these pilots would intentionally pilot their explosive-laden aircraft into Allied vessels. This approach was deeply rooted in the Bushido code, which honoured self-sacrifice for the emperor and country. While these attacks did manage to damage Allied naval forces and had a demoralizing effect on the sailors, they were not successful in altering the course of the war to benefit Japan. Instead, they showed the extreme measures Japan resorted to as its resources waned.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Importance of the bombing of Pearl Harbour

A

The attack on Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941, marked a pivotal moment in World War II as it triggered the United States’ active involvement in the conflict. Before this assault, the U.S. had adopted a stance of neutrality while still offering material aid to the Allied forces. The surprise attack unified American views and resulted in a swift declaration of war on Japan. Following this, Germany and Italy also declared war on the U.S., thereby fully engaging the United States in the worldwide struggle and considerably enhancing the Allies’ position with America’s industrial and military capabilities.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Bushido code

A

Bushido, the samurai’s ancient code, praised virtues such as honour, loyalty, courage, and self-sacrifice. In World War II, these beliefs were deeply instilled in Japanese soldiers through intensive training and indoctrination, fostering an attitude of absolute devotion to the emperor and the nation. Bushido honoured a death in battle over the disgrace of surrender. This philosophy manifested in the tenacious and sometimes self-destructive strategies of Japanese troops, notably in the deployment of kamikaze pilots. The influence of the Bushido code was a significant factor in the intense and often ruthless nature of warfare in the Pacific, such as the brutal treatment of their prisoners of war through torture, beatings, starvation and murder.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

motivation for the use of the atomic bomb

A

The primary motivations for the United States’ decision to deploy atomic bombs against Japan were to advance the conclusion of World War II and to avoid a potentially devastating invasion of Japan’s mainland. American military leaders projected that such an invasion might lead to hundreds of thousands of Allied casualties and even millions of Japanese casualties. The use of the atomic bomb also served to showcase the formidable might of the U.S. military, particularly as a signal to the Soviet Union. Furthermore, there was an underlying aim to support the considerable investment in the Manhattan Project, which was responsible for developing the atomic weapon. The profound impact of the atomic bomb was anticipated to compel Japan into an unconditional surrender, thereby bringing a definitive end to the conflict.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

For and against the atomic bomb

A

Supporters of the atomic bombs use believe it swiftly concluded World War II, avoiding further loss of life that a drawn-out war or invasion would have caused. It showcased the strength of the US military, possibly preventing future conflicts, especially with the Soviet Union. The bomb’s deployment also justified the Manhattan Project’s costs and exerted decisive pressure that led to Japan’s surrender. Conversely, opponents condemn the bomb for inflicting needless civilian agony and widespread deaths, noting that Hiroshima and Nagasaki held little strategic value. They argue that Japan was nearing surrender, suggesting that a bomb demonstration or a maritime blockade might have ended the war with fewer casualties. Moreover, the bomb’s use has faced ethical condemnation for exposing the world to nuclear war’s terror and establishing a norm for its potential future employment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

short and long term effects of the atomic bomb

A

In the aftermath of the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, immediate fatalities numbered in the tens of thousands, with casualties, including those from radiation, eventually exceeding 200,000. The cities were devastated, turning into ruins with extensive damage to infrastructure. Survivors suffered from severe health complications like burns, radiation sickness, and increased cancer risks. The psychological impact was significant, with many enduring trauma and societal stigma. Long-term effects included sparking the nuclear arms race of the Cold War and initiating enduring moral debates regarding the use of nuclear weapons.

17
Q

Reasons behind the 1967 referendum

A

The 1967 Referendum in Australia marked a pivotal moment aimed at rectifying the exclusion and discrimination faced by Indigenous Australians. Before this referendum, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples were omitted from the national census. The referendum sought constitutional changes to empower the federal government to legislate on behalf of Indigenous people and to ensure their inclusion in the census count. Fueled by Indigenous activism and widespread societal support, the referendum represented a critical move towards social justice and equality, recognizing the rights and contributions of Indigenous Australians and addressing past wrongs.

18
Q

Results of the referendum

A

The 1967 Referendum was met with enormous approval, as more than 90% of Australian voters endorsed the amendments. This outcome granted future administrations the authority to tackle challenges within Indigenous communities and set the stage for progressive developments in Indigenous policies and rights. Moreover, the referendum represented a wider dedication to the principles of equality and social justice across the nation.

19
Q

Significance of the referendum

A

The 1967 Referendum stands as a landmark event for Indigenous Australians, formally recognizing their rights within Australia’s legal and societal structures. It was a significant triumph for Indigenous rights movements and a stride towards enhanced political and societal participation. The referendum’s sweeping approval reflected a national consensus on the urgency of reform and justice for Indigenous groups. Symbolically, it signified a pivotal shift in the dynamics between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians, nurturing a stronger bond and a shared resolve towards reconciliation.

20
Q

Beginnings of the US Civil Rights Movement including Emmet Till’s death

A

The tragic death of Emmett Till in 1955 sent shockwaves through the Civil Rights Movement in the United States. The 14-year-old African American boy’s savage murder in Mississippi, followed by the acquittal of his murderers by a racially biased jury, laid bare the deep-seated racial discrimination and injustice prevalent in the South. Mamie Till-Mobley’s decision to hold an open-casket funeral for her son exposed the brutal reality of racial violence to the world. Her bravery ignited a surge of resolve within the African American community and drew widespread attention to the civil rights cause. Till’s death served as a powerful impetus for civil rights advocacy, inspiring a wave of individuals to join the quest for justice and equality, thereby accelerating the progress towards key civil rights achievements in the years to come.

21
Q

Main events in 1950’s and 1960’s

A

The trio of Emmett Till’s murder, the Montgomery Bus Boycott, and the Little Rock Nine were cornerstone events that shaped the Civil Rights Movement in the 1950s and 1960s. The heinous killing of Emmett Till in 1955, followed by the exoneration of his assailants, cast a national spotlight on the South’s rampant racial brutality, fueling momentum for the movement and underscoring the urgency of comprehensive reform. The Montgomery Bus Boycott of 1955-1956, ignited by Rosa Parks’ detention, demonstrated the impact of organized, peaceful protest, culminating in a Supreme Court decision deeming bus segregation unconstitutional and heralding the ascent of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. as a prominent leader. In 1957, the valiant Little Rock Nine braved hostile crowds to desegregate Central High School, illustrating the obstacles of integration and the necessity of federal enforcement of civil rights statutes. These episodes collectively highlighted the savagery of racial prejudice and the potency of nonviolent demonstration, spurring broad-based activism and leading to pivotal social and legal transformations. Their influence reached far beyond their direct consequences, propelling the drive towards the seminal civil rights laws of the 1960s. Collectively, they represent the trials and triumphs of the Civil Rights Movement in its quest for justice and equality.

22
Q

how the CRM gained momentum

A

The Civil Rights Movement’s escalation was significantly influenced by events such as Emmett Till’s tragic murder and the Montgomery Bus Boycott. These incidents laid bare the harsh truth of racial bigotry and injustice in America, rallying collective support for reform. The barbaric murder of Till put a spotlight on the severe violence endured by African Americans, and the Montgomery Bus Boycott’s success showcased the power of peaceful, organized protest. The extensive media coverage these events received amplified the civil rights cause to a global audience, bolstering public consciousness and backing. The inspirational leadership of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., with his advocacy for nonviolent protest and civil disobedience, motivated many to participate in the movement. These pivotal moments brought together a mosaic of communities and individuals, all committed to the pursuit of justice and equality.

23
Q

Reasoning behind non-violent protest methods

A

There were various reasons for the adoption of non-violent tactics by the Civil Rights Movement. Influenced by Mahatma Gandhi’s nonviolent philosophy, leaders like Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. saw it as a potent tool for enacting social change. Non-violent demonstrations served to starkly contrast the calm resolve of protestors with the aggressive reactions of opponents, winning the hearts and minds of the public. These peaceful methods were employed to expose the cruelty of segregation, avoiding any violent acts that might detract from the movement’s moral standing. The inclusive nature of non-violence allowed individuals of diverse demographics to contribute to the movement. Furthermore, non-violent strategies effectively leveraged economic and political leverage against entities perpetuating segregation and racial injustice.

24
Q

Importance of land right struggles

A

The Mabo and Wik rulings stand as pivotal judgments in the quest for Indigenous land rights in Australia. The 1992 Mabo verdict dismantled the terra nullius doctrine, affirming the longstanding connection of Indigenous Australians to their land, predating European settlement. It recognized native title, granting Indigenous communities the right to assert land claims rooted in their enduring traditions and customs. The 1996 Wik ruling further clarified that native title rights could exist alongside pastoral leases, indicating that Indigenous land claims were not in conflict with the rights of leaseholders. Collectively, these landmark decisions established a legal precedent for Indigenous Australians to reclaim and safeguard their ancestral territories, fostering a path towards equity and reconciliation.

25
Q

Significance of Kevin Rudd’s apology

A

Kevin Rudd’s 2008 apology to the Stolen Generations was a momentous event for multiple reasons. It represented the Australian government’s first formal recognition of the anguish inflicted by the policy of forcibly removing Indigenous children from their families, which had profound and lasting repercussions on Indigenous communities. This apology was a critical step in the reconciliation process, offering validation and solace to those impacted. Furthermore, it underscored the government’s dedication to rectifying historical wrongs and fostering a society that is more inclusive and just. The apology also sparked a wider conversation about the legacy and enduring effects of colonization, enhancing awareness and comprehension among Australians.