Self-Defence Flashcards
What is self defence, where is it found?
s76 Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008
using force believed to have been necessary in them circumstances for self protection, protection of another or in prevention of another crime.
What are the 3 key situations to consider?
CJIA 2008
a) in self defence
b) defence of another
s3. 1 CLA 1967
c) prevention of a crime
what is the law on force in self-defence?
- used what thought was reasonable (Dewar v DPP)
- Judged on facts which they believed them to be at the time (R v Gladstone-Williams)
- Reasonable/proportinate in the circumstance (Palmer)
- cannot be after the attack (R v Hussain)
Dewar v DPP
did what he thought was necessary at the time
even though they regretted it later
R v Gladstone-Williams
Judged on the facts that they believed at the time - for mistake use of force
Palmer
Must be wholly disproportionate,
but considers that individuals cannot always accurately calculate force
R v Hussain
Burglary was over when D attacked
Force can’t be used AFTER the attack, this is unreasonable force
What are the rules on householder cases?
s43 Crime and Courts Act (2013) - establishes wider offence
- degree of force is reasonable unless grossly disporoportinate
KEY CASE - Collins v Secretary of State for Justice
What is a Householder case, which case establishes this?
Collins v Security of State for Justice
a) D wasn’t a tresspasser
b) believed Was a tresspasser
c) force was used in/partly in a building which is a dwelling
Force reasonableness=Jury Decision
Rule on pre-emptive strike?
D attacks first:
is allowed, if there is a clear risk of being subjected to some harm
R v Bird // R v Deana
R v Bird // R v Deana
pre-emptive strike = allowed for self-defence
Rule on drunken mistakes?
mistakes made due to voluntary intoxication is not allowed as this is reckless conduct
O’Grady
O’Grady
drunken mistakes caused by voluntary intoxication as this is reckless conduct
What if the Defendant was the aggressor?
If D was the aggressor and started the initial confrontation - cannot argue self-defence
R v Rashford
R v Rashford
If D was the aggressor and started the initial confrontation - cannot argue self-defence