Schedule F Flashcards
Schedule F Parts
- Part 1 - assumed reinsurance
- Part 2 - premium portfolio reinsurance
- Part 3 - ceded reinsurance
- Part 4 - Issuing or Confirming Banks for Letters of Credit from Schedule F, Part 3
- Part 5 - Interrogatories for Schedule F, Part 3
- Part 6 - restatement of balance sheet (to identify net credit for reinsurance)
Groups used in Schedule F, Part 1
Affiliated insurers
* US intercompany pooling
* US non-pool
* Other (non US)
Other US unaffiliated insurers
Pools & associations
* mandatory pools
* voluntary pools
Other non-US insurers
Schedule F - Part 1
- Provides the total assumed reinsurance balances by reinsured
- Enables an understanding of the risks associated with assumed reinsurance transactions as of the current year
Schedule F - Part 2
- Provides a detailed listing of portfolio reinsurance transactions effected or canceled during the current year
Funds held under reinsurance contracts
Portion of the premium due to the reinsurer that is withheld by the ceding company to pay claims:
* Liability for the insurer
* Asset for the reinsurer
Portfolio reinsurance
The transfer of policies-in-force, or the transfer of liabilities remaining on a block of the insurer’s business
Fronting carrier
- an insurer that cedes a large portion of its business (>75%) so the reinsurer can avoid regulatory oversight
- may occur when the reinsurer is not authorized to conduct business in the ceding insurer’s jurisdiction
- often occurs in WC due to strict licensing requirements
Reasons Schedule F is important tool to monitor solvency
- identifies gross assumed losses
- identifies slow-paying (authorized) reinsurers for further scrutiny
- measures significance of reinsurance against surplus
- provides financial strength information of reinsureds & reinsurers
Schedule F, Part 3 Special Codes
- 2: Cessions of 75% or more of subject premium
- 3: Counterparty Reporting Exception for Asbestos and Pollution Contracts
- 4: IBNR Losses on Contracts in Force Prior to July 1, 1984 Exempt from: Statutory Provision for Unauthorized Reinsurance
Balance Sheet & Schedule F mapping
Assets:
* Amounts recoverable from reinsurers (F, Part 3)
Liabilities:
* Reinsurance payable on paid losses and loss adjustment expenses (F, Part 1)
* Unearned premiums for ceded reinsurance (F, Part 3)
* Ceded reinsurance premiums payable net of ceding commissions (F, Part 3)
* Funds held by company under reinsurance treaties (F, Part 3)
* Provision for reinsurance (F, Part 3)
Provision for reinsurance - definition
a minimum reserve that reflects estimated uncollectible reinsurance recoveries
Balance Sheet changes - removing reinsurance
Assets:
* reinsurance recoverable on loss and loss adjustment expense payment (reversal)
* net amount recoverable from reinsurers (balances liabilities)
Liabilities:
* losses & LAE (schedule P ceded)
* unearned premium (schedule F ceded)
* ceded reinsurance premiums payable (reversal)
* funds held by company under reinsurance treaties (reversal)
* provision for reinsurance (reversal)
Strengths of Schedule F as solvency monitoring tool
- RP is formulaic - easy to compare across years & companies
- RP is formulaic - hard to manipulate because inputs are numbers from financial statements
- RP accounts for reinsurer credit risk with penalties for unauthorized reinsurers (often this means foreign insurers)
- RP accounts for reinsurer credit risk with penalties for slow-paying reinsurers
- Schedule F shows impact to surplus if reinsurance contracts are canceled
Weaknesses of Schedule F as solvency monitoring tool
- RP is formulaic - may mask management’s better informed estimate of collectability risk
- RP is formulaic - but no statistical basis for formula - may not represent true collectability risk
- RP penalizes unauthorized reinsurers regardless of their financial strength
- RP penalizes slow-paying reinsurers regardless of their financial strength and 20% slow-payer threshold is arbitrary
- Schedule F doesn’t directly measure reinsurer’s solvency which is the true source of uncollectability risk
- Schedule F doesn’t measure the quality of an insurer’s reinsurance management
Schedule F enhancements to improve monitoring of credit risk
- disclose details of reinsurance arrangements (Schedule F doesn’t measure quality of an insurer’s reinsurance)
- include management input of uncollectability risk (the formula may miss important factors)
- include reinsurer ratings (Schedule F doesn’t do this even though it is an important risk factor)
- replace 20% slow-pay threshold with a sliding scale and consider reasons for slow-pay