Section 10 - Jus ad Bellum Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What does Article 2.4 of the UN Charter prohibit?

A

Article 2.4 prohibits the use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state, except in cases explicitly authorized by the Charter.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are the three exceptions to the prohibition of the use of force under international law?

A

Self-defense (Article 51): Individual or collective defense against an armed attack.

UNSC Law-Enforcement Measures (Article 42): Force authorized by the Security Council to maintain or restore international peace and security.

Humanitarian Intervention: Not explicitly mentioned in the UN Charter, often debated and sometimes justified under emerging customary international law.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What actions did the U.S. take against Nicaragua during 1984-86?

A

Covertly supported the Nicaraguan Contras under the Reagan Doctrine.
Mined Nicaraguan ports and imposed economic embargoes.

The case began after the United States provided financial, logistical, and military support to the Contras, a counterrevolutionary group, and engaged in direct actions like mining Nicaraguan harbors. Nicaragua claimed these acts violated international law.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What legal instruments were applicable in the Nicaragua case, and what did the ICJ find?

A

Customary International Law (CIL): U.S. violated Nicaragua’s sovereignty and laws of war by mining ports without warning.

Bilateral Treaty of 1956: U.S. violated non-intervention obligations by supporting the Contras and imposing embargoes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

How did the U.S. justify its actions in Nicaragua, and why did the ICJ reject this justification?

A

The U.S. claimed collective self-defense, alleging Nicaragua supported rebels in El Salvador.

ICJ rejected the claim, finding:
1. No armed attack occurred to trigger self-defense under Article 51.
2. Providing weapons to rebels does not constitute an armed attack.
3. U.S. actions violated necessity and proportionality principles.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What were the ICJ’s conclusions regarding the U.S. actions in Nicaragua?

A

U.S. actions constituted a breach of international law.
U.S. was found responsible for reparations to Nicaragua, though it ignored the ruling.
Nicaragua’s appeal to UN Charter Article 94 (enforcement by UNSC) failed due to U.S. influence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What incidents led to the Iranian Oil Platforms case? 1987-2003

A

October 1987: After an attack on a U.S. ship (Sea Isle City), the U.S. attacked the Reshded oil platform.

April 1988: After a U.S. ship (Samuel Robarts) struck a mine, the U.S. attacked two more oil platforms (NASR and Solomon).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What was Iran’s claim, and what treaty was invoked?

A

Iran claimed the U.S. violated the 1955 Treaty of Amity, specifically freedom of commerce provisions.

The treaty included a compromissory clause granting ICJ jurisdiction.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

How did the ICJ assess the U.S.’s actions under international law?

US v Iran

A

Attribution of attacks: The ICJ found prior attacks (e.g., mining) dubiously attributable to Iran.

Self-defense claim: Rejected, as the U.S.’s counterattacks were retaliatory rather than necessary or proportionate.

Freedom of commerce: Not violated, as the embargo preceded the destruction of oil platforms.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What was the broader implication of the ICJ ruling in the Iranian Oil Platforms case?

A

The ICJ highlighted the U.S.’s disproportionate actions but avoided broader implications due to the narrow scope of the bilateral treaty. Critics viewed the ruling as politically motivated to implicitly criticize U.S. actions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What occurred during Israel’s airstrike on the Osirak nuclear reactor in 1981?

A

Israel launched a preemptive strike on Iraq’s Osirak nuclear reactor, claiming it was necessary to prevent Iraq from developing nuclear weapons.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What was the UNSC’s response to the Osirak airstrike?

A

UNSC Resolution 487 condemned the attack, finding no justification for preemptive self-defense and calling for Israel to provide reparations to Iraq.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

How does this case relate to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT)?

A

The NPT requires member states to use nuclear energy for peaceful purposes and allows inspections to ensure compliance. Iraq’s reactor was under IAEA safeguards at the time.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is the purpose of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT)?

A

Prevent horizontal proliferation (spread of nuclear weapons to non-nuclear states).

Promote peaceful nuclear energy use under international inspections.

Commit nuclear states to disarmament efforts.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons (TPNW), and how does it differ from the NPT?

A

Adopted in 2017, entered into force in 2021.

Explicitly bans nuclear weapons, their use, possession, and development.

Broader in scope than the NPT but lacks support from major nuclear states.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What were the main legal claims brought by Nicaragua against the US?

A

Nicaragua alleged violations of:

The prohibition on the use of force.
The principle of non-intervention.
Sovereignty.
Obligations under the Treaty of Friendship, Commerce, and Navigation (1956).
Customary international law.

17
Q

What was the ICJ’s ruling on its jurisdiction in the case?

US v Nicaragua

A

The ICJ ruled it had jurisdiction based on:

The declarations of both states under Article 36(2) and (5).
The 1956 Treaty of Friendship, Commerce, and Navigation.
The principle that procedural objections could not exclude substantive jurisdiction.

18
Q

How did the United States respond to the ICJ’s rulings abt Nicaragua?

A

The U.S. rejected the ICJ’s jurisdiction and rulings, ceased participation in proceedings, and vetoed enforcement measures in the UN Security Council

19
Q

What legal principles did the Nicaragua v. United States case reinforce in international law?

A

The prohibition of the use of force (Article 2(4) of the UN Charter).

The principle of non-intervention.

The binding nature of ICJ judgments under Article 94 of the UN Charter.