Science and Ideology Flashcards
What are the two arguments which support the view that science is superior to religion?
- science is an “open” belief system, religion is “closed’
- science practices CUDOS norms
According to Popper (1959), how is science an open belief system?
An open belief system is one where knowledge claims are open to criticism and can be disproved by testing. Scientific theories are backed by research and are subject to scrutiny. Science operates with the falsification principle, meaning scientists strive to disprove theories by finding evidence. Scientific work is also cumulative meaning current day scientists try to expand the work of previous generations.
According to Horton (1973), how is religion a closed belief system? (closed vs open)
Sees religion is unwilling to be challenged, often punishing those who dare to criticise it. Unlike science, religious knowledge is fixed and unchallenged, it therefore makes knowledge claims that cannot be successfully overturned because they are set in stone. When challenged, religion uses get out clauses that reinforces the image that prevent it from being disproved
According to Polanyi (1958), what are the 3 ways religious leaders avoid scrutiny? (open vs closed)
- circular arguments
- subsidary arguments
- deny legitimacy of rivals
How does religion use circular arguments against their critics? (open vs closed)
Every time their belief is challenged, they try to explain and justify it within a sacred text. For example, is a religious leader was questioned over homophobic views, they will site that Adam and Eve were a heterosexual couple meaning God was willing for mankind to be straight
How does religion use subsidary arguments? (open vs closed)
When the actions of God are criticised, they offer an alternative explanation. For example, if innocent people have died they use arguments such as god working in “mysterious ways”
How does religion deny the legitimacy of its rivals? (open vs closed)
They refuse to accept any alternative world view attacking those that disagree. For example, the Christian New Right in the USA
Evaluation of the view that religion is a closed belief system while science is an open one?
Scientific theories become embedded and presumed to be true. Furthermore, religion has adapted to a modern society and has many different sects e.c.t.
According to Merton (1973), what are CUDOS norms and how does it make science superior?
Science is a superior belief system and that is why is continues to thrive. There has been a number of benefits that have impacted all of society, including; economics, health e.c.t
According to Merton (1973), what are the 4 CUDOS norms? (CUDOS)
- communism
- universalism
- disintredness
- organised scepticism
According to Merton (1973), what is the CUDOS norm of communism?
Scientific knowledge is there to benefit everyone, scientists share their knowledge and research with the global community which has benefited sectors such as medical care
According to Merton (1973), what is the CUDOS norm of universalism?
Scientific research is based on a universal and objective criteria. Scientists work with one another around the globe; sharing their findings are reviewing work.
According to Merton (1973), what is the CUDOS norm of disintredness?
Scientists seek to uncover knowledge just for the sake of it as they want to advance their knowledge of how the world works. They don’t do it for money of a career - just for personal interest
According to Merton (1973), what is the CUDOS norm of organised scepticism?
All knowledge is open to rigorous testing and possible falsification. Scientists are always aware that their ideas may be disproved with time and they are accepting of this. This allows science to be cumulative
Evaluation of the idea that science adheres to CUDOS norms and therefore is superior?
Challenge each CUDOS norm
What are the 3 arguments which suggest that science is a closed belief system and is therefore inferior?
- restricted by paradigms
- science is a social construction
- science only benefits those in power
According to Kuhn (1970), how is science restricted by paradigms?
Most major fields are restricted by paradigms which refers to a major assumption which scientists make when it comes to method of research and what evidence to focus on. Once a paradigm is established, future scientists are expected to work within the paradigm to find more evidence, not try and prove it wrong (falsification and cumulation)