Sampling Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Universe

A

Broad population to which you want to generalize your findings (e.g. everyone with anorexia)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Population

A

The defined group within the universe from which the sample will be selected (e.g. anorexia patients across 10 hospitals)`

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Sample

A

The participants who actually take part in the study (e.g. 50 participants from those hospitals)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Statistic vs. population parameter

A

Statistic: quantitative measurement from a sample (what we actually get in research)

Population parameter: estimate of the value in the population (what we want to know but almost never know with certainty)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Confidence interval

A

A range of values for which are plausible for the population

A generalized value for the population

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Threats to external validity

A

Sample characteristics, ecological validity, reactivity, multiple treatment interference, novelty effect, disruption effect, test sensitization

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Sample characteristics (EV threat)

A

Differences between study sample and other samples you wish to generalize the findings to (age, gender, etc)

solution: get a representative sample

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Ecological validity (EV threat)

A

The methods, materials, and setting of the study must approximate the real-life situation under investigation

solution: try to make research as close to real-life as possible

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Reactivity of experimental arrangements (EV threat)

A

Awareness of being in a study may affect behaviour or elicit certain reaction; participants have theories about research/may act the way they think you want them to act

solution: don’t let participants know hypotheses beforehand

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Multiple-treatment interference (EV threat)

A

If many treatments are applied, it is difficult to determine how well each of the treatments would work individually

solution: treatment 1, treatment 2, control, both

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Novelty effect (EV threat)

A

Treatment is only working because its ‘new’; people are enthusiastic and expect it to work

solution: wait a while after the program has started before starting evaluations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Disruption effect (EV threat)

A

Treatment appears to fail in the short term because it has disrupted daily life/routine

solution:wait a while after the program has started before starting evaluations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Test sensitization

A

Does pre-testing or the test itself alter subject experience/response (ex. what effect does rating your mood prior to a mood induction technique have your mood)

solution: avoid within-subject design, or multiple condition varying the order or stimuli presented

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Sample selection bias

A

Convenience sampling (admitting anyone you can find into the study from a population that’s easy to recruit)

WEIRD research
80% of participants were psych undergrads
96% cone from countries that make up 12% of the population

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Attrition (EV threat)

A

Longitudinal design issue

Number of dropouts across groups could effect results

solution: reminders, backloading

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Statistical power

A

how many participants are needed to have a successful experiement

17
Q

Statistical power relies on…

A
  1. Effect size
  2. Alpha (type I error)
  3. Beta (type II error)
18
Q

Effect size

A

How large is the effect?/What is the magnitude of the effect?

19
Q

Measuring effect size

A

Pearson’s r (.1 = small; .3 = medium; .5 = large)

Cohen’s d (.3 = small; .5 = medium; .8 = large)

20
Q

Alpha

A

Type I error; false positive = 0.05

probability of finding an effect size when none exists

21
Q

Beta

A

Probability of missing an effect that IS present

Type II error

Usually .80 (20% chance of type II error)