Section 2.3 Flashcards

1
Q

Describe the limitations that guaranty funds may have on reimbursements to policyholders

A

LOB exclusions: [Hint: C-STORM]
* Credit, Surplus lines, Title, Ocean marine, Reinsurance, Mortgage

claims payouts and UEP refund: have stated limits (except claims payouts for WC - WC has no limit)

deductibles:
* claim deductible
* policy deductible
* large net worth deductible (a percentage of an insured’s net worth)

trigger is required:
court must verify insolvency and have placed insurer in receivership

From problem
 Unearned premium may not be fully recouped
 Claim limit
 Claim deductible
 Large net worth deductible
 Means test/restrictions
 Surplus lines don’t qualify
 Risk retention groups don’t qualify
 May be delay in payments
 Trigger of coverage, coverage only begins after a court declares the insurer insolvent
 Fund may be exhausted because there is a finite limit (2% of written premium) that can be assessed per a year

Porter Reg

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

How to calculate an insurer assessment (in event of other state insurer insolvency)?

A

The other item concerns insurer assessments. If

L = insurer liabilities eligible for recovery after insolvency
NWPA = NWP of insurer A (one of the remaining solvent insurers in state)
NWPtotal = total NWP of remaining solvent insurers in state
then:

Formula: assessmentA = L x NWPA / NWPtotal

Porter Reg

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Fully describe the process used by guaranty funds to assess insurers

A

Post-Solvency Assessment:
* Regulator determines the amount of funds needed
* Regulator charges assessment to remaining insurers based on market share
* Assessments are capped at a % of WP and can recur for multiple years

Porter Reg

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What would be advantages/disadvantages of having the guaranty fund pre-funded (perhaps a yearly payment from all insurers of 1-2% of premium)?

A

Advantages:
* The funds would be ready when an insolvency happens if they are prefunded (quicker relief for policyholders)
* The fund can earn investment income on the assessments collected over time, lowering
the amount required from insurers
* The pre-funding method would guarantee the fund is funded at all times
* Increase speed of claim payment when insolvency occurs
* Less admin cost after insolvency
* Increased protection for policyholders since a reserve can be built up
* Less disruptive than large assessment after insolvency
* Insurers can anticipate cost upfront and plan accordingly
* State can invest the funds and earn investment income
* Future insolvent insurers also contribute to the fund, which may be more fair
Disadvantages:
* Prefunding can incur expenses for insurers for a fund that might not even be used, which would increase costs that trickle down to policyholders through rates
* Determining the actual percent of written premium would be difficult (fund may end upover/under-funded)
* The pre-funding amount is factored into pricing and hence more expensive for policyholders
* Insurers cannot invest the funds collected by the guarantee fund
* The small percentage of WP may not be enough when an insolvency occurs
* Difficult to estimate the appropriate percentage ahead of the time
* With the backdrop, consumers may be indifferent in choosing insurers – this may hurt the insurers with strong financial rating and underwriting
* If the assessment is based on total WP, it may be unfair since only certain LOBs are covered by Guaranty Funds
* WP is not always correlated with risk & exposure; Companies with different risk levels
may be assessed the same %
* May not have insolvency for a long time so pre-funding may be inefficient
* May be a burden for insurers at the verge of insolvency; The additional financial burden could lead to more insolvencies
* The additional costs in pre-funding states may cause insurers to focus more on growing in other states and at the extreme level, stop writing business in pre-funding states
* Large (stable) insurers may be subsidizing the smaller insurers which may be more likely to go insolvent

Porter Reg

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Describe how a guaranty fund provides services to policyholders

A
  • Handles claims of insolvent insurer OR Pays claims and returns unearned premium of insolvent insurer
  • Provides temporary coverage in case of insolvency

Porter Reg

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Explain why insurers are prohibited from using information about guaranty funds in marketing materials

A
  • Guaranty fund has limited coverage OR policyholder may not be fully indemnified
  • Moral hazard OR distorting competition OR existence of guaranty fund does not prove
    financial strength OR insurer grows irresponsibly OR policyholders would be less likely to
    seek a financially strong insurer

Porter Reg

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Identify characteristics of the business of insurance

A
  • SPECIFIC to insurance industry
  • SPREADS risk (or transfers risk)
  • CONTRACT between insurer & insured

Porter Fed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Give some examples of federal regulation

A

1933: Securities Act (disclosure & reporting requirements for publicly traded companies, see also the wikipedia article Securities Act of 1933)
1968: National Flood Insurance Act (discussed further in the wiki article Horn.Flood in the subsection Intro to NFIP)
1981: Risk Retention Act (discussed further in the wiki article GAO.Report in the subsection Intro to Risk Retention Groups)

Porter Fed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Identify Complicating Factors in Rate Regulation for Regulators

A

complicating factors in rate regulation:
- costs are not known at time of purchase
(must be estimated)
- must balance solvency and affordability considerations
- complexity of rating plans
(difficult for regulator to form a systematic approach across companies)

Porter Fed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What act established the Federal Insurance Office?

A

Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act

Porter Fed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is the National Association of Insurance Commissioners?

A

The NAIC is the U.S. standard-setting and regulatory support organization…
- created & governed by the chief insurance regulators
- from the 50 states, the District of Columbia and five U.S. territories.

Porter State

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What does the NAIC do?

A

fundamental goals:
- promote public interest (including fair & equitable treatment of consumers)
- promote insurer solvency
- promote state insurance regulation

types of regulatory assistance provided by the NAIC:
- Develop uniform financial reporting standards
- Assist states with pricing/coverage
- Maintain databases to track solvency

Porter State

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Identify the mission of the NAIC Accreditation program

A

maintain standards for solvency regulation

NAIC-Accreditation is voluntary but all states have gone through the accreditation process anyway.

One of the big advantages to being accredited, both to regulators and insurers, is that regulations are more likely to be uniform across states.

Remember that the McCarran-Ferguson Act of 1945 essentially preserved state regulation, with certain exceptions, but without NAIC oversight states could have wildly different regulatory systems. Note that NAIC oversight is different from federal regulation. Recall that the NAIC is a support organization consisting of state regulators (and D.C. and U.S. territories) whereas federal regulation would involve the passage of laws by Congress.

Porter State

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Describe the NAIC Accreditation program for states

A

Interview:
- personnel from state insurance department

Review:
- state laws
- prior examination reports
- files on selected state insurers
- operations of state insurance department

Understand:
- communications within state insurance department

Discuss:
- findings

Report:
- findings

Porter State

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What are some typical features of a state insurance regulatory system?

A

A state system typically has requirements for insurers regarding:
- licensing
- reporting & filing

A state system typically has authority to:
- conduct periodic exams
- impose sanctions

Porter State

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Identify goals of insurer regulation

A
  • promote public interest (includes fair & equitable treatment of consumers)
  • promote insurer solvency
  • promote competitive markets
  • promote availability of coverage

Porter State

17
Q

Describe initiatives to improve state-based insurance regulation

A

==> improve RBC calculation
* doesn’t currently include operational risk, catastrophe risk, interest rate risk
* RBC now includes these 3 risks ← shout-out to downthesun!
==> review IFRS accounting standards:
* using IFRS would improve uniformity in global insurance market
==> encourage ORSA: ( Own Risk Solvency Assessment)
* insurers self-assess and provide insight to regulators

Porter State

18
Q

Argue for and against the statement:

“The financial crisis of 2007-2008 demonstrated that insurance should be regulated at the federal level”

A

For
* Need one national voice in dealing with global insurance topics
* Since insurance is a critical element of society, federal regulation would help avoid a
massive insurer failure
* A single authority would allow ease of monitoring so that business transactions in all states

Against
* Insurance companies were the least hit by the crisis, which showed that current rules and
regulations at the state level are effective in keeping insurance companies afloat and
ongoing
* Duplication, peer review, and diversity of opinions among state regulators more likely to
catch failing companies
* The low amount of problems in state-regulated insurers relative to federally-regulated
banks shows that state regulation is an effective process

Porter State

19
Q

Describe options available to non-domiciliary regulators to assess insurer’s financial strength

A
  • Other regulators can order examinations on their own (single-state effort, multi-state
    effort that doesn’t involve the NAIC. Outside regulator could also pressure domestic
    regulator to take action.
  • -Can review public financial statements to calculate IRIS ratios and RBC ratios, as well as
    review income statement and balance sheet to help determine if the insurer is troubled.
    -Check rating from financial rating agency. Has it changed during the last several years?
  • -The outside regulator may conduct its own review; the insurer is subject to regulation by
    any state in which it operates, regardless of whether the insurer is a foreign, domestic, or
    alien operator.
    -If the company is a nationally significant insurer, then the outside regulator could rely on
    findings from the review by the NAIC’s Financial Analysis Division.
  • -Pressure the domiciliary regulator to examine the company
    -Examine the company themselves
  • -Non-domiciliary states are required to license insurers in their state and may assess an
    insurer’s financial position when it applies for a license
  • -They could do their own financial exam to evaluate solvency.
    -They could use NAIC’s monitoring and assessment tools and possibly ask the NAIC for help
    (e.g. refer the insurer to FAWG if it has not already been caught through the FAD’s periodic
    analysis as being of concern.)

Porter State

20
Q

Define ‘model law’ as used by the NAIC

A
  • a law developed by the NAIC which is suggested for use in all states
  • states can adopt, decline, or modify the law

Porter State

21
Q

Why might a state regulator SUPPORT adoption of a NAIC model law?

A

efficiency:
- research & drafting of law has been done (no need for states to redo this work)

uniformity:
- if adopted by all states, it’s easier for each state to regulate multi-state insurers

Porter State

22
Q

Describe ways insurers BENEFIT from model laws

A
  • NAIC model laws provide uniformity across states
  • less expensive for multi-state insurers to enter market and comply with regulations

Porter State

23
Q

Describe reasons for a state to MODIFY a particular model law

A
  • to meet unique needs of state
  • to coordinate with existing laws of state

Porter State

24
Q

Why might a state regulator OPPOSE adoption of a NAIC model law?

A

redundancy:
- similar state laws may already exist

irrelevancy:
- model may not address unique needs of state

Porter State

25
Q

What does the state DOI do?

A

Group 1: licensing & regulation
- licensing of insurers (for insurers doing business in their state)
- licensing of producers (sellers may have to pass exams, pay licensing fees, perform continuing education)
- regulation of rates & coverages (see below for 4 types of rate filings)
- regulation of claims adjusters (market conduct exams may include claims adjusting & settlement practices)

Group 2: insurer solvency
- financial exams (includes financial statements, IRIS,…)
- monitor sale of insurance securities (stocks, bonds, real estate, loans)
- determine need for receivership (either rehabilitation or liquidation of an impaired insurer)

Group 3: other services
- fraud prevention (NAIC has an online fraud reporting system)
- consumer services (education, complaint resolution)

Porter Opns State

26
Q

Briefly describe the 4 types of rate regulation

A

prior approval: rates must be approved before use (use varies by line of business)
file & use: rates must be filed before use
use & file: rates may be used immediately but must be filed within a specified time frame (like 30 days)
no-file: rates may be used without filing (sometimes called open competition)

Porter Opns State

27
Q

How would this item affect minimum capital requirements: line of business?

A
  • long tailed lines require more capital (higher settlements, more volatility)
  • lines with cat exposure require more capital (more volaility)
  • insurers with only 1 line require more capital (no diversification benefit)

Porter Opns State

28
Q

How would this item affect minimum capital requirements: ownership structure?

A
  • stock companies require less capital (can raise money by selling stock)
  • subsidiary companies require less capital (can receive capital injections from parent)
  • alien insurers may require MORE capital because regulators have less access to insurer’s operations
  • RRGs and captives may require less capital (pooling arrangments spread risk, and better risk management)

Porter Opns State

29
Q

Identify reasons for state disapproval of a form/rate filing

A

rejection based on ratemaking principles:
- rate is inadequate
- rate is excessive
- rate is unfairly discriminatory

rejection based on filing rules:
- missed deadline
- insufficient documentation
- exceeded state rate cap (even if rate isn’t excessive)

rejection for political reasons:
- government promised no rate increases

Porter Opns State

30
Q

Identify advantages for electing a state insurance commissioner

A
  • will serve a full term (an appointed commissioner is subject to dismissal by whoever appointed them)
    • will be more responsive to the electorate

May not be on test

Porter Opns State

31
Q

Identify advantages for appointing a state insurance commissioner

A

an appointed commissioner
- doesn’t need to campaign (or spend time raising campaign funds)
- is likely to be more knowledgeable about insurance (versus someone who is good populist campaigning)

Porter Opns State

32
Q

Briefly describe the duties of a state insurance commissioner

A

duties of the commissioner obviously overlap with functions of the state DOI, but a few additional items listed in Porter include:
- managing activities of the DOI
- initiating action when insurance law violations occur
- issuing annual reports
- maintaining records of DOI activities

Overall duty is to enforce insurance laws of state

Porter Opns State

33
Q

Identify and briefly describe administrative activities of a state DOI

A

communications:
- written materials
- surveys of insurers
- advisory groups
- press conferences

funding:
- premium taxes
- fees & assessments
- appropriations from state treasuries
- fines & penalties

budgeting:
- varies greatly by size of state

hiring:
- contract hiring (technical expertise)
- appointment hiring (senior staff)
- career hiring (civil service)

Porter Opns State

34
Q

What are some of the different ownership structures of insurance companies?

A

stock company:
* owned by stockholders, goal is to make a profit for stockholders (policyholders do not share in profits)
* this is the most common ownership structure in the U.S.

subsidiary:
* more than 50% of stock owned by a parent company or holding company
* parent is not necessarily another insurer (could be a bank)

mutual company:
* owned by policyholders, dividends are paid to policyholders at the discretion of management/BoD
* often fill an unmet need, can be small & local or large & international
* this is the most common ownership structure globally

reciprocal company:
* owned by policyholders, managed by attorney-in-fact, each member covers the risk of other members
* similar to mutual companies except:
- reciprocals transfer risk to other subscribers
- mutuals transfer risk to the organization

risk-retention group, captive:
* see: What is a risk retention group?

foreign insurer:
* an insurer domiciled in another state (not another country)

alien insurer:
* an insurer domiciled in another country

Porter Opns State

35
Q

Analysis of Issues and Recommended Practices

A

(3.1) The actuary should communicate clearly with the intended user in a timely manner. (I’m glad this ASOP mentioned this because normally I write my actuarial reports unclearly. Joke.)
(3.2) In terms of what the actuary should communicate, here’s a little memory trick: DAM, which stands for Data, Assumptions, Methods.
(3.3) If the actuary is pressed for time, they can skip the less important details that would otherwise need to be included in an actuarial report. (Use your judgment.)
(3.4) This section talks about disclosures that are required in an actuarial report. I’m not sure why they include this section since disclosures are discussed in detail in section 4 of this ASOP.

ASOP 41

36
Q

list the items that must be disclosed in any actuarial report

A

Conflicts of interest
* actuary’s spouse is the CFO of the company

Risks
* earthquakes are unpredictable so reserves have a wide range

Intended user

Scope evaluate
* company’s year-end reserves

Info that actuary used but doesn’t assume responsibility for
* loss estimates from a catastrophe modeler

Subsequent events
* data error in year-end data discovered in January

Limitations on applicability of findings
* applies only to lime-green, 3-door Bentleys 😄

Qualifications of actuary
* just got his FCAS - woo-hoo!!

ASOP 41

37
Q

What should actuarial report include if there are assumptions/methods prescribed by law?

A

==> name of the law
==> assumptions/methods prescribed by the law
==> that the report-writer actually followed the law.

ASOP 41

38
Q

What information needs to be disclosed when the actuary relies on someone else’s work?

A

If the work is not material, no disclosure.

If the work is material, then there are 3 choices:
* If the actuary agrees with the work, no disclosure. ← The examiner’s report did not accept this answer. See this forum discussion.
* If the actuary doesn’t agree with the work, disclose.
* If the actuary cannot judge the work, disclose.

Now, if disclosure is required, what do you have to include? The answer is the
==> extent of reliance
==> assumptions/methods relied upon
==> name of the other party.

Unrelated Note, if you materially deviate from ASOP guidance, you should disclose.

ASOP 41