COPLFR SAO Flashcards

1
Q

Qualified Actuary

A

Qualified Actuary is a person who…
* meets education, experience, continuing education requirements
* of the SQS for SAO (Specific Qualification Standards for Statements of Actuarial Opinion)
* as set forth in the QS (Qualification Standards) for actuaries issuing opinions in the US
* promulgated by the AAA (American Academy of Actuaries) not the CAS

AND both
1. maintains an AAD (Accepted Actuarial Designation)
2. is a member of a professional actuarial association that
* requires adherence to the AAA code of conduct
* requires adherence to the US qualification standards
* participates in ABCD (Actuarial Board for Counselling & Discipline) for members practicing in the US

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Exceptions to Definition of Qualified Actuary

A

Can still be qualified actuary if:
you are evaluated by the Academy’s CPC (Casualty Practice Council) and determined to be a Qualified Actuary for particular lines of business

Special Situations:
1. The AA is a qualified actuary by the exception above.
2. The AA is not a qualified actuary but is approved by the domiciliary commissioner.

For these situations, the company must attach, each year, the approval letter and reference such in the Identification paragraph of the SAO.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

4 categories of qualification standards for P&C appointed actuaries

A

US Qualification Standards - General
* FCAS/ACAS/MAAA, 3 years experience, 30 hours continuing ed

US Qualification Standards - Specific
* general requirements + 3 years experience in relevant area + 15 hours continuing ed in relevant area

NAIC Standards
* has an AAD or the CPC (Casualty Practice Council) has determined the actuary is a qualified actuary for that line of business/activity
* NAIC standards largely just restate items (i) and (ii) from the definition of “qualified actuary”

CAS Standards
* actuaries doing the SAO must meet US Qualification Standards
* the CAS standard just seems a repeat of the above

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

AAD or Accepted Actuarial Designation

A

designation that meets or exceeds the NAIC’s minimum standards for an appointed actuary

minimum standards are satisfied by:
* FCAS with Exam 6U
* ACAS with Exam 6U, 7
* FSA with additional relevant exams

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Qualification documentation (Who, When, What?)

A

Who: to the BOD (Board of Directors)
When: on occasion of appointment
What: biographical info and how requirements for qualified actuary will be met

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Scope section disclosures

A
  • Data sources
  • Reserve items in opinion
  • Evaluation of the data for reasonableness & consistency
  • Accounting basis for reserves
  • Review date
  • Intercompany pooling (if applicable)
  • Reviewed methods & assumptions in determining reserves
  • Reconciliation to Schedule P
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Schedule P Reconciliation

A
  • reconcile the given data on a direct + assumed basis and net of reinsurance basis to Schedule P - Part 1 or explain why omitted reconciliations were not done.
  • reconcile by line of business & accident year
  • explain any discrepancies

Schedule P reconciliations often include complicated mapping of the data used by the AA to the data within Schedule P

“I reconciled the data to Schedule P - Part 1 of the company’s current Annual Statement”

“The data generally reconciled with one exception: The total amount of Company XXX’s paid loss differs by $21,000. This difference results from rounding and is not material.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Letter of Representation

A

Non-employee Appointed Actuaries often request a letter of representation from company management.

Items cited in this could include:
* company-provided complete and accurate data
* information on subsequent events
* bases of carried reserves (net/gross of reinsurance, salvage & subrogation, risk margin)
* changes in reserving methodology

Assures that the non-employee AA has all the relevant info on which to form an opinion.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

SAO - Types of Opinion

A
  • Reasonable: recorded reserves are within actuary’s reasonable range of unpaid claim liabilities
  • Inadequate: recorded reserves are below actuary’s reasonable range of unpaid claim liabilities
  • Excessive: recorded reserves are above actuary’s reasonable range of unpaid claim liabilities
  • Qualified: actuary is unable to issue an opinion on certain material items (reserves could still be within actuary’s range)
  • None: actuary is unable to conclude that reserves are reasonable
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Opinion language - Reasonable

A

In my opinion, the amounts carried in Exhibit A on account of the items identified…
[A] Meet the requirements of the insurance laws in state X.
[B] Are computed in accordance with accepted actuarial standards and principles.
[C] Make a reasonable provision for all unpaid loss and loss adjustment expense obligations of the Company under the terms of its contracts and agreements.
[D] Make a reasonable provision for the unearned premium reserves for long duration contracts (and possibly Other Loss Reserve items on which the Appointed Actuary is expressing an Opinion) of the Company under the terms of its contracts and agreements.

SAUl Up
S = State X - meets requirements of
A = Actuarial principles and standards - computed with
Ul = Unpaid losses - makes a reasonable provision for the computer under its contracts and agreements
Up = Unearned premium - makes a reasonable provision for long duration contracts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Accepted actuarial standards - illustrative language

A

AA reviewed the assumptions & methods used in setting the recorded reserves, assuming it is factually correct:
* Are computed in accordance with accepted actuarial standards.

AA performs an independent analysis of the reserves:
* Are consistent with reserves computed in accordance with accepted actuarial standards.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Opinion language - different conclusions

A

[C] Make a reasonable provision for all net unpaid loss and loss adjustment expenses obligations of the Company under the terms of its contracts and agreements, but a deficient [or redundant] provision on a gross of reinsurance basis. The provision for all gross unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses is $X less than [or greater than] the minimum [or maximum] amount I consider necessary to be within the range of reasonable estimates.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Opinion language - Inadequate/Excessive

A

[C] Make an inadequate [or excessive] provision for the unpaid loss and loss adjustment expenses obligations of the Company under the terms of its contracts and agreements. The provision for unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses is $X less [greater] than the minimum [maximum] amount I consider necessary to be within the range of reasonable estimates.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Opinion language - Qualified

A

In my opinion, with the qualification that it does not include the [identify the item(s) to which the qualification(s) relate(s)], the amounts carried in Exhibit A on account of the items identified:
[A]
[B]
[C]
The Company’s management has informed me that the reserves listed in Exhibit A include $X (x.x%) on a net of reinsurance basis, and $Y (y.y%) on a direct and assumed basis, for [item(s) to which the qualification(s) relate(s)]. I did not include in my review an evaluation of the reserves related to [item(s) to which the qualification(s) relate(s)] because there was not sufficient information available for me to assess the reasonableness of those reserves. Thus, this is a qualified statement of actuarial opinion.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Opinion language - No Opinion

A

The ABC Insurance Co. commenced operations in 20XX. Therefore, the Company has only been in business for Y years and, as a result, does not, in my opinion, have sufficient historical experience upon which to base a reliable actuarial estimate of the loss and loss adjustment expense reserves as of Dec. 31, 20XX. I am not aware of appropriate external data upon which to base an estimate.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Items to consider when making use of work of another

A

E(NPC)
Effect of variations in other person’s estimates on appointed actuary’s opinion
Nature of coverage
Proportion of reserves covered by other person’s work (relative to total reserves)
Credentials of other person

17
Q

Work of others - disclosures

A

if an actuary: disclose name, credential, affiliation (within OPINION paragraph)
if a non-actuary: disclose name, affiliation, type of analysis performed

18
Q

Work of others - illustrative language

A

Included in OPINION paragraph (after items A-E):
The Company participates in the [name of underwriting pool] (“the Pool”). In forming my opinion, I made use of the analysis and opinion issued by Mr. Joe Actuary, MAAA, FCAS, Chief Actuary for the Pool, regarding reserves held by the Company for the Pool.

19
Q

Company-specific Risk Factors list (Relevant Comments)

A

Company Operations - DONGAS
* Data (thin or unexplained changes)
* Operations (qualitative changes in operations)
* New (new products or new markets)
* Growth (rapid growth in 1 or more business segments)
* Adequacy (changes in adequacy of case reserves)
* Severity (changes in severity or frequency)

General
* A&E losses (Asbestos & Environmental)
* Catastrophic weather events
* Cyber liability
* Mass torts (asbestos)
* Construction defects
* New legislation

Other
* Distributional changes in limits/attachment points/deductibles
* Terms of reinsurance contracts

20
Q

Company-specific Risk Factors - illustrative language

A

Actuarial estimates of property and casualty loss and loss adjustment expense reserves are inherently uncertain because they are dependent on future contingent events. Also, these reserve estimates are generally derived from analyses of historical data, and future events or conditions may differ from the past. The actual amount necessary to settle the unpaid claims may therefore be significantly different from the reserve amounts listed in Exhibit A.

The following provides major factors and/or particular conditions underlying the risks and uncertainties that I consider relevant to the Company’s estimates of unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses at December 31, 2021:

  1. Description of Item 1
  2. Description of Item 2
  3. Description of Item 3
21
Q

COVID-19 Impacts (Relevant Comments)

A

Direct impacts: loss and unearned premium reserves, claims patterns and loss trends, collectability of reinsurance and/or premiums, exposure
Indirect impacts: claims handling delays and procedural changes resulting from public health orders

22
Q

COVID-19 Examples (Relevant Comments)

A
  • Workers’ Compensation: some states have passed regulations whereby an employee working outside of their home who tests positive is presumed to have acquired the diseases related to their employment and is eligible for WC benefits.
  • Actuarial loss data: delays in the court system may have impacted loss payment & reporting
  • Exposure assumptions: the COVID-19 impact on the overall economy could bring about changes in exposure assumptions that were established before COVID-19.
23
Q

Materiality standard - illustrative language

A

My Materiality Standard for purposes of addressing the risk of material adverse deviation of the Company’s reserves for unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses has been established as xx% of the Company’s net loss and LAE reserves, or $X million.

My Materiality Standard for purposes of addressing the risk of material adverse deviation of the Company’s reserves for unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses has been established as $Y million. This represents the reduction in surplus that would result in additional action based on the NAIC RBC formula. A reduction in surplus of $Y million would result in the Company moving into the [state which RBC level, e.g., Company] Action Level.

24
Q

Does RMAD exist?

A

(reserves + materiality standard) < (high end of actuary’s reserve range) = YES

(reserves + materiality standard) >= (high end of actuary’s reserve range) = NO

25
Q

RMAD exists - illustrative language

A

I believe there are significant risks and uncertainties associated with the Company’s net loss and loss adjustment expense reserves that could result in material adverse deviation. I have identified those risk factors as _____, _____, and ____. These risk factors are discussed in more detail in section (5.2) and elsewhere in this opinion. The absense of other risk factors from this commentary is not meant to imply that additional factors cannot be identified in the future as having had a significant influence on the Company’s reserves.

26
Q

RMAD mitigating factor - illustrative language

A

It should be noted, however, that the company has entered into a retroactive reinsurance contract which would serve to mitigate the impact of adverse deviation in loss and LAE reserves on the company’s statutory surplus if recoverables from that contract were considered as a reduction in net loss and LAE reserves.

27
Q

RMAD doesn’t exist - illustrative language

A

In my analysis I considered [the aforementioned risk factors and] the implications of uncertainty in estimates of unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses in determining a range of reasonable unpaid claim estimates. I have also observed that the difference between the high end of my range of reasonable unpaid claim estimate and the Company’s carried reserve for losses and loss adjustment expense is less than my materiality standard. I further considered whether there are significant risks and uncertainties that could result in material adverse deviation. In light of the materiality considerations within this analysis, and after considering the potential risks and uncertainties that could bear on the Company’s reserve development, I concluded that those risks and uncertainties would not reasonably be expected to result in material adverse deviation in the Company’s carried reserves for unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses.