Section 47 ABH Flashcards

1
Q

What is the definition of Actus Reus in the context of Section 47 of the Offences Against the Person Act 1861?

A

An assault or a battery causing actual bodily harm.

Actual bodily harm is defined as any hurt or injury calculated to interfere with the health or comfort of the victim.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

How was actual bodily harm defined in the case of Miller?

A

As ‘any hurt or injury calculated to interfere with the health or comfort of the victim’.

Examples include bruises, scratches, swelling, mild concussion, momentary loss of consciousness, chest pain, cutting of hair, and psychiatric harm exceeding mere fear or distress.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What was the outcome in the case of Chan Fook?

A

The injuries were enough for ABH, but the fear and panic were not.

The victim suffered a fractured wrist and a dislocated hip after attempting to escape.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What does the case of Smith illustrate regarding actual bodily harm?

A

A man cut off his girlfriend’s ponytail after an argument, resulting in a conviction under Section 47.

This case highlights that even minor physical actions can constitute actual bodily harm.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What significant point was established in T v DPP regarding actual bodily harm?

A

Momentary loss of consciousness was enough to constitute actual bodily harm.

The victim was kicked in the head and remembered nothing until waking up by a policeman.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

In Burstow, what type of harm was recognized as actual bodily harm?

A

Psychiatric harm could be classed as actual bodily harm, and even grievous bodily harm.

The victim suffered severe depression due to prolonged harassment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What must be satisfied for an assault or battery to be considered the cause of actual bodily harm?

A

The rules on causation must be satisfied.

This means both factual and legal causation must be established.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is the definition of Mens Rea in the context of Section 47?

A

Intention or subjective recklessness as to an assault or a battery, not as to the actual bodily harm itself.

This distinguishes the mental state required for the act from the outcome.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is direct (specific) intention as defined in Mohan?

A

Where the defendant makes a decision to bring about a particular consequence, i.e., an assault or battery.

This refers to the conscious choice to perform the act.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

How is subjective recklessness defined in Cunningham?

A

Where the defendant foresees a risk of a consequence, i.e., an assault or battery, and carries on regardless.

This indicates a disregard for the potential harm that may result from the action.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What was the key finding in the case of Roberts regarding Mens Rea?

A

The defendant had the mens rea for battery as he intended the application of unlawful force, which was sufficient for the mens rea of Section 47.

This occurred when the victim jumped out of the car to escape unwanted advances.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What does the case of Savage illustrate about Mens Rea?

A

The woman had the mens rea for battery as she intended the application of unlawful force, sufficient for the mens rea of Section 47.

This happened when she accidentally caused injury while throwing beer.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly