Sampling Flashcards
Universe
Broad population to which you want to generalize your findings (e.g. everyone with anorexia)
Population
The defined group within the universe from which the sample will be selected (e.g. anorexia patients across 10 hospitals)`
Sample
The participants who actually take part in the study (e.g. 50 participants from those hospitals)
Statistic vs. population parameter
Statistic: quantitative measurement from a sample (what we actually get in research)
Population parameter: estimate of the value in the population (what we want to know but almost never know with certainty)
Confidence interval
A range of values for which are plausible for the population
A generalized value for the population
Threats to external validity
Sample characteristics, ecological validity, reactivity, multiple treatment interference, novelty effect, disruption effect, test sensitization
Sample characteristics (EV threat)
Differences between study sample and other samples you wish to generalize the findings to (age, gender, etc)
solution: get a representative sample
Ecological validity (EV threat)
The methods, materials, and setting of the study must approximate the real-life situation under investigation
solution: try to make research as close to real-life as possible
Reactivity of experimental arrangements (EV threat)
Awareness of being in a study may affect behaviour or elicit certain reaction; participants have theories about research/may act the way they think you want them to act
solution: don’t let participants know hypotheses beforehand
Multiple-treatment interference (EV threat)
If many treatments are applied, it is difficult to determine how well each of the treatments would work individually
solution: treatment 1, treatment 2, control, both
Novelty effect (EV threat)
Treatment is only working because its ‘new’; people are enthusiastic and expect it to work
solution: wait a while after the program has started before starting evaluations
Disruption effect (EV threat)
Treatment appears to fail in the short term because it has disrupted daily life/routine
solution:wait a while after the program has started before starting evaluations
Test sensitization
Does pre-testing or the test itself alter subject experience/response (ex. what effect does rating your mood prior to a mood induction technique have your mood)
solution: avoid within-subject design, or multiple condition varying the order or stimuli presented
Sample selection bias
Convenience sampling (admitting anyone you can find into the study from a population that’s easy to recruit)
WEIRD research
80% of participants were psych undergrads
96% cone from countries that make up 12% of the population
Attrition (EV threat)
Longitudinal design issue
Number of dropouts across groups could effect results
solution: reminders, backloading