Section 5. The Nature Of Law Flashcards
What are the two main theories relating to the nature of law?
- Legal positivism
- Natural law
What is legal positivism?
The theory of law that is based on the idea that laws are valid where they are made by the recognised legislative power in the state and do not have to satisfy any higher authority
What was legal philosopher Jeremy Bentham’s views and actions relating to legal positivism?
- He was a utilitarian who wrote about what the law is, and a commentary on its merits or otherwise
- He believed that the philosophy of law should be concerned purely with what law is
What was legal philosopher John Austin’s views and actions relating to legal positivism?
Developed the command theory of law with its three main principles
What was legal philosopher Prof. H.L.A. Hart’s views and actions relating to legal positivism?
- He’s a legal positivist who believes in the separation of law and morality
- He argues that there are two categories of rules, primary and secondary
- These combine to form the basis of a workable legal system
What was legal philosopher Joseph Raz’s views and actions relating to legal positivism?
- He’s a legal positivist who argues that the identity and existence of a legal system may be tested by reference to three elements
- Law is autonomous - we can identify its content without resource to morality
What was legal philosopher Hans Kelsen’s views and actions relating to legal positivism?
- He’s a legal positivist who argues that morality is no part of law
How do natural lawyers differ from legal positivists?
- They reject legal positivism
- They believe that the validity of man-made laws depends upon the laws being compatible with a higher, moral authority
- Where laws don’t satisfy the requirements of this higher moral authority, the laws lack validity
What is natural law?
A moral theory of jurisprudence, which maintains that law should be based on morality and ethics
What was Thomas Aquinas’s view on natural law?
- Combined the philosophy of Aristotle with Christian theology, including the Bible and the Ten Commandments, and Catholic Church tradition
- He sets out four kinds of law
What was Lon Fuller’s view on natural law?
- Argued that law serves the purpose: ‘to achieve social order through subjecting peoples conduct to the guidance of general rules by which they may themselves orient their behaviour’
- If law is to achieve this purpose, it must satisfy eight principles which make up an inner morality of law
What is law?
Rules, some are legally enforceable, such as English law, a body of rules supported by sanctions administered by the state
What is a Rule?
Has been defined by Twining and Miers in How to Do Things with Rules (2014) as ‘a general norm mandating or guiding conduct’
What are the rules that are not based on law or morality (often referred to as laws)?
- E.g. The laws of football or the laws of chess
- They’re generally observed in the context in which they operate
- If these laws are broken, there’re sanctions in the context of the sport
- Many would view any form of cheating in a sport or game as wrong and possibly as immoral
What’s the idea on laws relating to the operation of physics and universe?
- Laws of physics or the universe - not in laws in the legal sense, just facts
- E.g. the three laws of thermodynamics
- They are immutable (they’re unchanging and cannot be broken)
What is morality?
- Defined as a system of values and conduct held by either a specific person or a society
- Originally defined by religious codes
What did sociologist Emile Durkheim say on moral values?
- Moral values change over time and according to Durkheim, owing to the increasing specialisation of labour, growing ethnic diversity and the fading influence of religion, it is nor harder to find a common morality in Britain
- Therefore, individual moral codes may now be more obviously different from those of society as a whole
What are the headings used to compare legal rules and moral rules?
- Their origins
- Their date of commencement
- Their enforcement
- Their ease of change
- Their certainty of content
- The way the rules are applied
Where did legal rules originate from?
They originate in common and statute law, conventions and EU law
Where did moral rules originate from?
Originated in Christian teachings in the Bible but are now more likely to originate from a combination of upbringing, education, peer views or one’s own conscience
What is legal rules date of commencement?
- They will generally have a start date, either an Act of Parliament or precedent in a court case.
- E.g. R v R (1991) would have had retrospective effect because that decision meant women who had been raped by the their husbands before that decision could now pursue them
What is moral rules date of commencement?
They cannot be pinpointed with a specific start date, but rather evolve over time
How are legal rules enforced?
They’re enforced by sanction in the courts
How are moral rules enforced?
- They’re harder to enforce, although somebody using rude language e.g. might be barred from somewhere like a sports or social club
- The enforcement of moral rules usually comes in the way of public disapproval
How easy is the change of legal and moral rules?
- Legal rules are relatively easy to change, it is hard to impose a change on moral rules
- Moral rules will usually change over time and the law will follow these changes, e.g. same-sex marriage
- Sometimes it works the other way round, e.g. decriminalisation of homosexuality in 1967-after which attitudes continued to remain largely hostile till at least the 1990s
How certain of content are legal and moral rules?
They’re usually quite certain in the words of a statute or judgement, whereas the content of moral rules can sometimes only be discovered through the exposure to them, such as in the home
Who are legal and moral rules applied to?
Legal rules apply to everybody, whereas some moral rules are accepted almost universally (e.g. cheating on a spouse) and others to some groups of people (disapproval of abortion)
What is a pluralist society?
One in which minority groups maintain their independent cultural traditions and all members are expected to tolerate each other’s beliefs even if they don’t agree with them
What occurs in a society when its multicultural and pluralist?
There will be some moral values where all share a collective view and others that relate to certain groups
What protects individuals views?
The European Convention on Human Rights
What moral values are possible for punishment by the state even though tenure protected by the ECHR?
Conscientious objection, when a member of the military removes himself from his duties on moral grounds - R v Lyons (2011)
How the European Court of human rights acted on Pluralism?
Owing to the fact that in some countries, religious fundamentals have managed to impose their moral values on the law, in pluralist Europe there is a resistance to this
What occurred in Open Door Counselling and Dublin Woman Well Centre v Ireland (1992)?
The European Court of Human Rights held that the Irish Supreme Court’s injunction restraining counselling agencies from providing pregnant women with information on abortion services violated Art.10 ECHR (Right to freedom of expression)
Does the moral views of society evolve over time?
- Yes, Moral view in society are evolving over time and the law usually, eventually follows suit: child protection, euthanasia/assisted dying, death penalty, same sex marriage, LGBT issues, equality of pay and the legislation of drugs.
- Sometimes attitudes change more slowly on these issues
How are the issues of the LGBT an example of the moral views in society changing over time?
- 1967 - Decriminalisation of homosexual activity in certain circumstances
- 2001 - Equalisation of the age of consent
- 2003 - Further repeal of certain other sexual offences
- 2004 - Civil partnership
- 2004 - Gender Recognition Act
- 2013 - Same sex marriage legalised
- 2017 - Posthumous pardon for men convicted of homosexual offences before 1967 - Alan Turing’s law
What is the difficulty in striking a balance between the moral views of the majority and the rights of minorities
Its deciding when the greater good of society as a whole should prevent the individuals views from being unacceptable
What is the relationship between law and morality?
- Legal rules and moral rules often overlap. When they do, legal rules are strengthened as their enforcement can be more readily justified
- However some legal rules don’t seem to have any moral justification
What is a ‘permissive society’?
- Arose following changing moral standards and led to significant changes in the law e.g. in the relaxation of censorship of publications that were formerly considered ‘obscene’.
- Developed in the 1960s when there was a lot of development to the law e.g. abortion act, etc.
What characteristics do legal and moral rules share?
- They are both concerned with setting standards
- They both dictate the way in which people are expected to behave
- They employ similar language: they distinguish between right and wrong, and they speak of duties, obligations and responsibilities
- Legal rules are strengthened when they’re the same as moral rules, and their enforcement can more readily be justified and is accepted by society
What can changing moral values lead to?
- Developments in the law
- Can be seen in the historical development of the law relating to rape within marriage
- In this way, the law eventually caught up with perceived public morality
What’re the two starting points of the debate on the question of ‘whether, and to what extent, the law should seek to enforce any particular moral views’?
- The law should act as the guardian of public morals and intervene to ensure the continuation of a dominant morality within the state
- Or, that individuals should be left free to decide their own morality
Who was John Stuart Mill?
- Writer of ‘On liberty’
- 19th century liberal philosopher
What was J S Mill’s approach on the question of ‘whether, and to what extent, the law should seek to enforce any particular moral views’?
- ‘Harm principle’ theory - that individuals should be free to harm themselves, if thats what they want to do, but that society should only stop them if they wish to harm others
- Doesn’t apply to children as they are more vulnerable
- The idea that individuals should be free to do what they like. If harm is done however, it should not outweigh the harm denying individual liberty
Who was J S Mill’s approach opposed by and why?
- Opposed by the judge, Sir James Stephen
- Because there’s no distinction between acts that harm others and acts that harm yourself. Some acts are so grossly wicked
What were the problems with J S Mill’s approach?
- It is not clear what constitutes ‘harm’, physical or otherwise; does it include e.g. porn, drug-taking, etc.
- Not clear whether an embryo or a foetus falls within the definition of other members of society
- Some of the laws implemented relating to victimless crimes produce secondary crime, and all create new criminals, many of whom are otherside law-abiding citizens and people in authority
What is Professor Harts side of the Hart-Devlin debate?
- The law has a role in preserving public order and decency but should not intervene in the private life of citizens
- Moral standards should only be enforced according to Hart, when they are creating a genuine public nuisance
What is Lord Patrick Devlin side of the Hart-Devlin debate?
- Law Lord in the 1950s/60s
- Book, ‘Enforcement of morals’ - “without shared ideas on politics, morals and ethics, no society can exist”
- Whilst personal preferences, likes and dislikes shouldn’t form the basis for decisions about moral conduct, there should be an objective test to see where boundaries should be drawn
- This is the immoral conduct that should be prohibited by law
What are the issues reflecting the Hart-Devlin debate and the relationship between law and morality?
- Judges and Parliament are often forced to confront complex moral issues. Parliament can choose whether to legislate but judges have no choice
- Judges often have to confront ‘new’ issues affecting public morality e.g. Shaw v DPP (1962)
- The overlap with criminal law, morality and human rights e.g. R v G (2008)
- In recent times, the courts have produced conflicting views on the relationship between law and morality e.g. Otkritie International Investment Management Ltd v Urumov (2013)
- Situation is conflicted and whether one talks of ‘morals’ or ‘values’, judges have to apply themselves to real cases with real facts and real people and reflect the situation as they perceive it as to any moral or values issues
What does justice mean?
It is a concept that can be described simply by a synonym such as fairness, equality or even-handedness
What’re the 3 types of justice?
- Substantive justice
- Procedural justice
- Distributive justice
What is Substantive justice?
How the rules work in various aspects of law, criminal, tort etc.
What is Procedural justice?
- The idea of fairness in the processes that resolve disputes and allocate resources
- One aspect of procedural justice is related to discussions of the administration of justice and legal proceedings
What is Distributive justice?
- Concerned with the fair allocation of resources among different areas of society
- Can be seen through the law on equal pay and minimum wages, taxation and the benefits system and more
What is corrective justice?
When the law restores the imbalance that has occurred between two individuals or an individual and the state