Self Defence Flashcards

1
Q

Formula to negate criminal liability

A

Actus Reus + Mens Rea + Defence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

When is (would be) criminal conduct defensible?

A
  • Justified Conduct
  • Exempted Conduct
  • Excused Conduct
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Justified Conduct

A

The defendant is acquitted because what would otherwise be a crime is justified in the circumstances (e.g. self defence)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Exempted Conduct

A

The defendant is acquitted because at the time of committing the relevant act he/she is exempted (e.g. a child)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Excused Conduct

A

Conduct is not justified, or exempted but it can be excused (e.g. duress)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Sources of ‘self defence’ law

A
  • Common law defence of the person
  • Criminal Damage Act 1971 - defence of property
  • Criminal Law Act 1967 - arrest and crime prevention
    New-labour and the consolidation of self-defence law
  • Householder cases
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are the 2 limbs for self defence?

A
  • Limb 1: The trigger
  • Limb 2: The response
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

The trigger

A
  • Belief in the need to use force (genuine)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

The response

A
  • The amount of force used
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

CJIA 2008: the requirements for ‘reasonable force’

A
  • 76(3): ‘…reasonableness to be decided by reference to the circumstances as D believed them to be…’
  • 76(4): If D genuinely held the belief that the use of force was reasonable then he can rely on this even if mistaken (unless under voluntary induced intoxication: 76(5))
  • 76(6): ‘…degree of force used by D is not to be regarded as having been reasonable in the circumstances as D believed them to be if it was disproportionate in those circumstances.’
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

A ‘Householder case’ is where…

A
  • (a)the defence concerned is the common law defence of self-defence,
  • (b)the force concerned is force used by D while in or partly in a building, or part of a building, that is a dwelling or is forces accommodation (or is both),
  • (c)D is not a trespasser at the time the force is used, and
  • (d)at that time D believed V to be in, or entering, the building or part as a trespasser.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

S.76 (5a) CJIA 2008: In a householder case…

A

the degree of force used by D is not to be regarded as having been reasonable in the circumstances as D believed them to be if it was grossly disproportionate in those circumstances

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly