SEA Economic development Flashcards

1
Q

SG: State led industralisation: 1961-1964 Development plan outcome

A

Saw an increased focus on investments regarding the quality of human capital and resulted in foreign investment in manufacturing increasing by 24 times by 1970, focus on industrialisation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

EDB 1961 (% of development)

A

One-stop investment agency, served to stimulate private capital

Of $871 million allocated for development, 58% was for economic expenditure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Goh Keng Swee and National Oil and Steel Mills. Manufacturing as share of GDP

A

13.2% 1960- 29.1% 1980

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Singapore Petroluem Company (state led industrialisation)

A

especially with Singapore being an oil refinery centre (key export commodity) ->
sustained, high GDP growth rate of 9.0% in 1970s despite worldwide recession from oil crisis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Controlled air transportation with the creation of Singapore Airlines in 1972 –> outcome

(state led industrialisation)

A

This intervention in the industrialization process led to Import Substitution Industrialisation rising to 22% of the GDP by 1975.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Privatisation and Diversification (SG)

1983 Singapore Technologies Corporation (STC) created to promote advanced technologies

1981 Government of Singapore Investment corporation (GIC) established to invest in high-tech MNCs overseas

(2)

A

Success: Value-added per worker almost doubled from 1979 to 1984

More than 60 MNCs have set up headquarters here, including firms in the electronics, construction, transportation and pharmaceutical sector

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Privatisation and Diversification

1995 Cluster Development Fund of $1 billion for strategic investments in making Singapore a hub for operational headquarters and providing corporate services (services GDP stat)

A

Service sector went from 16% of GDP (1965) to 28% (2010)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Privatisation and Diversification Singapore

Public Sector Divestment Committee (1986)
Privatise certain state owned enterprises, by 1992, SIA, SGH and SBS had been privatised

A

7% GDP growth in the 1990s was fuelled by the private sector rather than the public sector

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Malaysia State led industrialisation (NEP) -> 4

A

Extensive state investment in agriculture and rural development
1956 Federal Land Development Authority (FELDA) for land allocation to Malays

Rubber Industry Smallholders Development Authority (RISDA) to finance Malay rubber smallholders

Bumiputera ownership
1975 Industrial Coordination Act that necessitated registration of firms with NEP characteristics
1990 corporate equity target of 30%

Moderate nationalism
London Tin became Malaysian Mining Corporation

1974 Petronas nationalised the oil industry

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

1980s Malaysia State led industrialisation (2) + industry statistic increase

A

PERNAS

HICOM 1981

Industry as percentage of GDP
24.4% 1970- 41.7% 1990

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Malaysia 1990s policies for industrialisation + statistic (2)

A

Industry as percentage of GDP
24.4% 1970- 41.7% 1990

1990 Action Plan for Industrial Technology Development outlining the development of high technology industries to industrialise the nation by 2020

1993 Malaysian Technology Development Corporation (MTDC) introduced, and invested in eight local firms to help their technological advancement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Malaysia privatisation and Diversification OUTCOME 1980s- 1990s primary exports stat

A

Petroleum was replaced by semiconductor devices and automatic data as the top 2 exports (Action Plan success),
Primary Exports fell from 68.6% in 1975- 24.4% in 1994

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Malaysia Nationalisation
1970s, PNB purchased British controlling interests in the Guthrie Corporation, London tin became Malaysian Mining Corporation

Petronas nationalised the oil industry in 1974,

A

Control of key sectors boosted the progress of industrialisation and enabled sustained growth over time

GDP growth increased from 6.5% to almost 8% from 1960s to 1970
since MY was an oil exporter during the oil crises

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Privatisation of Malaysia state owned corporations

Malaysia Incorporated 1983 and manufacturing as percentage of total exports stat + growth rate in exports

A

By 1992, 13 state enterprises privatised

Foreign players attracted to Malaysia -
Manufacturing was 60% of total exports in 1990, 20% growth rate in exports from 1990-1995

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Philippines Negative Outcome: Sharp dip in average annual GDP growth rate

A

1970s → 5.9%
1980s → 1.8% (-4.1%)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Philippines exports as percentage of GDP

A

Exports as a % of GDP remained relatively low 1970s-80s: Averaged 20%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Philippines: Anti foreing/ chinese nationalism (2) + outcome

A

1954: Anti-Chinese retail Trade Nationalisation Act under President Garcia, to force the Chinese out of the Rice and Corn trades

1958: Congress Bill called for important industries to be at least 60% owned by native Fillipinos

-> 1948-65: Filipino participation in the economy rose 3x from 23% of imports to 70%

18
Q

Philippines: Central planning and Protectionism + outcome (positive manufacturing and negative)

A

PIA

Protectionism: Import and forex controls extended to new industries

1950-60: Rapid industrialisation as manufacturing expanded from 8-20% GDP

Failure of ISI as the protectionism measures like the high tariffs and quantitative restrictions discouraged the growth of efficient domestic industries

19
Q

Philippines state agencies for infrastructrual development and corporations

A

NUMBER OF STATE COMPANIES INCREASED TO 300 UNDER MARCOS

National Economic Development Authority (NEDA) oversaw ED

National Development Company securing needed land for agricultural expansion

20
Q

Philippines intervention in agriculture

A

60s: International Rice Research Institute (IRRI) based in the Philippines
Developed a high-yielding variety of rice: IR8,
this variant was quickly spread all across southeast asia and to india, leading to huge leaps in agricultural productivity

OUTCOME
1972: Philippines was self-sufficient in rice for the first time
Rice production increased by 2 times from 3.9 million tons in 1961 to 7.9 million tons in 1981

21
Q

Philippines government actions to promote FDI + outcome

A

1967: Investment Incentives Act used to encourage Philippine business to accept joint venture-ships with foreign Transnational Corporations (TNCs), encouraged foreign investment in infrastructural development

Consultative Group under World bank to discuss capital inflows needed by the economy to foster the growth environment

Under Aquino
Foreign investment quadrupled during her term, through the period of political stabilisation that led to the return of investor confidence

22
Q

Philippines Foreign borrowing + DEBT LEVEL statistic

A

Foreign borrowing began in the mid 1960s as the state provided credit for infrastructural and econ dev projects

debt service ratio of 20% in 1977, foreign debt US$25billion in 1983

23
Q

Philippines attempted switch to EOI + export promotion (policy + positive outcome), but negative outcome overall

A

Reducing industrial protection (Tariffs cut to a maximum of 50% over a 5 year period from 1981-1985)

1992: Trade liberalisation under Ramos

Ramos lowered tariffs on hundreds of goods
Allowed foreign investors to own 100% of Philippine companies to attract foreign capital (effective)

FOREIGN INVESTMENT PEAKED IN 1994, GDP GROWTH RECOVERED TO 4.5%

Stagnation of industrial sector
1985-2000: industry as % of GDP remained the same from 37-35%

24
Q

Philippines Pervasive Crony capitalism (2) + values

A

Robert Benedicto (friend of marcos) installed as head of the government owned Philippine Sugar Commission and operated through 2 state agencies. Price increases were not passed on to Sugar growers

80s: Govt absorbed losses of monopolies,
14B peso loss for Benedicto’s sugar empire when world sugar price crashed in, leaving him with tons of unexportable sugar

Loans from government finance corporations were extended to favoured enterprises, like
Marinduque Mining Company (15 billion pesos in debt)
Delta Motors Corporation (2 billion dollars in debt)

25
Philippines financial cronyism + negative outcome of DEBT
No regulation on borrowing -> Borrowing increased greatly in the 1970s Debt service ratio increased beyond dangerous level of 20%, Total foreign debt increased by 10 fold to 25 billion between 1972 and 1983, one of the 10 most indebted developing nations Repayment took up to 10% of GDP annually during Aquino’s term in the 1990s
26
Philippines Failure of privatisation and continued crony dominance
Intended to break up monopolies in the major sectors (Privatisation) 1992: Philippine Long Distance Telephone (PLDT) company owned by the Cojuangco family owning 90% of 1 million telephone lines. 1993: 13 companies competing to provide lower cost services, but PLDT continued to dominate the telecom industry
27
Philippines role of chinese
1980s: 1.3% of the population but 60% of economic control 1993-1997: 1789-286 victims of anti-Chinese violence and kidnappings
28
Government nationalisation- Indonesia + outcome
1957: Expropriation of Dutch Property 300 Dutch plantations and 300 firms in other areas expropriated Reduced trade, declining GNP / capita and collapse of economy by 1965, hyperinflation of 500% [excessive]
29
State leadership in ISI under Sukarno (Indonesia) + outcome (2)
1959: initiated an 8 year ‘Guided Economy’ development plan under Sukarno which entailed a 12x increase in government expenditure (Failed due to little experience) + OUTCOME: 1959-66: Value of exports fell from US931m to US685m 1960-67: foreign reserves fell from 313 million- 17 million. Contributory factors include the rejection of foreign aid, Konfrontasi and West Irian dispute
30
Indonesia state development in agriculture + outcome
Bulog→ coordinated rice procurement, distribution, pricing Bimas→ provided credit/ physica inputs to promote rice production From 1968-1989, annual rice production increased from 12 million to 29 million tons Yields increased from 2.14 tons of padi per hectare to 4.23 tons per hectare Indonesia self sufficient by mid 1980s
31
Indonesia State Agencies for infrastructure
Bimas, Bulog, State Secretariat (Sekneg) allocated construction contracts for government
32
Indonesia State corporations (direct participation) NATIONALISATION + production outcome
Pertamina (oil) and Department of Industry led investments in petrochemicals, steel, cement and forestry products 1975: state firms produced 75% of cement, 52% of both paper products and machinery and 40% of food Allowed Indo to build up industrial base and diversify away from relying on primary products and agriculture for export revenue // SG JTC & MSIA FELDA, PERNAS
33
Indonesia government actions to promote aid + outcome
1967 Foreign Investment Law to attract foreign investors with tax concessions and a guarantee against expropriation After the October 1988 reform package encouraging capital inflow, FDI increased six-fold 1980-90!
34
Indonesia foreign Aid
1965: main sponsors were the USSR and other communist states 1967: Intergovernmental Group on Indonesia (IGGI) formed among 14 nations to raise aid for Indo , raising 2.5 billion in 1985-1986 Relied on IMF for advice Consultative Group under WB to discuss capital inflows for Indonesia
34
Indonesia Failure of switch to EOI despite Repelita VI outcome
Limited diversification and industrialisation 1980: Oil contributed 80% of export earnings 1985: top three exports constituted 69% of total exports Cronyism in protection resulted in a narrow industrial and manufacturing base, constrained by tariff and protectionism barriers to the most lucrative markets Astra/Indomobile (see below
34
Financial Cronyism outcome Indonesia (positive- (2) /negative -debt level) (policies separately)
OUTCOMES Positive: Share of non-oil exports rose from 31% to 50% by the end of the 80s Positive: GDP growth: 7% in 1990 Negative: Concentration of economic power in Sino-Indonesian businessmen 1989: Nursed Asia’s largest debt at US 58 Bill
35
Indonesia crony capitalism (3)
Early 1960s-1970s, Sutowo, director of Pertamina, embarked on an ambitious investment programme that included huge liquified LNG projects, fertiliser plants, oil facilities Nov 1974, Pertamina debt was US 10 billion, ⅔ of Indonesia’s GNP at the time 1988: Bulog awarded a soymeal monopoly to Sarpindo, which was owned by Tommy Suharto and Bob Hasan 1990: MOT awarded clove crop monopoly to Tommy Suharto, venture financed by US $550 million from Bank Indonesia which was reserved for agricultural production
35
Indonesia Cronyism resulting in state overprotectionism
Deregulation allowed them to gain ascendancy in the car industry in particular, with Astra 40% of production & Indomobil having 21% Highly protective tariffs of 100%-300% on imports of completely built up passenger vehicles, Indonesia failed to develop the capacity to produce engines as the basis for a national industry
35
Financial Cronyism Indonesia (policy)
88 Reform Package: deregulation of finance sector and allowing for private banks to start lending money out Boosted investor confidence and 40 banks were given licences in 2 years Liem Sioe Leng and the Liem Group Lending regulations were unchecked, Liem bank was owed 60% of its loan portfolio by other loan companies and had to rely on a government bailout Private sector debt was 36 billion more than foreign reserves Lending of money was name-driven and relationship-driven, with few checks and balances to ensure they were being put to good use and could be serviced. Massive fluctuation of the rupiah, sometimes as much as 10% a day
36
Indonesia Debt levels
1980: foreign loans constituted 42% of Indonesia’s state development budget ⇒ Largest debt at USD58b [1989]
37
Indonesia Chinese
Chinese 1980s: Chinese occupied 3.8% of the population but controlled 73% of the economy Astra Group and Liem Group had substantial holdings Result: Social instability 1973: Bandung Riots 1974: Malari riots
38
Indonesia equity Results
1990: average urban incomes 42% higher than average rural incomes, by 1993 this had risen to 92%