SEA Economic development Flashcards
SG: State led industralisation: 1961-1964 Development plan outcome
Saw an increased focus on investments regarding the quality of human capital and resulted in foreign investment in manufacturing increasing by 24 times by 1970, focus on industrialisation
EDB 1961 (% of development)
One-stop investment agency, served to stimulate private capital
Of $871 million allocated for development, 58% was for economic expenditure
Goh Keng Swee and National Oil and Steel Mills. Manufacturing as share of GDP
13.2% 1960- 29.1% 1980
Singapore Petroluem Company (state led industrialisation)
especially with Singapore being an oil refinery centre (key export commodity) ->
sustained, high GDP growth rate of 9.0% in 1970s despite worldwide recession from oil crisis
Controlled air transportation with the creation of Singapore Airlines in 1972 –> outcome
(state led industrialisation)
This intervention in the industrialization process led to Import Substitution Industrialisation rising to 22% of the GDP by 1975.
Privatisation and Diversification (SG)
1983 Singapore Technologies Corporation (STC) created to promote advanced technologies
1981 Government of Singapore Investment corporation (GIC) established to invest in high-tech MNCs overseas
(2)
Success: Value-added per worker almost doubled from 1979 to 1984
More than 60 MNCs have set up headquarters here, including firms in the electronics, construction, transportation and pharmaceutical sector
Privatisation and Diversification
1995 Cluster Development Fund of $1 billion for strategic investments in making Singapore a hub for operational headquarters and providing corporate services (services GDP stat)
Service sector went from 16% of GDP (1965) to 28% (2010)
Privatisation and Diversification Singapore
Public Sector Divestment Committee (1986)
Privatise certain state owned enterprises, by 1992, SIA, SGH and SBS had been privatised
7% GDP growth in the 1990s was fuelled by the private sector rather than the public sector
Malaysia State led industrialisation (NEP) -> 4
Extensive state investment in agriculture and rural development
1956 Federal Land Development Authority (FELDA) for land allocation to Malays
Rubber Industry Smallholders Development Authority (RISDA) to finance Malay rubber smallholders
Bumiputera ownership
1975 Industrial Coordination Act that necessitated registration of firms with NEP characteristics
1990 corporate equity target of 30%
Moderate nationalism
London Tin became Malaysian Mining Corporation
1974 Petronas nationalised the oil industry
1980s Malaysia State led industrialisation (2) + industry statistic increase
PERNAS
HICOM 1981
Industry as percentage of GDP
24.4% 1970- 41.7% 1990
Malaysia 1990s policies for industrialisation + statistic (2)
Industry as percentage of GDP
24.4% 1970- 41.7% 1990
1990 Action Plan for Industrial Technology Development outlining the development of high technology industries to industrialise the nation by 2020
1993 Malaysian Technology Development Corporation (MTDC) introduced, and invested in eight local firms to help their technological advancement
Malaysia privatisation and Diversification OUTCOME 1980s- 1990s primary exports stat
Petroleum was replaced by semiconductor devices and automatic data as the top 2 exports (Action Plan success),
Primary Exports fell from 68.6% in 1975- 24.4% in 1994
Malaysia Nationalisation
1970s, PNB purchased British controlling interests in the Guthrie Corporation, London tin became Malaysian Mining Corporation
Petronas nationalised the oil industry in 1974,
Control of key sectors boosted the progress of industrialisation and enabled sustained growth over time
GDP growth increased from 6.5% to almost 8% from 1960s to 1970
since MY was an oil exporter during the oil crises
Privatisation of Malaysia state owned corporations
Malaysia Incorporated 1983 and manufacturing as percentage of total exports stat + growth rate in exports
By 1992, 13 state enterprises privatised
Foreign players attracted to Malaysia -
Manufacturing was 60% of total exports in 1990, 20% growth rate in exports from 1990-1995
Philippines Negative Outcome: Sharp dip in average annual GDP growth rate
1970s → 5.9%
1980s → 1.8% (-4.1%)
Philippines exports as percentage of GDP
Exports as a % of GDP remained relatively low 1970s-80s: Averaged 20%
Philippines: Anti foreing/ chinese nationalism (2) + outcome
1954: Anti-Chinese retail Trade Nationalisation Act under President Garcia, to force the Chinese out of the Rice and Corn trades
1958: Congress Bill called for important industries to be at least 60% owned by native Fillipinos
-> 1948-65: Filipino participation in the economy rose 3x from 23% of imports to 70%
Philippines: Central planning and Protectionism + outcome (positive manufacturing and negative)
PIA
Protectionism: Import and forex controls extended to new industries
1950-60: Rapid industrialisation as manufacturing expanded from 8-20% GDP
Failure of ISI as the protectionism measures like the high tariffs and quantitative restrictions discouraged the growth of efficient domestic industries
Philippines state agencies for infrastructrual development and corporations
NUMBER OF STATE COMPANIES INCREASED TO 300 UNDER MARCOS
National Economic Development Authority (NEDA) oversaw ED
National Development Company securing needed land for agricultural expansion
Philippines intervention in agriculture
60s: International Rice Research Institute (IRRI) based in the Philippines
Developed a high-yielding variety of rice: IR8,
this variant was quickly spread all across southeast asia and to india, leading to huge leaps in agricultural productivity
OUTCOME
1972: Philippines was self-sufficient in rice for the first time
Rice production increased by 2 times from 3.9 million tons in 1961 to 7.9 million tons in 1981
Philippines government actions to promote FDI + outcome
1967: Investment Incentives Act used to encourage Philippine business to accept joint venture-ships with foreign Transnational Corporations (TNCs), encouraged foreign investment in infrastructural development
Consultative Group under World bank to discuss capital inflows needed by the economy to foster the growth environment
Under Aquino
Foreign investment quadrupled during her term, through the period of political stabilisation that led to the return of investor confidence
Philippines Foreign borrowing + DEBT LEVEL statistic
Foreign borrowing began in the mid 1960s as the state provided credit for infrastructural and econ dev projects
debt service ratio of 20% in 1977, foreign debt US$25billion in 1983
Philippines attempted switch to EOI + export promotion (policy + positive outcome), but negative outcome overall
Reducing industrial protection (Tariffs cut to a maximum of 50% over a 5 year period from 1981-1985)
1992: Trade liberalisation under Ramos
Ramos lowered tariffs on hundreds of goods
Allowed foreign investors to own 100% of Philippine companies to attract foreign capital (effective)
FOREIGN INVESTMENT PEAKED IN 1994, GDP GROWTH RECOVERED TO 4.5%
Stagnation of industrial sector
1985-2000: industry as % of GDP remained the same from 37-35%
Philippines Pervasive Crony capitalism (2) + values
Robert Benedicto (friend of marcos) installed as head of the government owned Philippine Sugar Commission and operated through 2 state agencies. Price increases were not passed on to Sugar growers
80s: Govt absorbed losses of monopolies,
14B peso loss for Benedicto’s sugar empire when world sugar price crashed in, leaving him with tons of unexportable sugar
Loans from government finance corporations were extended to favoured enterprises, like
Marinduque Mining Company (15 billion pesos in debt)
Delta Motors Corporation (2 billion dollars in debt)