Scientific and reflective practitioner model Flashcards
Long and Hollin (1997)
3 elements to the S-P model Undertaking research Using the research findings Evaluating practicce Repeat
Schon (1987)
Theories in Use
Theories that are formed out of the subjective and clinical experience of the practitioner that are resorted to for guidance when propositional knowldege fails
It is monitored by feedback and progress monitoring and can be revised, changed and evaluated
Used for reflecting IN practice/action
Also used the analogy of the swapy low lands
When reflecting IN action, we have to act spontaneously and use our knowledge of the present to guide what we do and use the outcomes/consequences of that action to guide how wee spontaneously act in the future
Irving and Williams (1995)
Reflection increases ones awareness of the beliefes and asuumptions used to form theories in use
White and Stancombe (2003)
Reflection ON action provides the distance needed to rigourously critique practice and passt interventions
Strawbridge and Woolfe (2010)
Reflection ON action is usually done via supervision
Reflective Scientist Practitioner Model - using psychological theory and research as a guide for how to handle the messy problems that occur in therapy
Kolb (E.G. 2014)
Experiential Learning Cycle
Concrete experience
Reflective observation (of experiences/thoughts/actions and beliefes)
Abstract Conceptualisation (of pattersn.relationships and generating hypotheses)
Active Experimentation (this generates new concrete experiences)
Donati (2016)
The experiential learning cycle has face validity
Ralfe (2001)
The reflective practitioner model values contextual over theoretical knowledge associated with scientific research
Frank (1984)
2 criticisms of the S-P model
- Clinicians dont often engage in research that requires training
- The interests and talants for research and clinical work are incompatible
Gambril (1990, p.343)
Argues for the S-P model by saying not training students in research promotes ‘mystery over mastery’
Long and Hollin (1997)
The S-P model does not realistically translate to clinical work
Clarke (2014)
Successful reflective practice requires person-centred idiology (Model for reflective practice): Empathy Communication Attitude and personal qualities Self-awareness Process oriented Accademic Knowledge
Kison, Moorere and Villarosa (2015)
S-P model helps students by giving them:
A deeper understanding of client concerns
An ability to factor in multicultural and sociocultural factors into therapy
Ability to objectively inform and evaluate assessments for treatment and diagnosis
Increased ability to present different treatment options to clients
Chang, Lee and Hargreaves (2007)
Thematic meta-analysis into the conflicting role of practitioners
Graduate training is based of the S-P model which under-prepares students for the realities of practice Clinical psychologists believe that the S-P model needs adapting in order to fit with modern day practice (E.G. By becoming more versatile)
50/50 between clinical psychologists who find the S-P model beneficial and those who find it detrimental
Procter (1987) and Wright and Griffiths (2010)
Suppervision has a nermative, formative and restorative function for the supervisee