Section 2- neuropsychology of language Flashcards
What and when was Franz Galls localization theory?
1798
he claimed that the cortex was made up of functionally distinct areas
what is Paul Brocca’s Aphesia (1861) and broccas Area?
- examined on Tan- discovered that damage of the left frontal lobe was linked to language production
Brocca’s Aphesia = agrammatism = broken speech and reduced syntax complextiy (plurals, past tense etc.) - Broccas area= assosciated with inability of language production although language comprehenssion remains
what was Carl Wernickles (1874) contribution and the wernickle area?
His work revealed left hemisphere dominance of language functions and the right hemisphere had no role
- idea of hemispheric splitting of functions e.g., left= verbal, right= non-verbal
- damage to left hem = unable to comprehend speech, however no impact on language production (cortical desination of temporal lobe and auditory nerve)
wernickles area= in left hemisphere and responsible for language comprehenssion
What were the chalenges of the Brocca/Wernckle area?
- too much focus on single word rather than whole sentences
- in 70s and 80s MRI scan revealed that other areas of brain were more damaged
whats did leision studies discover about language?
discovered that the facuilties of language were in the frontal and left temporal areas of the brain
what were the challenges of leision studies?
identical lesion locations were very rare
few detailed studies that included leision
the production and comprehension of language involve dynamic areas across the brain
what were results of the birth of neurolinguistics?
Shift away from postmodern inferences to live experimental studies of the brain (using neuro-imageing)
what are the 3 examples of neuro-imageing techniques?
EEG- detects electrical activity across the surface of the scalp
PET- detects gama rays
FMRI- measures oxygen levels and blood flow
what are the universal language areas?
left hemisphere= dominant for word processing tasks
right hemisphere= dominant in discourse processing tasks
however- reliance on other areas of the brain for both
inatism vs cultural? Is language innate or learned?
neurolinguistics challanges innatism as they theorise than language has universal areas in the brain whcihc are shaped by culture
Does localization vary according to age or proficiency?
Bilingual studies show varying activation based on proficiency (but not age of acquisition)
Focal activity in the left hemisphere was determined by expertise, not by age of acquisition