Self Defence Flashcards
Self Defence Basic Facts
-Complete defence, defendant not guilty if successful
-Common law of self defence is amended by the Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008
What questions are asked when deciding if self defence was lawful ?
-Was it necessary to use force?, Subjective Test
-Was the force used Reasonable?, Objective Test
Was it necessary to use force ?
-Defendant will be judged according to the facts he or she genuinely believed them to be (a subjective test)
S 76 of Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008
-Shows that under subsection 3, if a person had mistaken the facts but had a genuine belief as to the facts they had mistaken, they can be judged on those facts they believed
-R v Williams
Mental Conditions
-Defendants genuine belief can include delusions resulting from a psychiatric condition
-Shown in R v Press and Thompson
Pre-emptive strikes
-Depends on the fact of the case
-Considered in R v Bird
-If a person could’ve retreated will be considered however
If the defendant is the aggressor
-even if the defendant is firstly the aggressor, if the force of victims response is wholly disproportionate and extreme, they may still use the defence of Self defence
-Seen in R v Rashford
Was the force used reasonable
-Rule is set out in S 76(6) of Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008
-Says that apart from householder cases, force which is disproportionate will not be reasonable.
-Test is set out in R v Oye and R v Press and Thompson
-Test balances the risk of harm to the defendant with the risk of harm to the victim
-Initially proportionate force may turn into disproportionate force
-Defence is lost entirely when the force is disproportionate
-Seen in R v Clegg and R v Martin
What must be present for it to be a Householder case
To be a householder case:
-The force must be used by the defendant while in or partly in a building that is a dwelling
-The defendant must not be a trespasser
-The defendant must have believed that the victim was a trespasser
Test for Householder cases
-Set out in R v Ray
-Questions asked are:
- Was the force the defendant used grossly disproportiante in the circumstances as they believed them to be, if no then:
2.Was the degree of force the defendant used nevertheless reasonable in the circumstances they believed them to be, if reasonable they have a defence