Self Defence Flashcards
Formula to negate criminal liability
Actus Reus + Mens Rea + Defence
When is (would be) criminal conduct defensible?
- Justified Conduct
- Exempted Conduct
- Excused Conduct
Justified Conduct
The defendant is acquitted because what would otherwise be a crime is justified in the circumstances (e.g. self defence)
Exempted Conduct
The defendant is acquitted because at the time of committing the relevant act he/she is exempted (e.g. a child)
Excused Conduct
Conduct is not justified, or exempted but it can be excused (e.g. duress)
Sources of ‘self defence’ law
- Common law defence of the person
- Criminal Damage Act 1971 - defence of property
- Criminal Law Act 1967 - arrest and crime prevention
New-labour and the consolidation of self-defence law - Householder cases
What are the 2 limbs for self defence?
- Limb 1: The trigger
- Limb 2: The response
The trigger
- Belief in the need to use force (genuine)
The response
- The amount of force used
CJIA 2008: the requirements for ‘reasonable force’
- 76(3): ‘…reasonableness to be decided by reference to the circumstances as D believed them to be…’
- 76(4): If D genuinely held the belief that the use of force was reasonable then he can rely on this even if mistaken (unless under voluntary induced intoxication: 76(5))
- 76(6): ‘…degree of force used by D is not to be regarded as having been reasonable in the circumstances as D believed them to be if it was disproportionate in those circumstances.’
A ‘Householder case’ is where…
- (a)the defence concerned is the common law defence of self-defence,
- (b)the force concerned is force used by D while in or partly in a building, or part of a building, that is a dwelling or is forces accommodation (or is both),
- (c)D is not a trespasser at the time the force is used, and
- (d)at that time D believed V to be in, or entering, the building or part as a trespasser.
S.76 (5a) CJIA 2008: In a householder case…
the degree of force used by D is not to be regarded as having been reasonable in the circumstances as D believed them to be if it was grossly disproportionate in those circumstances