Semantic And Syntactic Fallacies (multiple meanings) Flashcards

1
Q

semantic - words with multiple meanings

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Syntactic - rules of acceptable grammar and sentence structure

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Semantic solution - add qualifying words to clarify intended meaning

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Syntactic solution - rearrange words to avoid multiple interpretations

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Language is complex and fluid - meanings evolve and change over time - can lead to misleading meanings in illogical ways

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Vagueness - unable to distinctly define - baldness

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Vagueness - 2 types - degree (baldness) - context (relevant comparison - tall)

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Solution for Vagueness - specify degree (point when change occurs) and context (tall for a 10 year old)

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Equivocation - when 2 different meanings of the same word are fallaciously used within the same argument

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Fallacious amphiboly - same as equivocation - using multiple meanings within argument - difference is equivocation involves words (semantic) and fallacious amphiboly involves meanings within sentences (syntactic) - same principle - mixing meanings within an argument makes an argument doubly fallacious

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly