s20 Grievous bodily harm Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What act is GBH layed out in?

A

s20 Offences Against the Person Act 1861

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What type of offence is GBH?

A

Triable either way

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the punishment for GBH?

A

5 years max

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Why has this punishment recieved criticism?

A

Because it is the same sentence as ABH

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What case defined “Greivous”? What was this definition?

A

DPP v Smith - “Really serious harm”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What case gave examples of GBH injuries? Give two of these injuries?

A
  • Missing teeth R v Brown and Stratton
  • Concussion
  • Bruising
  • Broken nose
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are the two ways GBH can be proved?

A

Infliction of GBH - Wounding of the victim

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What case involved to reckless transmission of HIV to a unaware victim?

A

R v Dica

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What was established in R v Bollom

A

The age and charasteristics of the victim are relevent to the extent of the injuries sustained

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is the legal definition of a wound?

A

A breaking in the continuity of the skin. Usually resulting in bleeding

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What case held that both the dermis and epedermis must be broken for it to be considered wounding?

A

Moriatry v Brooks

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What word is the mens rea for GBH defined by?

A

“Maliciously”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What was decided in R v Mowatt

A

It does not need to be established if the defendant intented or was reckless in their infliciton of GBh as long as it can be proved the defendant intended or was reckless to cause some type of physical harm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What case clarified this and how?

A

DPP v A - It was held to be sufficient to prove the defendant intended or foresaw that some harm might occur and not to prove they foresaw that serious harm would occur

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly