Rylands v Fletcher Flashcards
Rylands v Fletcher
Damage to land arising from non-natural use of adjacent land.
Rylands v Fletcher test
The claimant must have a legal interest in the land
A bringing onto the land of a non-natural substance
Substance is likely to do mischief if it escapes
Substance escapes and causes reasonably foreseeable damage
Legal interest in the land - case
Rylands v Fletcher test
Hunter v Canary Wharf (proprietary interests)
Non natural substance- case
Rylands v Fletcher test
TransCo v Stockport MBC (must be “extraordinary” use of land)
Alternatively, Giles v Walker
Likely to do mischief on escape - case
Rylands v Fletcher test
Hale v Jennings Bros
Escapes and causes reasonably foreseeable damage - case
Rylands v Fletcher test
Read v Lyons
Hunter v Canary Wharf (proprietary interests)
Legal interest in the land - case
Rylands v Fletcher test
TransCo v Stockport MBC
Non natural substance- case
Rylands v Fletcher test
Hale v Jennings Bros
Likely to do mischief on escape - case
Rylands v Fletcher test
Read v Lyons
Escapes and causes reasonably foreseeable damage - case
Rylands v Fletcher test
Specific Defences
Act of a stranger (Perry v Kendricks Transport)
Consent
Contributory Negligence
Statutory Authority
Act of God (Nicols v Marsland)