Self defence evaluation Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Neccesity to act A01

A

Present and not passed.
D is judged on facts as he believed them too be.
Force can only usually be used when threat is imminent.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Neccesity to act A03 Fair

A

Fair to D as objective test is harsh.
Protects V stops people taking revenge.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Neccesity to act A03 Unfair

A

CJIA does not define so problems as to when it can be used.
Potential for misuse as circumstances don’t have to be reasonable.
Victim may not have done anything.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

D is judged on facts as he believed them too be case

A

Williams

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Reforms for Neccesity to act

A

Belief must be reasonable
Statute definition of ‘imminent’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Common law decisions on Neccesity A01

A

If D is mistaken because he is voluntarily intoxicated can’t use.
D can still use defence even if he has opportunity to retreat and reacted first.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

D is mistaken voluntairly intoxicated case

A

O grady

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Opportunity to retreat and react first case

A

Bird

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Common law decisions on Neccesity A03 Fair

A

Bird is fair shouldnt have to wait to be attacked.
Intoxication rule fair as being drunk is reckless.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Common law decisions on Neccesity A03 Unfair

A

How imminent is unclear
Bird too wide encourage offensive rather than defensive action
Burns contradicts Bird

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Why does burns contradict bird?

A

As he was unable to use the defence due to alternative to force.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Reasonable force A01

A

Force used must be reasonable
D may not at the time be able to ‘weigh to a nicety’
Psychiatric condition not taken into account (Martin)
Householder can’t use grossly disproportionate force.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Who said householder can’t use grossly disproportionate force?

A

S43 Crime and Courts Act

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Who said D may not be able to ‘weigh to a nicety’?

A

CJIA

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Reasonable force A03 Fair

A

Ensure right defence used.
Allows flexibility and reality.
Prevents people going too far.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Ensure right defence used case

A

Oye

17
Q

Allows flexibility and reality case

A

Palmer

18
Q

Reasonable force A03 unfair

A

Difficult for juries to decide issue as little statutory or case law advice
Depends upon gender
Martin only exceptional circumstances however not a lot of cases.

19
Q

What did the 2003 amendment seem to suggest?

A

use more force to protect property than people.

20
Q

All or nothing nature of the defence A01

A

There is no fall back position to lesser offence.
Defence will not be available if force used after danger had passed.
If defence fails judge can take into account circumstances when sentencing.

21
Q

Defence will not be available if force used after danger had passed case

A

Clegg

22
Q

If defence fails judge can take into account circumstances when sentencing.

A

Martin

23
Q

Reforms 1

A

Law continues to offer no defence if act through fear.

24
Q

Reform 2

A

More clarification needed regarding proportionate force

25
Q

Reform 3

A

More clarification needed regarding ‘grossly disproportionate force’

26
Q

Reform 4

A

Allow a fall back lesser offence so no longer All or nothing