sem 4 parcial 1 Flashcards
Between the 2 radical poles, social constructivists see themselves as occupying the
middle ground
_____ _____ describes a compromise using the play on words “a stalling between 2 fools”.
Stephen Fry
diferences between realism, liberalism and constructivism
realism: international anarchy is permissive because of the war?, conflict
liberalism: is there an international society?, cooperation
contructivism: anarchy is what states makes of it
In 1989 ______ _______ proposed to call constructivism to those applications that were trying to explain the world under construction that was observed at the end of the Cold War
Nicholas Onuf
is a “social theory of international politics” that emphasizes the social construction of world affairs as opposed to the claim of (neo)realists that international politics is shaped by the rational behavior of egoist actors who pursue their interests to maximize their benefits
constructivism
- German born political scientist
- Solidified social constructivism in 1992 with “Anarchy is what states make of it”
- Socially constructed world
alexander wendt
“Anarchy is what states make of it” by
alexander wendt
Human beings are always situated in particular contexts which
form their actions, they also reproduce, or construct, their world through their actions
Constructivism theory discusses the issue of
anarchy in the international system
key actors of constructivism
states
the differences in the actors between constructivism and others
individuals
recognizes the significance of non-material power as well as material power because the 2 powers connect and interact to build the world order
constructivism
non material powers
influence
culture
education
ideologies
an be understood as a threatening power as well as protecting power for the states
state military power
international politics is not governed purely by power and interests. Norms also matter, like:
- sovereignty
- non intervention
- balance of power
- use and possession of nukes
prefer to speak of an international society rather than an international system
constructivism
key concepts of constructivism
social meanings, identities and beliefs and social norms
The variables of interest to scholars (military power, trade relationships, institutions) are not important because they are objective facts of the world, but rather
social meanings
Constructivism focuses on how ideas, norms, values, and identities and created and constructed, how they develop, and how they change the way states comprehend and react to their situation.
identities and beliefs
A standard of appropriate behavior for actors with a given identity (Katzenstein 1996, 5). States that conform to a certain identity are expected to comply with the norms that are associated with that identity
social norms
constructivism father
alexander wendt
Alexander Wendt proposes that the structures have 3 elements:
- Intersubjective understandings
- Material resources
- practices
is the ability of someone to act, whereas structure refers to the international system that consists of material and ideational elements
agency
States determine the _______ of
international anarchy
nature
Constructivism argues that identities
and interests in international politics are
not stable, they have no pre-given nature.
anarchy is what states
make of it” seems to “build a bridge” between
(neo)realist “truths” and neoliberal/
(neo)idealist “truths.”
constructivism contradicts its own argument
that identities and interests are always in flux by
by making the character of international
anarchy dependent on what states decide to make it, constructivism produces the identity of the state as decision-maker, and this identity cannot be changed.
they have three things in common, Wendt claims that all these theorists agree that
(1) states are the dominant actors in international politics
(2) rationalism is the theoretical disposition through which they explain international
state interactions
3) security is defined in “self-interested” terms
wendt suggests about rationalism
“rationalism offers a fundamentally behavioral conception of both process and
institutions: they change behavior but not identities and interests”
The problem with rationalism, then, is that
it takes the identities and interests of states as given, thereby welcoming questions about changes in state
behavior but not being open to questions about changes in state identities and interests.
Wendt believes he will be able to recover
process among states – processes that may
transform international anarchy from either necessarily conflictual (for (neo)-realists) or cooperative (for neoliberals) into “what states make of it”
according to wendt there are at least two structures that explain state behavior in international politics.
- international anarchy
- “the intersubjectively constituted
structure of identities and interests in the system
are the basis of interests”
identities
are the basis of interests”
identities
is a relatively stable set or ‘structure’ of identities and interests”
institutions
are fundamentally cognitive entities that do not exist apart from actors’ ideas about how the world works”
institutions
was the first to introduce the concept of constructivism into the IR theory debates.
nicholas onuf