Section 2: Colonial Agricultural Period Flashcards
Medieval Warm Period (4)
400 - 1600 AD
temp went up 2 degrees
“productive period”
pre-contact
LIA: Little Ice Age
14th-19th century
start before Columbus arrive
Causes of LIA (4)
no solar flares/sun spots (Maunder minimum)
sulfur deposits from volcano eruption
disruption in ocean currents (glacier melt and move)
decrease in agriculture,reforestation
Societal impacts of LIA (3)
Great Famine
Bubonic Plague
Witch Hunt
Weather patterns during LIA (4)
decrease summer mean temp
increase variability rain/frost
shortened growing period
increase frequency crop failure
Virgin Soil Hypothesis
lack of defense to new disease
3 options of socio-economic adaptation
Minimize crop failure
Minimize consequences of crop failure
Abandon agriculture
socio-economic adaptation
Minimize crop failure (4)
lower land slopes
near water bodies
indoor storage (artifacts)
build forts (defense)
socio-economic adaptation
Minimize consequences of crop failure (2)
diversify subsistence (plant -> meat)
dietary transition
socio-economic adaptation
Abandon agriculture (3)
farmers to 100 hunters
technology innovation (horsebacks)
social reorganization (small, mobile groups)
Punctuated Change (2 shifts)
1st shift: LIA (forced to change subsistence)
2nd shift: ideology of domination, Manifest Destiny (adaptation under duress)
LHM
Lord Have Mercy on savages
Period of Cooperation (3)
Military alliances
Trade
Mutual assistence
Western Expansion (2)
Ideology of Domination
Manifest Destiny
Ideology of Domination
savages are dangerous, get rid of them by killing bisons
Manifest Destiny
God’s will, justify western expansion, railroad tracks
Reasons of eradication of Bisons (4)
savagery to barbarism
entertainment
rely on govmt
Yellowstone park
Used agriculture as colonial tool through (2)
Treaties
Agricultural provisions
Treaties (2)
Peace and Friendship (GB and FN)
Numbered
Numbered treaties 1-11
surrender land for farming benefits
Agricultural provisions (3)
lands
resources
training
Home Farm Program (1878)
Ontario agents
teach indigenous farming
fail bc they don’t know how to farm in plains
women support men
Social engineering and directed cultural change
influence attitudes to produce desired characteristic
Directed cultural change (3)
Report on farm practices
Metis Rehabilitation farm colonies
File Hills Farm Colony
Metis Rehabilitation Farm Colony (1900s)
road allowance to Green Lake (segregation)
fail bc: Govmt vs. church
File Hills Farm Colony (1898 - 1949)
residential school (80acres)
Church and govmt
women support men
How did indigenous success in farming (2)
used to harsh weather
collective land and labour
Public opposition to indigenous success (3)
unfair competition
Europeans are not collective
inevitable govmt support
Government policies to undermine success (8)
Home Farm Program
Severity
PFP
Permit
Pass
Greater production campaign
Soldier Settlement Act
CP
Severity Policy
change treaty formula
40 acres per person, max 160
high quality land put on lease for Europeans
Peasant Farm Policy (PFP)
take away plow and resources
“FN are peasants, use digging sticks”
Permit
legal
Indian agent
sell outside reserve
Pass
Indian agent
to go outside reserve
harassed
Greater Production Campaign
fake goal: increase food production
give more land to settlers by building govmt run farms in reserves
Soldier Settlement Act
160 acres to veterans
Certificate of Possession
FN veterans privitise
Unfulfilled treaties (2)
Treaty Land Entitlement
Agricultural Benefits Claims
Trends in SK farming (3)
less farms
bigger size farms
only 2% FN
Modern days
Barriers of Entry (5)
Farming heritage
On-reserve land ownership
high capital requirements
lack of credit access
flawed leasing requirements
2 types of flawed leasing requirements
CIRNAC
Buckshee
CIRNAC
legal, managed by govmt
take 1-2 yrs to receive payment from govmt
Buckshee
informal
get payment right away
CP money goes to individual, not FN
Problems of Buckshee (4)
financial risk
lack of control
discourage land improvements
money below market lease
SRC: Sprott Resource Corporation
What was their goal?
oil/gas company in Toronto
wanted agricultural industry, deal with FN through OEF promises
prevent other companies establish farming operations in prairies
OEF: One Earth Farms
6 promises
equity to FN
10yr long term lease
fair lease price
hire FN
job training
UofS
Negatives of OEF (5)
short investments for flip
poor management
initial investment too big
SRC not give back ownership to FN
FN hedge bets
Positives of OEF (4)
OEF lease protected by CIRNAC
land survey -> recordings
new farm enterprise
fair market lease
BSE: Mad cow crisis (2003)
wanham Alberta
loss in Canadian economy
Support for non-FN vs. support for FN
during BSE
provincial and federal aid 2.5 billion
FN not eligible: no tax documentation