Section 8: Environmental Targets Flashcards
The Marginal Damage Cost (MDC) depicts the relationship between ____ and the ____ caused to society
quantity of pollutant and the damage
Name the 2 ways we measure the quantity of pollutant
- Emissions (in tons)
2. Concentration (in ppm)
Why does the MDC slope upwards?
As we emit more of the pollutant, more damages are caused to society by that pollutant
What factors influence the shape of the marginal damage cost curve?
- Cultural values in the region
- Type of pollutant
- Assimilative capacity of pollutant
- Number of people affected
What is the marginal abatement cost (MAC) and why does it slope downwards?
The cost to abate the next unit of emissions
It slopes downward because the more pollutant we emit, the less it costs to abate those emissions
The total MAC is the ____ sum of MACs across agents
Horizontal
Name a few ways to reduce emissions
- Reduce production
- Change inputs (different fuels)
- Altering production technology (that is more efficient)
- Treating emissions (scrubbing or sequestering)
- Changing source location (move to rural area)
Where does “optimal pollution” occur? Why is this amount of emissions optimal?
When the MDC intersects the MAC. This is efficient because there is no dead-weight loss
What are the 4 limitations of “optimal” pollution analysis
- Uncertainty in MDC and MAC curves
- Assumes weak sustainability
- Ignores distribution of costs and benefits (equity)
- Ignores the marginal utility of money (different incomes)
Name 3 alternatives to the optimal pollution model
- Show MAC and MDC with uncertainty (upper bound and lower bound)
- Set a safe minimum standard (SMS) (e.g. Less than 2 degrees of warming from GHGs)
- Set targets between whats unaffordable and the safe minimum standard
What is the second equimarginal principle? Where on the graph is abatement cost minimized?
The marginal cost of the last unit abated is the same for all regulated agents
The intersection of the 2 MACs
Why is the second equimarginal principle important?
Since firms have different MAC functions, enforcing the same pollution levels can result in a dead-weight loss
If a firm has abated to optimal pollution levels, what change would incentivize them to abate even further
Increased MDC or decreased MAC