Assault Flashcards

1
Q

What is the definition of assault under common law?

A

An intentional or reckless act which causes a person to apprehend (fear) the infliction of immediate unlawful force.

Charged under Section 39 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the Actus Reus of assault?

A

An act causing the apprehension (fear) of the infliction of immediate unlawful force.

There must be fear, but no need for physical injury.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

True or False: The act of assault can only be physical.

A

False

The act can be a gesture, words, or even silent phone calls.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What case clarified common assault as causing someone to apprehend being struck?

A

Nelson

In 2013, it was clarified that a physical act causing apprehension constitutes common assault.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Which case involved pointing a toy gun at a victim as an assault?

A

Logdon

The victim was scared because they thought it was a real gun.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

In Tuberville v Savage, why was there no assault despite the man’s threatening gesture?

A

The words negated it, indicating there would be no violence.

The context of ‘assize time’ contributed to this ruling.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What was significant about the case of Constanza regarding assault?

A

Letters could be considered an assault.

The defendant wrote 800 ‘stalking’ letters to the victim.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What ruling was made in Ireland/Burstow regarding silent phone calls?

A

Silent phone calls can be considered an assault.

This expands the definition of actions that can cause fear.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

How was ‘immediate’ defined in Smith v Woking Police?

A

‘Immediate’ was defined flexibly as ‘some time not excluding the immediate future’.

This case involved a man staring through a victim’s window.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What does Mens Rea refer to in the context of assault?

A

Intention or subjective recklessness as to causing someone the apprehension of immediate unlawful force.

Intention can be direct or specific.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is subjective recklessness as defined in Cunningham?

A

Where the defendant foresees a risk of a consequence (fear) and carries on regardless.

This is a key component of Mens Rea.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What was the outcome of the case Venna regarding recklessness?

A

Recklessness was enough to commit the offences of assault, battery, and ABH.

This involved a disturbance where a police officer was injured.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Fill in the blank: The act causing fear in assault can be a _______.

A

[gesture or words or silent phone calls].

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly