Fraud cases Flashcards

1
Q

R v Barnard

A
  • (1837)
  • Representation by words, gestures or conduct
  • Defendant dressed as a student, constituted an implied deception. Students at Oxford Uni were allowed discounts at a shop.
  • Charged with a deception offence and held that his dress implied a deception, whether he said anything or not
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Idrees v DPP

A
  • [2011]
  • Directly or through an agent
  • Wanted to pass driving theory test and gave his friend his licence, and the staff recognised the friend and charged Idrees
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

DPP v Ray

A
  • [1974]
  • The defendant ate a meal at a chinese restaurant and left without paying
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Government of the United Arab Emirates v Allen

A
  • [2012]
  • took out a loan and deposited an undated check, spent all the money in the bank account. Test of reasonableness and 20 year term was long
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Cornelius

A
  • [2012]
  • Conveyancing solicitor and was dishonest, but when looking through documents couldn’t find anything wrong.
  • Acting on 8 different transactions, and did not disclose that he had take money from borrowers
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Jeevarajah

A
  • [2012]
  • One week a man had won the lottery, and the workers didn’t tell him to claim for lottery for themselves
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Ivey v Genting Casinos UK Ltd (t/a Crockfords Club)

A
  • [2017]
  • Won a huge sum of money cheating at a casino. Redefined the test, so now the jury has to consider what the defendant’s knowledge was, and test it against ordinary people
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly